Question for weight lifters/strength builders

Question for weight lifters/strength builders

Author
Discussion

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
A top rock climber talks about going for the pump, then letting it subside with lighter training and then considers it that you're ready for the real work in terms of training the body when the pump has gone. Is this really correct?

To expand, if it were weight lifting, you do some light bicep curls then some heavy ones, get the biceps pumped, rest a few minutes, do some more light ones, stretch, shake the arms out, do some more light ones, the pump should subside, then you hit the big weights. This is supposedly a good way to develop strength. Comments?

(I'll try to find proof online later on.)

ApexJimi

25,721 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
The weightlifting analogy you use, reads to me like a mix of hypertrophy training and strength training in the one go.

Interesting concept, but can't say I've ever used it (or in weighlifting terms, heard of it....)

ETA: Who is the top climber in question?

Edited by ApexJimi on Thursday 4th November 11:32

Morba

621 posts

184 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
Something to do with getting 'fresh' blood (oxygenated) around the body so that it is properly fueled and ready to go?

ApexJimi

25,721 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
Which is in essence, the "warm up" phase.

What shadow's talking about is doing a light set inbetween a heavy set. Effectively super-setting between heavy and light.

Animal

5,337 posts

275 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
Surely you're just wasting energy by doing all of these sub-maximal sets?

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
http://www.neilgresham.com/

He's big in the UK scene. His two "Masterclass" DVDs alone transformed my climbing. Considering getting some 1-to-1 coaching with him.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
Yes, light (warm up), heavy, light, heavy and sustained. Talks about getting over the first pump and then you're really ready for the big work.

Animal said:
Surely you're just wasting energy by doing all of these sub-maximal sets?
That's what I thought.

ApexJimi

25,721 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th November 2010
quotequote all
Animal said:
Surely you're just wasting energy by doing all of these sub-maximal sets?
yes

That's what I'd say.

Lost_BMW

12,955 posts

183 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Never heard of or seen anyone do or recommend this type of approach.

Usually for strength (as you asked, rather than size) the ideas usually pushed are:

moderate warm ups (which don't have to pump the muscles - this could cause some congestion that could hamper the maximal set + is working different fibre types/processes) to low rep sets, not many of and decent rest between them

maybe then lighter/drop sets to keep the reps in the desired band

or as a pump set at the end to flush blood/nutrients in and waste products out

or the possibly 'old fashioned' pyramid approach working to failure-ish on each set even though the weight is to go up and the reps down.

Also some workouts/sets with heavy weights used through limited range of the movement to help with sticking points (e.g. shoulder press through the top part of the motion to work the triceps/lock out more)


For me the best gains in strength have come from (mainly) the first but also with a twist where if I think I can get say 5 reps at weight n I might also add (or do 1st) a lower rep set at n +[/n] say 20% then find I can do more at [i]n than I would have been able to do otherwise.


For climbing though wouldn't you be after a different aspect of strength? So, not low rep max abilities but the ability to keep the strength up for a time + maybe more emphasis on static positions/holds? Might well need a different approach if so?

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Yeah, those methods sound familiar. As I hinted, it's about sustained strength ie endurance... but is this the best way?

Lost_BMW

12,955 posts

183 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
Yeah, those methods sound familiar. As I hinted, it's about sustained strength ie endurance... but is this the best way?
God knows! But I wouldn't like 'him' meant God! to find out by falling off a cliff face if the training had been wrong! Sorry HTH angel

Edited by Lost_BMW on Friday 5th November 12:12

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Lost_BMW said:
ShadownINja said:
Yeah, those methods sound familiar. As I hinted, it's about sustained strength ie endurance... but is this the best way?
God knows! But I wouldn't like him to find out by falling off a cliff face if the training had been wrong! Sorry HTH angel
hehe

Well, it seems to work for him. Or perhaps it would work better if he didn't use this method. Who knows. I wonder if there's a good way of discovering which is best.

ApexJimi

25,721 posts

250 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Shadow - who is this top climber?


Lost_BMW

12,955 posts

183 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
Lost_BMW said:
ShadownINja said:
Yeah, those methods sound familiar. As I hinted, it's about sustained strength ie endurance... but is this the best way?
God knows! But I wouldn't like 'him' meant God! to find out by falling off a cliff face if the training had been wrong! Sorry HTH angel
hehe

Well, it seems to work for him. Or perhaps it would work better if he didn't use this method. Who knows. I wonder if there's a good way of discovering which is best.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Sort it out, LostBMW.

ApexJimi said:
Shadow - who is this top climber?
ShadownINja said:
http://www.neilgresham.com/

He's big in the UK scene. His two "Masterclass" DVDs alone transformed my climbing. Considering getting some 1-to-1 coaching with him.
Edited by ShadownINja on Friday 5th November 12:15

ApexJimi

25,721 posts

250 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
Shadow, have you looked at any of Dave MacLeod's stuff?

His book, "9 out of 10 climbers" is supposed to be rather good indeed.


ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,473 posts

289 months

Friday 5th November 2010
quotequote all
ApexJimi said:
Shadow, have you looked at any of Dave MacLeod's stuff?

His book, "9 out of 10 climbers" is supposed to be rather good indeed.
Yeah, just trying to discover if Gresham's ideas are correct or not, that's all. smile