Subaru WRX Hawkeye 2.5L

Subaru WRX Hawkeye 2.5L

Author
Discussion

Robinder1969

Original Poster:

2 posts

51 months

Thursday 30th July 2020
quotequote all
looking for a Scooby around £5k (ish). How bad are the Hawkeye engines and are there specific years to avoid like the plague. I had a 2004 Blobby and it was great but prices for tgese are keen to say the least.

Thanks in advance.

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Friday 31st July 2020
quotequote all
2.5 engine is a weak spot , not all fail , look for a forged engine , more power not a good tune , then a higher chance of failure

anonymous-user

60 months

Friday 31st July 2020
quotequote all
I'd go for a 2.0 personally.

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Saturday 1st August 2020
quotequote all
the 2 litre in a jdm sti plus a twin scroll is a good engine , the 2.5 out of the box is a great engine to drive but has its weakness

PomBstard

7,046 posts

248 months

Sunday 2nd August 2020
quotequote all
I'm not sure of the differences with the 2.5 in the Hawkeye, but my car is a 2012 with the 2.5 giving 195kW/261bhp from the factory. Its now 8 years old, with 135,000km on it and still running fine - uses no oil between services and runs sweet. Google tells me that a Hawkeye of 07'ish vintage would be putting out about 169kW/225bhp as standard, so should be OK.

The proviso on all of that is the maintenance that's been carried out, when and by whom.

Pupbelly

1,413 posts

135 months

Monday 3rd August 2020
quotequote all
Elatino1 said:
I'd go for a 2.0 personally.
This^^^

With a 2.5 its not a case of 'if' it fails it is 'when'. Depends a lot on maintenance, state of tune and fuel used, but even then they are a concern for long term ownership.

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Monday 3rd August 2020
quotequote all
The 2.5 are prone to failures , not all have broken as you often only hear when they break rather than people saying they are still working , there are cars with forged engines out there , a standard 2 litre v a standard 2.5 both remapped is streets apart , the 2.5 produces much more torque and power and is a lot more drive able , the nearest you can get to a 2.5 with more reliability is a twin scroll 2 litre so there fore a jdm sti , the benefit of twin scroll is the reduction in lag , my fsti is in full boost around 2200 rpm which makes it very drive able , i have had to get a couple of 2.5 rebuilds done (always do a full rebuild as if hg has gone bottom end will go ) but my choice would always be a 2.5 engine , so worth looking for forged engine cars based on who built it , arp head bolts are a must

Robinder1969

Original Poster:

2 posts

51 months

Monday 3rd August 2020
quotequote all
Terrific guys thank you. I am limited to buying a "no more than 10 years old, less than 120,000 miles" car due to finance reasons but all the above is great.

Scooobydont

404 posts

200 months

Monday 3rd August 2020
quotequote all
I have no association with the seller but this looks quite nice (except for the alloys!) and it's forged with brembos:

https://www.gumtree.com/p/subaru/subaru-impreza-wr...



I am guilty of having a non forged 2.5 running 350bhp, no issues (touch wood) yet, any excuse for a pic:

I have money set aside if the worst does happen, the car has had a fortune spent on it both mechanically and cosmetically prior to me owning it, I plan to keep it along time:





I am not brand loyal but this is my 2nd (first was a blobeye WRX estate), they are truly amazing cars, nothing else I have ever owned drives like them.

anonymous-user

60 months

Monday 3rd August 2020
quotequote all
vxr2010 said:
The 2.5 are prone to failures , not all have broken as you often only hear when they break rather than people saying they are still working , there are cars with forged engines out there , a standard 2 litre v a standard 2.5 both remapped is streets apart , the 2.5 produces much more torque and power and is a lot more drive able , the nearest you can get to a 2.5 with more reliability is a twin scroll 2 litre so there fore a jdm sti , the benefit of twin scroll is the reduction in lag , my fsti is in full boost around 2200 rpm which makes it very drive able , i have had to get a couple of 2.5 rebuilds done (always do a full rebuild as if hg has gone bottom end will go ) but my choice would always be a 2.5 engine , so worth looking for forged engine cars based on who built it , arp head bolts are a must
The 2.0 twin scroll JDM STi produced more torque than the 2.5 litre STi out of the factory.
I did a lot of work with Owen Developments to produce a series of great bolt on twin scroll turbo's for the STi, i wouldn't touch a 2.5 given the choice now.

Stock 2.5 STi's can be reliable, but the 2.0 is a much better bet.