Climate Change - The Scientific Debate (Vol. II)

Climate Change - The Scientific Debate (Vol. II)

Author
Discussion

juliussneezer

130 posts

5 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
I hope you're not discounting the advancement in woolen fibres?

remedy

1,680 posts

194 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
I appreciate the responses, thanks.

I'm very familiar with metrology, having been in the precision engineering side of the manufacturing industry for 23 years.
That's also why I'm confused by how a measurement device from >100 years ago would be directly comparable with the equipment we have today.
I struggle to see how a gauge R&R study would be returning <10% for a glass thermometer in 1880. Even assuming it was the best quality one. As GRR shows, the device is one thing, the person(s) reading it is another.

mike9009

7,161 posts

246 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
remedy said:
I appreciate the responses, thanks.

I'm very familiar with metrology, having been in the precision engineering side of the manufacturing industry for 23 years.
That's also why I'm confused by how a measurement device from >100 years ago would be directly comparable with the equipment we have today.
I struggle to see how a gauge R&R study would be returning <10% for a glass thermometer in 1880. Even assuming it was the best quality one. As GRR shows, the device is one thing, the person(s) reading it is another.
If the max temp in a year was 25C and the lowest was say - 5C, the total study variation would be 30C. So a 10% GRR would give an error of 3 degrees in each reading. With a thermometer with 0.1C resolution, I don't think the reproducibility (Have I got that the right way round??) of using a human to read and record would be greater than 10%? Maybe 2%? 0.6C max?

Therefore I would accept the measurement system, unless you were not considering the total variation? I think you need to look at the total variation that the instrument is recording.

Unless I have misunderstood your point?

The bigger issue would perhaps be a systemic bias in the measurement system rather than variability. So, for example, the operator consistently looks at the wrong end of the meniscus. So perhaps a 0.1C difference (I am not familiar with these measurements devices though).

Averaged over a month or year the operator variation would not be a concern or impact the GRR.

Edited by mike9009 on Friday 7th June 09:51

donkmeister

8,494 posts

103 months

Tuesday 11th June
quotequote all
Oh look, the BBC has an article about how June is colder than normal.

So what do we think? Is this because meteorologists can only report statistics on weather that has actually been happening? Or is this just a bluff so they can wait until the climate change deniers are looking the other way before shouting "lol actually it's a record breaking hot one. PSYCH!!!"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c044x1xz42g...

Lawro

88 posts

176 months

Tuesday 11th June
quotequote all
I'm seeing a lot of guff about how May can't possibly be the warmest ever because "I had to wear a woolly hat".

Even if the met office were deliberately deceiving the public I think globally India, at 13 times the size of the UK, more than nullifies any numerical shenanigans.

Hottest summer for 120 years.


donkmeister

8,494 posts

103 months

Tuesday 11th June
quotequote all
Lawro said:
I'm seeing a lot of guff about how May can't possibly be the warmest ever because "I had to wear a woolly hat".

Even if the met office were deliberately deceiving the public I think globally India, at 13 times the size of the UK, more than nullifies any numerical shenanigans.

Hottest summer for 120 years.

Ah, but India having a hot summer is obviously irrelevant to climate change because you expect India to be hot...

My thermometers are clearly the only metric that matters in this debate. I've got one in the fridge and the other in the airing cupboard and they're showing different temperatures. Therefore climate change is a myth.

mike9009

7,161 posts

246 months

Tuesday 11th June
quotequote all
donkmeister said:
Lawro said:
I'm seeing a lot of guff about how May can't possibly be the warmest ever because "I had to wear a woolly hat".

Even if the met office were deliberately deceiving the public I think globally India, at 13 times the size of the UK, more than nullifies any numerical shenanigans.

Hottest summer for 120 years.

Ah, but India having a hot summer is obviously irrelevant to climate change because you expect India to be hot...

My thermometers are clearly the only metric that matters in this debate. I've got one in the fridge and the other in the airing cupboard and they're showing different temperatures. Therefore climate change is a myth.
The problem in India is that the hottest temp recorded is an average and you cannot reliably trust averages.

Averages are hopeless.

So, it is probably not the hottest but just how the data is portrayed.

Am I doing this right?? laugh

Kawasicki

13,162 posts

238 months

Wednesday 12th June
quotequote all
donkmeister said:
Oh look, the BBC has an article about how June is colder than normal.

So what do we think? Is this because meteorologists can only report statistics on weather that has actually been happening? Or is this just a bluff so they can wait until the climate change deniers are looking the other way before shouting "lol actually it's a record breaking hot one. PSYCH!!!"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c044x1xz42g...
Colder than normal is also an expected outcome of climate change, so it’s further supporting evidence.

PRTVR

7,191 posts

224 months

Wednesday 12th June
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
donkmeister said:
Oh look, the BBC has an article about how June is colder than normal.

So what do we think? Is this because meteorologists can only report statistics on weather that has actually been happening? Or is this just a bluff so they can wait until the climate change deniers are looking the other way before shouting "lol actually it's a record breaking hot one. PSYCH!!!"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c044x1xz42g...
Colder than normal is also an expected outcome of climate change, so it’s further supporting evidence.
Warmer,colder, wetter, drier
Repent you sinners, it's all your fault. hehe

juliussneezer

130 posts

5 months

Wednesday 12th June
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
donkmeister said:
Oh look, the BBC has an article about how June is colder than normal.

So what do we think? Is this because meteorologists can only report statistics on weather that has actually been happening? Or is this just a bluff so they can wait until the climate change deniers are looking the other way before shouting "lol actually it's a record breaking hot one. PSYCH!!!"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c044x1xz42g...
Colder than normal is also an expected outcome of climate change, so it’s further supporting evidence.
Possibly but June hasn't finished yet so it's jumping the gun a bit.

Brother D

3,795 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th June
quotequote all


I think Scott Adams has been cancelled - but still amusing : )

Lawro

88 posts

176 months

Tuesday 25th June
quotequote all
I'll see your climate conspiracy agenda meme and raise you a climate denier thicko one.


donkmeister

8,494 posts

103 months

Wednesday 26th June
quotequote all
Lawro said:
I'll see your climate conspiracy agenda meme and raise you a climate denier thicko one.

I bet he would also be complaining about the lack of 24/7 news coverage when a plane that doesn't actually belong to a singer he's never heard of until now, got some orange paint on it...

mike9009

7,161 posts

246 months

Wednesday 26th June
quotequote all
Does the woolen jumper scale have a negative for when someone needs to remove a shirt and wear shorts?

It might make it more accurate for climate measurement.....

Acorn1

726 posts

23 months

Wednesday 26th June
quotequote all
It is quite warm tonight