Interesting - new advanced drone?
Discussion
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000005607812/l...
This would be fine on April 1st, but strange its been released. Shame video isn't longer
This would be fine on April 1st, but strange its been released. Shame video isn't longer
Brother D said:
Erm you appreciated this footage was only released in the past day or so right?
yes but you put 'new advanced drone'. It was made, 13 years ago, so isn't new and wouldn't be advanced nowadays.It is interesting but could be anything considering it is a UFO, and things like this have been sighted before.
The Spruce goose said:
Brother D said:
Erm you appreciated this footage was only released in the past day or so right?
yes but you put 'new advanced drone'. It was made, 13 years ago, so isn't new and wouldn't be advanced nowadays.It is interesting but could be anything considering it is a UFO, and things like this have been sighted before.
Please, send me all the links to all the drones that you say can do all of this.
Brother D said:
So you think an un-identified aircraft that can outpace F18s, make seemingly 'impossible turns', 'Accelerated faster than anything' an F18 pilot has ever seen, can go from 80,000ft to hover over the Sea in a matter of seconds, is now the norm? and in no way could be considered 'advanced'?
Please, send me all the links to all the drones that you say can do all of this.
Why is it a drone, this type of object has been seen countless times before reported, i used to read about it 20 years ago on UFO forums, its been going on for over 50 years, you seem to label it a drone? I guess based on that being modern nowadays, saying it would an advanced drone wouldn't make sense as i sad this is 14 years ago so the tech would be more mainstream. Please, send me all the links to all the drones that you say can do all of this.
Interestingly about the same time as this video, i worked for a company who supplied drone engines.
Edit where you get 80k height from, there weren't flying a blackbird. I think it is fake, the US has a habit of releasing fake stuff up to stir the UFO bods up, it is like a smoke screen to the real tech.
Edited by The Spruce goose on Monday 18th December 23:45
Those Hornets from the USS Nimitz off San Diego.
I recon the ship went through a wormhole to December 7th 1941 and the drone / UFO was actually a Japanese Zero fighter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Final_Countdown_...
I recon the ship went through a wormhole to December 7th 1941 and the drone / UFO was actually a Japanese Zero fighter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Final_Countdown_...
The Spruce goose said:
Why is it a drone, this type of object has been seen countless times before reported, i used to read about it 20 years ago on UFO forums, its been going on for over 50 years, you seem to label it a drone? I guess based on that being modern nowadays, saying it would an advanced drone wouldn't make sense as i sad this is 14 years ago so the tech would be more mainstream.
Interestingly about the same time as this video, i worked for a company who supplied drone engines.
Edit where you get 80k height from, there weren't flying a blackbird. I think it is fake, the US has a habit of releasing fake stuff up to stir the UFO bods up, it is like a smoke screen to the real tech.
He's calling it a drone maybe because that's what the pilots in the video called it? Interestingly about the same time as this video, i worked for a company who supplied drone engines.
Edit where you get 80k height from, there weren't flying a blackbird. I think it is fake, the US has a habit of releasing fake stuff up to stir the UFO bods up, it is like a smoke screen to the real tech.
Edited by The Spruce goose on Monday 18th December 23:45
Also;
The object had been detected appearing suddenly at 80,000ft by the USS Princeton, a Naval cruiser, which had been tracking mysterious aircraft for two weeks.
"Look at that thing, dude," one of the pilots is heard exclaiming in the clip. "It's rotating."
Cmdr Fravor told the New York Times the object was about 40ft long, had no plumes, wings or rotors, and outpaced their F-18s. It was big enough to churn the sea 50ft below it, he said.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/us-military-r...
Oakey said:
He's calling it a drone maybe because that's what the pilots in the video called it?
Also;
The object had been detected appearing suddenly at 80,000ft by the USS Princeton, a Naval cruiser, which had been tracking mysterious aircraft for two weeks.
"Look at that thing, dude," one of the pilots is heard exclaiming in the clip. "It's rotating."
Cmdr Fravor told the New York Times the object was about 40ft long, had no plumes, wings or rotors, and outpaced their F-18s. It was big enough to churn the sea 50ft below it, he said.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/us-military-r...
yes I noticed that about the drone, but the height bit is conjecture there is no measurements to back this up, it is the eye witness reports. o.k it is recorded on some sort of IR sensor, and they talk about a fleet of them yet no more are shown. Also there are 2 videos you seemed to have mixed them up.Also;
The object had been detected appearing suddenly at 80,000ft by the USS Princeton, a Naval cruiser, which had been tracking mysterious aircraft for two weeks.
"Look at that thing, dude," one of the pilots is heard exclaiming in the clip. "It's rotating."
Cmdr Fravor told the New York Times the object was about 40ft long, had no plumes, wings or rotors, and outpaced their F-18s. It was big enough to churn the sea 50ft below it, he said.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/us-military-r...
Interesting piece here about the team in the DoD that studies such things and the video.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pen...
A similar piece but with the added interest of why the head of the department resigned, of course he could just be moaning about under funding and trying to get more money for his ex-colleagues.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/16...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pen...
A similar piece but with the added interest of why the head of the department resigned, of course he could just be moaning about under funding and trying to get more money for his ex-colleagues.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/16...
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff