Subaru WRX Hawkeye 2.5L
Discussion
I'm not sure of the differences with the 2.5 in the Hawkeye, but my car is a 2012 with the 2.5 giving 195kW/261bhp from the factory. Its now 8 years old, with 135,000km on it and still running fine - uses no oil between services and runs sweet. Google tells me that a Hawkeye of 07'ish vintage would be putting out about 169kW/225bhp as standard, so should be OK.
The proviso on all of that is the maintenance that's been carried out, when and by whom.
The proviso on all of that is the maintenance that's been carried out, when and by whom.
The 2.5 are prone to failures , not all have broken as you often only hear when they break rather than people saying they are still working , there are cars with forged engines out there , a standard 2 litre v a standard 2.5 both remapped is streets apart , the 2.5 produces much more torque and power and is a lot more drive able , the nearest you can get to a 2.5 with more reliability is a twin scroll 2 litre so there fore a jdm sti , the benefit of twin scroll is the reduction in lag , my fsti is in full boost around 2200 rpm which makes it very drive able , i have had to get a couple of 2.5 rebuilds done (always do a full rebuild as if hg has gone bottom end will go ) but my choice would always be a 2.5 engine , so worth looking for forged engine cars based on who built it , arp head bolts are a must
I have no association with the seller but this looks quite nice (except for the alloys!) and it's forged with brembos:
https://www.gumtree.com/p/subaru/subaru-impreza-wr...
I am guilty of having a non forged 2.5 running 350bhp, no issues (touch wood) yet, any excuse for a pic:
I have money set aside if the worst does happen, the car has had a fortune spent on it both mechanically and cosmetically prior to me owning it, I plan to keep it along time:
I am not brand loyal but this is my 2nd (first was a blobeye WRX estate), they are truly amazing cars, nothing else I have ever owned drives like them.
https://www.gumtree.com/p/subaru/subaru-impreza-wr...
I am guilty of having a non forged 2.5 running 350bhp, no issues (touch wood) yet, any excuse for a pic:
I have money set aside if the worst does happen, the car has had a fortune spent on it both mechanically and cosmetically prior to me owning it, I plan to keep it along time:
I am not brand loyal but this is my 2nd (first was a blobeye WRX estate), they are truly amazing cars, nothing else I have ever owned drives like them.
vxr2010 said:
The 2.5 are prone to failures , not all have broken as you often only hear when they break rather than people saying they are still working , there are cars with forged engines out there , a standard 2 litre v a standard 2.5 both remapped is streets apart , the 2.5 produces much more torque and power and is a lot more drive able , the nearest you can get to a 2.5 with more reliability is a twin scroll 2 litre so there fore a jdm sti , the benefit of twin scroll is the reduction in lag , my fsti is in full boost around 2200 rpm which makes it very drive able , i have had to get a couple of 2.5 rebuilds done (always do a full rebuild as if hg has gone bottom end will go ) but my choice would always be a 2.5 engine , so worth looking for forged engine cars based on who built it , arp head bolts are a must
The 2.0 twin scroll JDM STi produced more torque than the 2.5 litre STi out of the factory.I did a lot of work with Owen Developments to produce a series of great bolt on twin scroll turbo's for the STi, i wouldn't touch a 2.5 given the choice now.
Stock 2.5 STi's can be reliable, but the 2.0 is a much better bet.
Gassing Station | Subaru | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff