Non playing staff getting reduced/no wages

Non playing staff getting reduced/no wages

Author
Discussion

Brew

Original Poster:

433 posts

254 months

Tuesday 31st March 2020
quotequote all
With the recent news about non playing staff from Newcastle and Spurs receiving reduced or no wages - why are the multi millionaire players not stepping up and giving some of their over inflated wages to these people?

Pieman68

4,264 posts

241 months

Tuesday 31st March 2020
quotequote all
Some have. I see the morals or Mr Bielsa at work here

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52048216

Dirty Leeds wink

TwigtheWonderkid

44,649 posts

157 months

Wednesday 1st April 2020
quotequote all
I don't see why Mezut Ozil should take a pay cut, he's doing no less now than he was beforehand.

Byker28i

67,912 posts

224 months

Wednesday 1st April 2020
quotequote all
It's using the govt provided money, furlough staff and give them 80% of salary, they aren't allowed to top up. It's mostly been done for Facilities and ground staff. Staff stay at home and get paid 80% for not working.

If the lockdown continues and revenue doesn't come in then I guess we'll see what happens then.

PFA are meeting today to discuss players wages

If the games aren't played, its reported clubs could owe broadcasters £700m payback...

Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 1st April 12:58

48k

13,951 posts

155 months

Wednesday 1st April 2020
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I don't see why Mezut Ozil should take a pay cut, he's doing no less now than he was beforehand.
Was about to say - there's a few players who have furloughed themselves for the last couple of seasons already.

SydneyBridge

9,408 posts

165 months

Wednesday 1st April 2020
quotequote all

eyebeebe

3,175 posts

240 months

Wednesday 1st April 2020
quotequote all
As I understand it, footballers pay a good deal more tax than 10 or 20 years ago. Would these politicians be happy with a corresponding decrease in the tax take, leaving more to be borrowed.

I don‘t disagree with the sentiment and I think players should be impacted before those on more normal salaries, I just don‘t think the consequences have been thought through.

anonymous-user

61 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
eyebeebe said:
As I understand it, footballers pay a good deal more tax than 10 or 20 years ago. Would these politicians be happy with a corresponding decrease in the tax take, leaving more to be borrowed.

I don‘t disagree with the sentiment and I think players should be impacted before those on more normal salaries, I just don‘t think the consequences have been thought through.
As long as the reduction in tax is less than the subsidies they’ll be giving he other means, I doubt they’ll care.

Unbelievable that football clubs that have been ridiculously profligate with players salaries for decades should get any help.

Puggit

48,792 posts

255 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all

Puggit

48,792 posts

255 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
eyebeebe said:
As I understand it, footballers pay a good deal more tax than 10 or 20 years ago. Would these politicians be happy with a corresponding decrease in the tax take, leaving more to be borrowed.

I don‘t disagree with the sentiment and I think players should be impacted before those on more normal salaries, I just don‘t think the consequences have been thought through.
Fine - players can afford to give money from their full wages after tax too.

Driver101

14,376 posts

128 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
I think it's absolutely stinking that with the money in the premier league clubs have done this. They should be forced to address their internal budgets before requiring government assistance for low paid workers.

I'm sure hard working fans that struggle to pay for tickets, and are losing their jobs, will become frustrated.

GT72

6,034 posts

186 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
The Players wage bill for Manchester United in 2019 was £332,000,000 per annum.

If the players took a 10% paycut for the duration of the pandemic, it would free up the equivalent of £33,200,000 per annum. I can't believe the groundsmen, cleaners, cooks and bar staff are being paid £33,200,000 per annum.

If they took the paycut for 3 months, David De Gea's annual income would drop from £19,500,000 to £19,000,000 per annum. I doubt he'd need to visit a foodbank.

The Premier League Clubs really should be ashamed of themselves, absolutely disgusting behaviour.

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

61 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
This will bite them on their arse, rightly so as well.

272BHP

5,780 posts

243 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
Someone has to step up and lead from the front here. Harry Kane, being the England captain should be that man.

Footballers are at least a week late from offering up a chunk of their salaries. Leave it any later and I suspect they will regret their lack of action.

ChocolateFrog

28,577 posts

180 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all


He might be a tt but he's a tt with a point.

unident

6,702 posts

58 months

Thursday 2nd April 2020
quotequote all
Puggit said:
That is fantastic and the threat should be brought to life.

Type R Tom

4,027 posts

156 months

Friday 3rd April 2020
quotequote all
I'm sure footballers will have bills every month like the rest of us but I would hope they would have taken sufficient finical advice over the years to be able to lose 50% of their wages and not get into trouble, plus have a rainy day fund. After all, they never know when their contracts could change.

If they need to start paying Sky back, for example, they are going to have to make some cuts somewhere, it has to be players' wages.

I Will follow the announcement tomorrow with interest but from a PR point of view, they have to do something significant.

EDIT: Looks like it could be 30% reduction

Edited by Type R Tom on Friday 3rd April 16:55

Brew

Original Poster:

433 posts

254 months

Friday 3rd April 2020
quotequote all
Type R Tom said:
I'm sure footballers will have bills every month like the rest of us but I would hope they would have taken sufficient finical advice over the years to be able to lose 50% of their wages and not get into trouble, plus have a rainy day fund. After all, they never know when their contracts could change.

Edited by Type R Tom on Friday 3rd April 16:55
The average wage in the premiership is £3m per year. They will barely be able to keep the leccy going with a 50% wage cut!!

Poor show that the players aren't coming out and offering this themselves.



Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

61 months

Friday 3rd April 2020
quotequote all
Brew said:
The average wage in the premiership is £3m per year. They will barely be able to keep the leccy going with a 50% wage cut!!

Poor show that the players aren't coming out and offering this themselves.
Name some you think would do that ?

There is a name for such people......

unident

6,702 posts

58 months

Friday 3rd April 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
Name some you think would do that ?

There is a name for such people......
Not sure what you mean, but a few managers have taken pay cuts, some teams have deferred wages, some have sacrificed them to a significant figure and the Manchester United squad today announced they’d be donating 30% of their wages for a month to the NHS

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1264483/M...

Just to add I think the timing has made the gesture a bit convenient, but it is a great start. I’d like to see more following suit quickly.

Edited by unident on Friday 3rd April 19:46