Boeing Starliner

Author
Discussion

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Wednesday 25th May 2022
quotequote all

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Friday 24th March 2023
quotequote all
The rate they're going it still won't be ready by the time the ISS is decommissioned frown

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Friday 2nd June 2023
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Am I correct in thinking that the original contract for six flights has now been completed by SpaceX (bar the landing of the sixth flight)?
Yes, and due to the delay with Boeing they extended SpaceX's contract by an additional 5 flights

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th August 2023
quotequote all
Flooble said:
With Starliner only rated to launch on Atlas, and all the Atlas boosters now booked, what booster would Boeing use to launch any other Starliner missions?
My feeling is that they are hoping NASA will pay for man-rating the Vulcan, rather than Boeing having to pay for it themselves. Not sure who paid to man-rate the Atlas V.

Of course they'd never consider putting it on a Falcon 9 rofl

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Amazing how many companies enter a downward spiral after they get an accountant in charge frown

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Saturday 25th May
quotequote all
They also said the 737 Max was safe to fly...

https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/24/nasa-says-bo...

...and from the NASA side, they also said Challenger was good to go frown

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
48k said:
T minus 3 minutes and 50 seconds and the ground launch sequencer had a hiccup. Whatever happened to just CTRL+ALT+DELETE? smile
Allegedly there is no truth to the rumour that it runs on WindowsME wink

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
It's complicated by the fact it's an instantaneous launch window, because it's on an intercept with the ISS
Would the fact that they're trying for an instantaneous launch window of the first manned test flight indicate that the vehicle lacks the capability to reach the ISS from a lower phasing orbit ?

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Wednesday 5th June
quotequote all
At last !

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Two new helium leaks detected since arrival in orbit, in addition to the one they knew about before launch

There is a possibility they may have to abort the mission and return to Earth, or at least cut their time at the ISS short

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
At the moment I’m not convinced they’re going home on Starliner….
I know that SpaceX are due to launch Crew 9 in early August - I wonder how much they could bring that forward as a 'rescue' mission.

There are a few things they'd have to do first though, like build a couple of suits in Wilmore & Williams' sizes, as their Boeing ones won't be compatible with Dragon's environmental control system or seats.

Then do you disrupt the crew rotation schedule, flying the Crew 8 Dragon up with only a single person aboard leaving two empty seats for the Boeing crew to return in, or can they send up a pair of seats in kit form to retro fit to the Crew 7 Dragon which would be returning soon anyway ?

Alternatively SpaceX may be able to mount an additional mission, or perhaps bump the Polaris Dawn mission to a later date and use that spacecraft for a rescue.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
Even if they do manage to return it safely, Boeing will face a mountain of work to convince NASA it is safe to fly again

MartG

Original Poster:

20,819 posts

207 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
I wonder if it is possible to fly it back unmanned ?

That way if it does explode/burn up/smack into the desert at high speed at least it won't have killed anyone.