The 'Turing Test' passed
Discussion
Simpo Two said:
Did Turing ever consider how 13 year-old boys might speak, sorry type, in 2014? I'm sure the requirements to pass the 'intelligence' test should be more than just language and typing, lol.
If the average 13 year old is like this...Then I could have been quite easy - "grunt, groan, You don't understand..!"
cold thursday said:
simoid said:
On the face of it, the test looks quite simple - two thirds of the experts thought it was a computer
Actually two thirds thought it wasn't. Only 33% thought it was and this was enough to pass the test. probably
Transcript of a "conversation" with the bot. Utter drivel. Also Kevin Warwick is a feckwit.
Listening to John Humphries talking to it, it comes across as actually pretty crap. Rather than AI having improved I would be more inclined to ask whether human intelligence has gone through the floor. Especially those who were convinced.
Edited by Strangely Brown on Sunday 22 June 09:44
Strangely Brown said:
Listening to John Humphries talking to it, it comes across as actually pretty crap. Rather than AI having improved I would be more inclined to ask whether human intelligence has gone through the floor. Especially those that were convinced.
i heard that this morning, the program types text like a nigerian e-mail scammer- utter st.Simpo Two said:
Engineer1 said:
The computer still fooled some people, and to be fair claiming to be a foreign teenager was a good first step.
That makes the test even more pointless.The test is fine, this just abuses it. It only works if it's treated fairly. Which is sort of the point of it!
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff