The Official England Thread- The Team We All Support [Vol 3]
Discussion
The ref for the Netherlands game is an odd choice....odd in that how come a referee with form for taking a bribe is still in a job !
He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
Bluevanman said:
The ref for the Netherlands game is an odd choice....odd in that how come a referee with form for taking a bribe is still in a job !
He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
While that news story is also nuanced that way, clearly it was Bellingham who had history with the ref, given the former got fined for moaning about him after a game, deliberately referencing the (non-Bundesliga) legal case from several years earlier.He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
Edited by Flip Martian on Tuesday 9th July 09:11
Bluevanman said:
The ref for the Netherlands game is an odd choice....odd in that how come a referee with form for taking a bribe is still in a job !
He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
Oh no excuses in early ?He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
epom said:
Bluevanman said:
The ref for the Netherlands game is an odd choice....odd in that how come a referee with form for taking a bribe is still in a job !
He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
Oh no excuses in early ?He also has history with Bellingham.
https://news.sky.com/story/euro-2024-why-england-s...
Flip Martian said:
Arrivalist said:
Or just a simple observation.
Well, more like "journalist digs into background of referee in the hope he can find something to write about".Flip Martian said:
Arrivalist said:
Or just a simple observation.
Well, more like "journalist digs into background of referee in the hope he can find something to write about".But anyone who’s got form for taking bribes has to be seen as ‘odd’ imo.
Arrivalist said:
Flip Martian said:
Arrivalist said:
Or just a simple observation.
Well, more like "journalist digs into background of referee in the hope he can find something to write about".But anyone who’s got form for taking bribes has to be seen as ‘odd’ imo.
epom said:
Arrivalist said:
Flip Martian said:
Arrivalist said:
Or just a simple observation.
Well, more like "journalist digs into background of referee in the hope he can find something to write about".But anyone who’s got form for taking bribes has to be seen as ‘odd’ imo.
Blackpuddin said:
Flip Martian said:
Arrivalist said:
Or just a simple observation.
Well, more like "journalist digs into background of referee in the hope he can find something to write about".Not defending the ref but I assume the offence (in 2005) he committed wasn't a "we will give you this money if you make sure xx wins" type offence. He was guilty of receiving money from another official who had already been banned for similar. That he was only barred for 6 months points to PERHAPS his actual offence wasn't seen as that serious.
Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
Flip Martian said:
Not defending the ref but I assume the offence (in 2005) he committed wasn't a "we will give you this money if you make sure xx wins" type offence. He was guilty of receiving money from another official who had already been banned for similar. That he was only barred for 6 months points to PERHAPS his actual offence wasn't seen as that serious.
Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
The reason he got only a 6 month ban is because he gave evidence against the ringleader, who was banned for life. Akin to plea bargaining, as I've read the various reports.Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
Bonefish Blues said:
Flip Martian said:
Not defending the ref but I assume the offence (in 2005) he committed wasn't a "we will give you this money if you make sure xx wins" type offence. He was guilty of receiving money from another official who had already been banned for similar. That he was only barred for 6 months points to PERHAPS his actual offence wasn't seen as that serious.
Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
The reason he got only a 6 month ban is because he gave evidence against the ringleader, who was banned for life. Akin to plea bargaining, as I've read the various reports.Given it was 19 years ago, he seems to have managed to still have a decent ref career, if UEFA chose him to be in the Euros, despite his history.
I think blanket making "he should have been banned for life" comments without seeing the facts of the case are a bit knee jerk. And Bellingham was an idiot to even bring it up.
In any case I am in the why chance it crowd it’s a massive game why not just find another ref
dvshannow said:
Or was he? It’s going to be an interesting situation if Bellingham finds himself being appraised for a potential yellow card offence … ref will not want to look like holding a grudge nor afraid to take action
In any case I am in the why chance it crowd it’s a massive game why not just find another ref
Michael Oliver or Anthony Taylor are available.... In any case I am in the why chance it crowd it’s a massive game why not just find another ref
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff