Trainers (footwear) - How far is too far?

Trainers (footwear) - How far is too far?

Author
Discussion

UncleRic

Original Poster:

937 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Lounge or Health Matters, Lounge or Health Matters..

My current pair of trainers have covered >1,500 miles of on road and cross country running. I've worn them in two different seas and on three different continents, used in temperatures down to -6c and upwards of +45c. They've been caked in mud, covered in sand and salt, have been through old abandoned mines and up the side of a 2,000m mountain. They've even come within a few cm of being attacked by an angry snake..

I did another 24 miles of blister-free cross country this weekend and my trainers are still offering good, pain-free support.

So, how far is too far and do I just keep using them until they (or my feet) start to fall to bits?

DeputyDawg

527 posts

186 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Normally 300-400 miles is the going rate before you replace them. So my guess is that your current pair are well over due.


Do they look like this by any chance...smile




Edited by DeputyDawg on Monday 6th September 09:31

UncleRic

Original Poster:

937 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
DeputyDawg said:
Do they look like this by any chance...smile
In all honesty, they still look pretty good. The soles look a little worn and they are quite scuffed, but no rips or frays and I'm even still on the original pair of laces!

In large, my post is slightly tongue-in-cheek. I'm actually buying another pair this week, but I've been very impressed with the way this pair have held up to literally everything I could possibly throw at them.

Bill

54,207 posts

262 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
yes I've got a pair of good walking boots that have done similar and they're fked so you must be incredibly light on your feet or deluded as to how sagged your shoes are wink

Do your feet actually touch the ground?

UncleRic

Original Poster:

937 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Bill said:
yes I've got a pair of good walking boots that have done similar and they're fked so you must be incredibly light on your feet or deluded as to how sagged your shoes are wink
Maybe I've got some form of trainer-dsymorphia-syndrome.. nuts

Bill

54,207 posts

262 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
biggrin

Silver940

3,961 posts

234 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
What are they, sound like good VFM.

Muzzer

3,814 posts

228 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
UncleRic said:
In large, my post is slightly tongue-in-cheek. I'm actually buying another pair this week, but I've been very impressed with the way this pair have held up to literally everything I could possibly throw at them.
What have you got at the moment?

My current running trainers are circa 5 years old and have covered about 2000 miles.

But I'm loathe to replace them. They fit, I don't get blisters, they're not falling apart....they're reliable basically.

I'm probably not getting the right support but I'm putting off going into a shop and paying loads for a pair of running shoes that are a choice between luminous pink or luminous green with scorch-your-eyes-out white detailing and probably won't 'feel' right irked

UncleRic

Original Poster:

937 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Silver940 said:
What are they, sound like good VFM.
They're Asics, (possibly, but can't remember) 'Patriots'. Don't think they cost me very much new, so £'s per mile must be ultra-low!

bales

1,905 posts

225 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Generally if you do regular running either every 300 miles or so or 6 months, its best to have a couple of pairs though and regularly rotate them.

I try and change mine every 6 months even though I don't do massive amount of miles I do run in them most days.

balders118

5,869 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
UncleRic said:
Silver940 said:
What are they, sound like good VFM.
They're Asics, (possibly, but can't remember) 'Patriots'. Don't think they cost me very much new, so £'s per mile must be ultra-low!
I'm pretty sure they're bottom of the range ascis (£30 is), so pretty remarkable. I have a pair of cheap ascis (possibly patriots) and they fell apart after a game of football. Still working though, just not in good shape.

Bill

54,207 posts

262 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
FWIW I regularly see people who've used their shoes for longer than recommended and they invariably haven't noticed how compressed the sole has become, and how it's no longer absorbing impact as it should.

ewenm

28,506 posts

252 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
It's not the sole or the uppers of the trainer that will wear first, it's the midsole, the foam-like cushioning section. If you take your trainers with you to a running shop and compare a new pair with your current pair I reckon you'll be able to feel the difference in how "squashable" the midsole is. The new pair should be a lot firmer.

I replace trainers after 500-600 miles or so, which is 5-6 weeks when I'm in full training. However, as Bales says, I use more than one pair regularly - in a week's training I'll use 3 or 4 different pairs of trainers/spikes depending on the training session.

Bill

54,207 posts

262 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
As Ewen says biggrin

UncleRic

Original Poster:

937 posts

175 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
balders118 said:
UncleRic said:
Silver940 said:
What are they, sound like good VFM.
They're Asics, (possibly, but can't remember) 'Patriots'. Don't think they cost me very much new, so £'s per mile must be ultra-low!
I'm pretty sure they're bottom of the range ascis (£30 is), so pretty remarkable.
Sounds about right price-wise, wasn't expecting much when I bought them but have been very surprised.

The other comment about the mid-sole padding / springyness rings true. They've definatley lost some of the absorbtion but are still far from uncomfortable.

Colonial

13,553 posts

212 months

Tuesday 7th September 2010
quotequote all
It's the absorption I didn't notice that had gone - replaced my asic kayano's just recently.

Done 1500+ on them and they still looked ok. But got a pair of NB 740's recently and it is a world of difference.