Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2017
Discussion
These are beautiful. I especially like the first one and the one of the Aurora over the beach in Norway.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-40789348
The exhibition starts at Greenwich in September (http://www.rmg.co.uk/royal-observatory/insight-astronomy-photographer-year)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-40789348
The exhibition starts at Greenwich in September (http://www.rmg.co.uk/royal-observatory/insight-astronomy-photographer-year)
I used to have a Canon 350 and focus ring infinity was not strictly infinity, I think, and with no back screen to check it could be just a tad out. That is I had to take the shot, get that card to the computer to check then crack on (light pollution being what it is). I now have have a 7D and recent attempts on the Moon using the rear screen is a lot better to judge. So this winter I hope to get some better time at the scope and tripod work/time/weather allowing. Bumping the ISO also led to really bad quality on the 350D, the 7D stunned me in this aspect when I first tried it, superb.
The good ISS passes taken on the 350 I have kept, however I have also deleted many bad ones where I have just got the focusing the wrong side. Not had the opportunity with the 7D yet (work and weather and all that).
For the scope should really get that better engineered Cayford focuser. The machined gearing on the standard Skywatcher is industrial at best for a camera (no lens attached). This has been on my todo list for many years.
The good ISS passes taken on the 350 I have kept, however I have also deleted many bad ones where I have just got the focusing the wrong side. Not had the opportunity with the 7D yet (work and weather and all that).
For the scope should really get that better engineered Cayford focuser. The machined gearing on the standard Skywatcher is industrial at best for a camera (no lens attached). This has been on my todo list for many years.
I've not yet attempted astrophotography, despite being interested in astronomy in a practical way since childhood, and having a degree in it. A friend of mine is very good at astrophotography and the lengths he goes to are extraordinary! I've got it earmarked for my retirement, providing the dark sky site we chose for our 'forever' house three years ago isn't ruined by streetlights by then....
I like to dabble in to in the back garden however going to a dark site with no way to check my results put me off (no lap top)..... That is with the 350, if I can start to get better results comfortably with the 7D then might start hunting the dark sites.
I did try in Yellowstone a few years ago. That place was so dark the sky was amazing, absolutely stunning. No horizon city light pollution. A local yellow street light at the cabin, keeping bear spray handy, a short walk and it was pitch black. I swore I was surrounded by bears licking their lips.
Results were out of focus
I did try in Yellowstone a few years ago. That place was so dark the sky was amazing, absolutely stunning. No horizon city light pollution. A local yellow street light at the cabin, keeping bear spray handy, a short walk and it was pitch black. I swore I was surrounded by bears licking their lips.
Results were out of focus
RobM77 said:
jmorgan said:
IResults were out of focus
Sorry for the quip then, I'll add focusing to my long list of 'things that are hard about astrophotography'!I bet you make a better job at it.
It keeps me occupied.
https://www.lonelyspeck.com/focusing-at-night/
Now that filter looks handy, and I have a filter holder that should take that.....
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff