Voyager 2 pipes up again

Voyager 2 pipes up again

Author
Discussion

Pupp

Original Poster:

12,357 posts

279 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all

PeterGadsby

1,323 posts

170 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
How does it still have power after all this time?

P

Gameface

16,565 posts

84 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Incredible.

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
PeterGadsby said:
How does it still have power after all this time?

P
Plutonium.

Mr MXT

7,711 posts

290 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
PeterGadsby said:
How does it still have power after all this time?

P
Borrowed a charger from reception at the Holiday Inn, Neptune smile

It’s so impressive, 40 year old tech. I can’t quite get my head round it!

pincher

9,034 posts

224 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
That boggles my mind. Just how?!?

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Voyager (as well as a number of spacecraft) uses the decay of Plutonium as a heat source to generate electricity. It has on board a Radioactive Thermal Generator (RTG) which is, in effect, a nuclear battery.

RTGs are used on spacecraft in situations when other, more common power sources such as chemical batteries, fuel cells or solar cells are not sufficient for the job.

When Voyager was being designed in the late 1960s, its original mission was a fly by of Jupiter. Jupiter is 500 million miles from the sun and power of sunlight at that distance is only 1/25 what it is at earth (93 million miles from the sun). Because of the low light levels, it was decided early on in the mission planning that solar cells would not be able to provide sufficient power so the decision was made to go for the RTG option. This decision also opened up the possibility of follow on flybys of further planets - which were eventually incorporated into the mission.

Other space missions have used RTGs too, notably the Viking Mars landers, the experiment packages left on the moon by later Apollo missions, the Galileo probe to Jupiter, the Cassini probe to Saturn, and the New Horizons probe to Pluto.

At the moment, orbiting Jupiter is the Juno probe. Juno DOES use solar panels to provide power even though it is 500 million miles from the sun. This is because, in the half century since Voyager was designed, solar panels have become much more efficient so it was deemed a practical proposal for Juno. The Juno solar panels are very large, being 30 feet long (there are three of them).





RTG is only ever installed on a spacecraft if there is no other option because there is a small but definite risk attached to their use, particularly during launch. If a launch vehicle is lost (it does happen every now and then) with an RTG powered spacecraft on board, the RTG cannister will end up back on earth, possibly damaged and possibly leaking. As most RTG launches have been from Cape Canaveral, the RTG cannister would end up in the Atlantic.

nealeh1875

1,149 posts

99 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
It's unbelievable especially considering this..

Article said:
they have 200,000 times less memory than a smartphone

Gameface

16,565 posts

84 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
It's the TWELVE BILLION miles that gets me.

I get the hump when I have to drive from London to Cambridge!

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
nealeh1875 said:
It's unbelievable especially considering this..

Article said:
they have 200,000 times less memory than a smartphone
Of no real relevance. They were programmed to carry out certain tasks, which they did wonderfully well. Indeed, they exceeded expectations. And they were updated and improved whilst in space from time to time by uplinking new code.

At the moment they aren't doing much at all apart from basically sending out a signal to tell us that they are still powered up. Nearly all the experiments (cameras, ultra violet sensors, electric motors etc) were turned off many years ago. The only experiment package still functioning is the magnetometer which measures fluctuations in the sun's magnetic field. This was left operating as they can use the data from this to help determine the boundaries of the solar system through measuring the sun's interaction with intergalactic space.

Blackpuddin

17,393 posts

212 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Noting that the radio signal's round trip to Voyager and back took three and a half days, I'm wondering if Eric knows whether radio signals degrade over distance? Is there a distance or time limit to radio transmissions?

Taita

7,724 posts

210 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
nealeh1875 said:
It's unbelievable especially considering this..

Article said:
they have 200,000 times less memory than a smartphone
Of no real relevance. They were programmed to carry out certain tasks, which they did wonderfully well. Indeed, they exceeded expectations. And they were updated and improved whilst in space from time to time by uplinking new code.

At the moment they aren't doing much at all apart from basically sending out a signal to tell us that they are still powered up. Nearly all the experiments (cameras, ultra violet sensors, electric motors etc) were turned off many years ago. The only experiment package still functioning is the magnetometer which measures fluctuations in the sun's magnetic field. This was left operating as they can use the data from this to help determine the boundaries of the solar system through measuring the sun's interaction with intergalactic space.
Are those other sensors turned off to save power or similar? eg the plutonium slowly drops its output over the years?

tight fart

3,078 posts

280 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Gameface said:
It's the TWELVE BILLION miles that gets me.

I get the hump when I have to drive from London to Cambridge!
How long would it take for light to travel 12 billion miles?
(My guess around a day?)

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Depends on how powerful the radio signal is and the sensitivity of the receiving equipment. Some of the furthest objects in the universe (13 BILLION light years away) can ONLY be detected by their radio signals.

Obviously, a spacecraft the size of a Transit Van is not going to have the radio power of a galaxy so the signal from something like Voyager is exceedingly weak. However, the ground equipment on earth is very sensitive and it can still pick up these very weak signals. In fact, Voyage will most likely run out of power generating juice before its signal becomes too weak to be picked up on earth (don't forget that there are two of these Voyagers and both are still in contact with earth).

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Taita said:
Are those other sensors turned off to save power or similar? eg the plutonium slowly drops its output over the years?
They were. Once Voyager 2 had passed by Neptune (in 1989) there was nothing for its camera to look at so the camera was turned off to save power. Famously, before it did this, Carl Sagan requested that it take one last shot as it faced back along its trajectory from the inner Solar System - the famous Blue Dot picture.



Other sensors were turned off too for the same reason.

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
tight fart said:
Gameface said:
It's the TWELVE BILLION miles that gets me.

I get the hump when I have to drive from London to Cambridge!
How long would it take for light to travel 12 billion miles?
(My guess around a day?)
Slightly faster than that. Jupiter is half a billion miles from the sun. Light takes about 50 minutes to travel from the sun to Jupiter. That means it would take 100 minutes to travel 1 billion miles and 1,200 minutes to travel 12 billion miles i.e 20 hours.

tog

4,631 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
However, the ground equipment on earth is very sensitive and it can still pick up these very weak signals.
Don't they use those weak but known signals as a way of calibrating or testing some sensors here on Earth? Sure I read that somewhere once.

Eric Mc

122,855 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Didn't know that but it would be a good test of your equipment.

There are other probes that could be used that are still functioning.

anonymous-user

61 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Awesome. I highly recommend “The Farthest” documentary on amazon prime about voyager 1 and 2.

NordicCrankShaft

1,777 posts

122 months

Tuesday 17th November 2020
quotequote all
Every time this pops up regardless of the context or how much its been toned down in terms of use over the years it blows my mind, that and watching the recent run of space launches where the stage one boosters return to earth and land themselves, absolutely incredible stuff.