The Moon Mission
Discussion
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Eric Mc said:
It was extremely politically INCONVENIENT as even by 1966 the US realised it was costing a huge amount of money and even by then the desire to beat the Soviets in space was far less pressing than it had been in 1961.
And faking any of what was done on these missions at that time would not only have been even more expensive, it would not have been possible.
Anybody who really thinks the Apollo programme was faked is not only an idiot, they are a deluded idiot who doesn’t realise how much of an idiot they really are.
Spoken like a religious zealot. And faking any of what was done on these missions at that time would not only have been even more expensive, it would not have been possible.
Anybody who really thinks the Apollo programme was faked is not only an idiot, they are a deluded idiot who doesn’t realise how much of an idiot they really are.
98elise said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
I've always had my doubts. Not so much about the science of whether it is/was actually possible. More because it was so politically convenient, and it would be far easier, cheaper and safer to fake it than to actually do it.
How do the Russians fit into that hypothesis?It was a massive PR coup at the height of the cold war. To say there's no room for any doubt seems ludicrous to me.
Eric Mc said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
ITo say there's no room for any doubt seems ludicrous to me.
Only because you know nothing about the subject. Ignorance can get you a long way - even if you are 100% wrong.jameswills said:
Exactly. The irony is lost
It's funny how there are a couple of hot button subjects that really infuriate people. As though it should be evident to anyone with a passing interest that this rather strange episode from 60 years ago was absolutely genuine and any doubt at all about it can only be malice or stupidity.JuanCarlosFandango said:
It's funny how there are a couple of hot button subjects that really infuriate people. As though it should be evident to anyone with a passing interest that this rather strange episode from 60 years ago was absolutely genuine and any doubt at all about it can only be malice or stupidity.
It's because the evidence for the moon landings having taken place is so overwhelming that to doubt them is ridiculous.I assume you know there were six landings, not just one?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
jameswills said:
Exactly. The irony is lost
It's funny how there are a couple of hot button subjects that really infuriate people. As though it should be evident to anyone with a passing interest that this rather strange episode from 60 years ago was absolutely genuine and any doubt at all about it can only be malice or stupidity.paulguitar said:
It's because the evidence for the moon landings having taken place is so overwhelming that to doubt them is ridiculous.
I assume you know there were six landings, not just one?
Are they? Have you actually looked. Have you interviewed Neil Armstrong about it? Oh no….. he went underground immediately I assume you know there were six landings, not just one?
jameswills said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
jameswills said:
Exactly. The irony is lost
It's funny how there are a couple of hot button subjects that really infuriate people. As though it should be evident to anyone with a passing interest that this rather strange episode from 60 years ago was absolutely genuine and any doubt at all about it can only be malice or stupidity.jameswills said:
paulguitar said:
You're not being shouted at. It's somewhere between pity and disbelief.
Why pity? I don’t care if you believe the nonsense, why should you care if believe the non nonsense?Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff