Evora /Evora "S"
Discussion
Not IMO. To me the S is a bit quicker, more torque, but found it to be a bit of a lazier drive and not quite as exciting. Thats just me though. I like the revvy nature of the NA. The S would certainly be a nicer car to drive as a GT with the extra low down oomph
However, if I change my NA for another Evora I think I will go for the S. Sounds daft I know, but at least that way I could justify it to myself
£10k could take you on a few damn good holidays!
However, if I change my NA for another Evora I think I will go for the S. Sounds daft I know, but at least that way I could justify it to myself
£10k could take you on a few damn good holidays!
justin220 said:
Not IMO. To me the S is a bit quicker, more torque, but found it to be a bit of a lazier drive and not quite as exciting. Thats just me though. I like the revvy nature of the NA. The S would certainly be a nicer car to drive as a GT with the extra low down oomph
I drove the Evora S, followed by the normally aspirated Evora IPS and I'd be inclined to agree. You notice the extra punch of the Evora S in the mid-range, but keep the revs up in the n/a car and it's not a huge difference.A normally aspirated car with the pre-cats removed and a change of exhaust and air intake will apparently get you in the 300bhp region too.
S if you want to do track days or you want to tweak it, as they respond very well to a set of manifolds and an intake. Also, if mine is anything to go by they seem to loosen up and get a bit quicker with miles.
Personally I like the extra midrange for every day driving, but I wouldnt argue with someone who would rather have the lower price and better fuel economy.
Personally I like the extra midrange for every day driving, but I wouldnt argue with someone who would rather have the lower price and better fuel economy.
Gassing Station | Evora | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff