How much weight to sink a block of ice ?

How much weight to sink a block of ice ?

Author
Discussion

sparkythecat

Original Poster:

7,961 posts

262 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
If I have a cylindrical block of ice weighing 3kg, what's the minimum weight of lead thatI would need to add to it, to make it sink to the bottom of a pond 10m deep?

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

205 months

V8LM

5,269 posts

216 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Not quite. The calculation needs to account for the buoyancy of the lead, but close enough. Also depends on the temperature of the water in the pond.

Density of ice at 0 degrees is 916.2 kg/m^3
Density of water at 4 degrees is 1000 kg/m^3
Density of lead (varies with T) is 11 340 kg/m^3

To sink the "density" of the ice and lead has to exceed that of the water.

Mass of ice = Mi
Mass of lead = Ml
Volume of ice = Vi = Mi / 916.2
Volume of lead = Vl = Ml / 11 340

Density of ice and lead = (Mi + Ml) / (Mi / 916.2 + Ml / 11 340) > 1000

3 + Ml > 3000 / 916.2 + 1000 Ml / 11 340

Ml (1 - 1000 / 11 340) > 3000 / 916.2 - 3

Ml > 0.274 / 0.9118

Ml > 0.300 kg


(Quick check: density of ice is 90% that of water, so extra 10% mass needed = 0.3 kg)


Zad

12,762 posts

243 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Depends on the temperature of the ice and how much air is in it. Assuming it to be solid, once it has passed the threshold for buoyancy, it should sink all the way down. The density of ice is approximately 90% that of water, so a ballpark figure would be 10% of the weight would need to be added as ballast. Neglecting the volume of the lead, water purity etc. Shape of the ice and depth of the pond is irrelevant.

TL:DR; Approximately 300g of ballast.

sunbeam alpine

7,081 posts

195 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
One small polar bear should do it. smile

spyder dryver

1,330 posts

223 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Is this trickier than it seems or am I over thinking it?
21.16 cc of lead weighing 240g will push the ice under but the lead will then lose 21.16g as it goes into the water. I think. So add that.But thats just under 2 more ccs of lead, displacing 1.86 more ccs of water resulting in 1.86g more lost weight.
So I'll guess 240+21.16+1.86 = 263.2g ish

anonymous-user

61 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Er, won't it melt in the warmer water? or is the pond at the triple point?

sparkythecat

Original Poster:

7,961 posts

262 months

Tuesday 7th March 2017
quotequote all
Excellent ! Thanks for your help chaps.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

135 months

Tuesday 7th March 2017
quotequote all
sparkythecat said:
Excellent ! Thanks for your help chaps.
The main question is why did you ask this? It's quite an unusual question.





CoolHands

19,462 posts

202 months

Tuesday 7th March 2017
quotequote all
What does being cylindrical have to do with it?

V8LM

5,269 posts

216 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Makes it easier to get CoolHands.

sparkythecat

Original Poster:

7,961 posts

262 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
What does being cylindrical have to do with it?
Excellent username, given the topic in question smile

For those that are wondering what it's all about.
I intend to freeze some blocks of 'rubby-dubby' or chum (fish guts trimmings and slops)
They'll be moulded in small buckets, with a volume of around 3 litres. I wanted to know what size of lead weight to throw into the mix when I'm freezing them to be guaranteed that the blocks will sink. The lead weight , frozen in the mix will have a loop of line on that I will clip through a carabiner and slide down the anchor rope when I'm fishing off my boat. As the ice melts, the rubby-dubby trail will drift down the tide and attract fish under the boat.
The lead weight will be retrieved when the anchor is eventually hauled.
Yes I realise that frozen fish entrails are not the same density as ice and that seawater is slightly more dense than freshwater, but from the calculations you've done for me I recon that a pound of lead (454g)in each block should do.
Which is good, because I already have a good number of 1lb weights to hand


Ilovejapcrap

3,297 posts

119 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
I need to know

Why are you doing this ?

Sir Lord Poopie

212 posts

97 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
i would load the block until it sunk, that's the weight required.

Ilovejapcrap

3,297 posts

119 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Sir Lord Poopie said:
i would load the block until it sunk, that's the weight required.
But why for the love of god why

sparkythecat

Original Poster:

7,961 posts

262 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
Ilovejapcrap said:
I need to know

Why are you doing this ?
Anglers love to experiment.
http://www.worldseafishing.com/forums/threads/rubb...

Gandahar

9,600 posts

135 months

Thursday 9th March 2017
quotequote all
You originally said

"make it sink to the bottom of a pond 10m deep?"

But it sounds like you will not be doing this fishing in a pond. Have I got that right?

If you have a pond then I doubt you will have need for a chum bucket for snagging goldfish or koi carp.

Just use one of these

Halmyre

11,566 posts

146 months

Wednesday 15th March 2017
quotequote all
I think he's chopped his wife up into chunks and kept her in the freezer and now wants to dispose of the body parts in his (extra deep) fish pond. And all you 'helpful' suckerspeople are now accessories.

sunbeam alpine

7,081 posts

195 months

Wednesday 15th March 2017
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
I think he's chopped his wife up into chunks and kept her in the freezer and now wants to dispose of the body parts in his (extra deep) fish pond. And all you 'helpful' suckerspeople are now accessories.
If he followed my advice the polar bear will have disposed of the evidence by now. smile

maffski

1,886 posts

166 months

Thursday 16th March 2017
quotequote all
sunbeam alpine said:
If he followed my advice the polar bear will have disposed of the evidence by now. smile
But only for a day or so