Discussion
Found this rather interesting: http://images.4chan.org/sci/src/1354361669754.png
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/23/...
Seems to sum up why they are not being developed.
Seems to sum up why they are not being developed.
Galileo said:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/23/...
Seems to sum up why they are not being developed.
You'll forgive me for giving little credence to an article written by a tub-thumping eco-warrior that is formed largely of quotes from Greenpeace, the "International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons", "No Money for Nuclear", and "Communities Against Nuclear Expansion".Seems to sum up why they are not being developed.
Instead I would look to the fact that all the major nuclear powers in the world are actively developing the technology and that benefits are both profound and intensely important. Effectively, the challenges that remain are engineering and economic, and I have almost unbounded confidence in our ability as a race to overcome both of these.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff