Parker Solar Probe

Author
Discussion

Beati Dogu

Original Poster:

9,193 posts

146 months

Sunday 5th August 2018
quotequote all
NASA's Parker Solar Probe is due to be launched atop a Delta 4 Heavy rocket on Saturday 11th August - from Cape Canaveral (08.48-09.33 UK time) and they're always impressive to see. First one for 2 years too.

The specially shielded probe will fly to 3.8 million miles from the Sun's surface, which is 7 times closer than any other spacecraft ever has. It'll study the solar winds and the surface of the Sun itself while braving intense solar radiation & heat of around 1,300 degrees Celsius.



It's not the largest thing we've ever put into space, but it'll eventually be the fastest man made object, getting up to around 430,000 mph (700,000 kph).

They're going to put it in an orbit between the Sun and Venus, using Venus's gravity to gradually lower the orbit for closer & closer passes of the Sun. This will require 7 passes of Venus over 6 years to bring it down to closest approach through the Sun's corona. This will start in late 2024, but they'll be able to gather data along the way.


https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/parker-solar-...

Edited by Beati Dogu on Sunday 5th August 19:04

Beati Dogu

Original Poster:

9,193 posts

146 months

Wednesday 8th August 2018
quotequote all
More whales & rockets:



With a human and the Parker Solar Probe to scale.


Seems like overkill to launch a diminutive spacecraft on a large $400 million rocket, but the energy requirements of this mission demand it. This particular Delta IV Heavy rocket has a third "kick stage" as well, which will help fire the probe towards Venus.

This will be the fastest object ever to leave the Earth's atmosphere. Beating a record of 36,400 mph set by the New Horizons mission during launch on an Atlas V in 2006.

Somewhat perversely, the high velocity is actually to slow down the spacecraft. The Earth orbits the sun at about 70,000 mph and so effectively does anything we launch. A trip to the Sun and inner planets means reducing that speed somewhat.


Eric Mc

122,856 posts

272 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Launch this morning - in just over an hour. Being a Delta IV Heavy, the launch should be spectacular.

PRTVR

7,441 posts

228 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Link to the webcast
https://www.space.com/17933-nasa-television-webcas...
Good to see they are going at night so it won't be hot..... getmecoat

ZOLLAR

19,914 posts

180 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Launch this morning - in just over an hour. Being a Delta IV Heavy, the launch should be spectacular.
Anyone else get their name onto the memory card they're sending with it, managed to put a few on biggrin

Eric Mc

122,856 posts

272 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Back in "Hold" again. My hunch is it won't be going today.

MTech535

613 posts

118 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Thought I had missed it, but they seen to have held the launch.9 minutes left of launch window!t minus 4.00

Eric Mc

122,856 posts

272 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Scrub confirmed.

MTech535

613 posts

118 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Balls!

Eric Mc

122,856 posts

272 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Trying again for tomorrow.

The Falcon 9 Heavy does not like holds. Due to the very cold nature of the propellants, the whole stack cold-soaks and the temperatures of various critical components such as valves, pumps and fuel lines can go below safe operating limits.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

82 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
You are indeed a mine of information Eric hehe

Eric Mc

122,856 posts

272 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Kccv23highliftcam said:
You are indeed a mine of information Eric hehe
I only know that because, in December 2014, when they were launching the Orion spacecraft on its first test flight atop a Delta IV heavy, a small boat wandered into the "no go" zone off the coast and the launch was put on hold while they cleared the area.

By the time that was done, they had to scrub the launch because some of the components were showing lower than allowed temperatures.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

82 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Kccv23highliftcam said:
You are indeed a mine of information Eric hehe
I only know that because, in December 2014, when they were launching the Orion spacecraft on its first test flight atop a Delta IV heavy, a small boat wandered into the "no go" zone off the coast and the launch was put on hold while they cleared the area.

By the time that was done, they had to scrub the launch because some of the components were showing lower than allowed temperatures.
Uhuh...........................

996Keef

435 posts

98 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
https://youtu.be/wwMDvPCGeE0

Coverage starts in 5 mins

andy_s

19,607 posts

266 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
'Tea Lady?'
'GO!'

All smooth, interesting mission. Liked that hydrogen plume at the start-up.

anonymous-user

61 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
Watched it with my kids. Inspirational stuff for future generations. Nice to see Parker himself being interviewed at the end.

Beati Dogu

Original Poster:

9,193 posts

146 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
This thing is really motoring; It's already well beyond the Moon's orbit.

Just for comparison, it took Apollo just over 2 days to get into Lunar orbit.

996Keef

435 posts

98 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
Watching the telemetry really opened my eyes, after 4 mins or so it was doing 4 miles per second! Madness.

Great coverage this morning as well


Simpo Two

87,083 posts

272 months

Sunday 12th August 2018
quotequote all
Was this on the BBC news or did we just get another daily dose of anti-Brexit, anti-Trump and Syria?

Beati Dogu

Original Poster:

9,193 posts

146 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Surprisingly they did cover it, but like the rest of the TV media, they soon lost interest when it didn't blow up on the pad.

Then they went back to reporting on the "stolen jet" that clearly had propellers on it. They probably thought it was wind powered though to be fair.