Outback info required

Outback info required

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
I've been asking for car advice on here for a couple of weeks now so I apologise if I'm annoying people!

I'm in the market for a comfortable automatic and four wheel drive and reliability would be a nice bonus. After looking at the A6 and Volvo xc70 I'm now also considering the outback.

My budget is £7000 and the ar will be used for my 14 mile commute which is about 50/50 fast b road and stop start traffic. I'm not concerned by outright performance as I have something else for fun so is the 3.0 worth it over 2.5. Is there anything I should be looking at service wise and any common faults?

Thanks for any help, hopefully I'll be buying very soon so no more what car threads for a while!

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

232 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
Foresters don't come in 3.0Ltr guise, they are 2.0Ltr and 2.5ltr, you might be thinking of a Legacy Outback.

For £7K you should be able to pick up a nice Forester 2.5XT in very good condition with reasonable mileage and a full service history.

They are not slow by any stretch and corner well for what they are. If you want something to get you through a bad winter, muddy fields and get you down B roads fairly swiftly in the crappiest weather you can't go wrong with a Forester.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
For a nice 2.5 Forester you could get one for under £4k now. The older 2.0s are even less than that.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
Thanks fellas, I'm really just looking at outbacks. I'm not sure where the confusion came from, I can't see a mention of them in my OP?

I'm just interested in the differences between the 2.5 and 3.0 outbacks. I don't care about performance but is the fuel saving on the 2.5 worth it? Are there any big service items I should look for or main problems I should be aware of?

Again, I'm sorry if I've confused but I've read it back and can't find a mention of the Forrester in my OP although I'll consider it if it's better!

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
Yeah, I wondered where the Forester reference came from. I don't know if they are any better as I haven't owned an Outback but I've been happy with my Forester.

They seem to be cheaper to buy and parts prices seem lower than the Outback.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Yeah, I wondered where the Forester reference came from. I don't know if they are any better as I haven't owned an Outback but I've been happy with my Forester.

They seem to be cheaper to buy and parts prices seem lower than the Outback.
Hmmm, it's definitely one to consider then. I'm really set on an auto and the 4 speed in the Forrester put me off a bit. What sort of mpg do you get from the Forrester?

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

232 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
Sorry, that was entirely my fault. It was late and my new meds are clearly very strong. I'll get back in my box now. biggrin

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
sebdangerfield said:
Hmmm, it's definitely one to consider then. I'm really set on an auto and the 4 speed in the Forrester put me off a bit. What sort of mpg do you get from the Forrester?
I get about 27mpg with a similar commute make up to yours but over about 20 miles each way.

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

232 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
The only time the OP mentions Outback is in the title of this thread but not in the post. If the title had clicked properly in my head there would be no confusion, my bad!! smile

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
Haha, no worries. I thought I'd said some code or something!

27 mpg isn't too bad. Is that with the 2.0? It's probably putting me off the outback at 3.0 and automatic. I reckon about 24 mpg?

rovermorris999

5,236 posts

195 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
The 3 litre engine is a peach and chain cam so no belt change to pay for. I doubt the fuel consumption would be much worse than a 2.5.

SrMoreno

546 posts

152 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
sebdangerfield said:
Haha, no worries. I thought I'd said some code or something!

27 mpg isn't too bad. Is that with the 2.0? It's probably putting me off the outback at 3.0 and automatic. I reckon about 24 mpg?
On our 2006 3.0l auto Outback we've been getting late 20s on a run (60mph roads), teens around town. I haven't got any experience of the other engines.

I looked at the Forester and Outback, and the Outback felt like a class above. Depends on what you need, though.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Thursday 25th October 2012
quotequote all
I'd struggle to justify teens but mid to late 20s I could handle.

Thanks for the input folks. I'm off work now so ill start going around some places tomorrow. Who knows what I'll end up with!

74merc

595 posts

198 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
I've got a 55 plate 3.0 litre Outback and over the last 8K miles I've averaged 27.9mpg according to the computer. I'm running mine on gas so not really too bothered about the fuel consumption. I did consider buying a Forester but couldn't get past the cheap looking interior. As far as a compromise on comfort/performance/reliability/price goes, I reckon it has to be the best value on the roads today. Also no DMF, DPF or cambelts to worry about, a no-brainer for me.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
74merc said:
I've got a 55 plate 3.0 litre Outback and over the last 8K miles I've averaged 27.9mpg according to the computer. I'm running mine on gas so not really too bothered about the fuel consumption. I did consider buying a Forester but couldn't get past the cheap looking interior. As far as a compromise on comfort/performance/reliability/price goes, I reckon it has to be the best value on the roads today. Also no DMF, DPF or cambelts to worry about, a no-brainer for me.
That sounds perfect. I looked into LPG but the only ones I found were 2.5s converted by Mnt LPG who seem to have a bit of a reputation. They're quite a way from me too so it would be 100 miles to go ack to the fitter to sort the inevitable teething problems.