Idiot question about radiographers...

Idiot question about radiographers...

Author
Discussion

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
I was thinking... if you spent your whole career playing about with X-ray machines etc, don't you increase the chances of cancer? I know they step out of the room and there's loads of shielding but still... over a 50 year career, could it have some sort of effect? I mean, might you go green and muscley when you get angry? biggrin

Edited by ShadownINja on Monday 28th June 17:49

968

12,004 posts

255 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
I was thinking... if you spent your whole career playing about with X-ray machines etc, don't you increase the chances of cancer? I know they step out of the room and there's loads of shielding but still... over a 50 year career, could it have some sort of effect? I mean, might you go green and muscley when you get angry? biggrin

Edited by ShadownINja on Monday 28th June 17:49
Very unlikely, they go behind lead shields when xrays are taken and wear lead aprons when there is any close proximity work. It used to be the case that radiographers would get skin tumours on their legs, as the shields only shielded their top half. Not so nowadays.

Added to that, they were a badge which has a radiosensitive material in it, if they are overexposed the badge changes to indicate this.

Edited by 968 on Monday 28th June 18:26

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
OIC! And what about feet, hands, face?

nmpjt

15 posts

189 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
Been doing it for 10yrs and still got all my extremities intact, just don't make me angry you wouldn't like me when I'm angry

968

12,004 posts

255 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
OIC! And what about feet, hands, face?
Well when they take an image, and hence are exposed to radiation, they stand behind a shield, which is floor to ceiling, so are never exposed.

AMLK

407 posts

192 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
I have been a radiographer for 13years (16years if you include training), and I am okay. Don't think I go green when angry, but better check with my husband about that!

I actually work in radiotherapy rather than diagnostic, so we are even better protected. The thickness of all the walls around us protects us from any environmental background radiation. Also, like another poster said we wear radiation monitors that are checked monthly and would register very small amounts of radiation.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
968 said:
ShadownINja said:
OIC! And what about feet, hands, face?
Well when they take an image, and hence are exposed to radiation, they stand behind a shield, which is floor to ceiling, so are never exposed.
Oops. I misread what you wrote.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
nmpjt said:
Been doing it for 10yrs and still got all my extremities intact, just don't make me angry you wouldn't like me when I'm angry
hehe Do you find some rather depressing piano tune haunts you wherever you go?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPngawdDa_c

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
AMLK said:
I have been a radiographer for 13years (16years if you include training), and I am okay. Don't think I go green when angry, but better check with my husband about that!

I actually work in radiotherapy rather than diagnostic, so we are even better protected. The thickness of all the walls around us protects us from any environmental background radiation. Also, like another poster said we wear radiation monitors that are checked monthly and would register very small amounts of radiation.
Why did you choose therapy over diagnostic, then?

grumbledoak

31,840 posts

240 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
As far as I can remember it never clearly killed anyone even back before the "pop into a shielded room" days, though no dount it is raising your risk. The only casualty from this that I can think of was Rosalind Franklin.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
Oh, ok. I guess it's the degree to which it increases risk.

Ghisallo

1,136 posts

185 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
My OH is a radiologist. I think CT scans are the big worry for radiation doses as far as patients are concerned but radiographers are well sheilded (different room) so there is no issue for them, same as with most of the other stuff they do. I know she is very careful with what she calls 'portable films' and barium enemas as these would be done closely/directly with the pateint and therefore with less radiation protection. But overall I don't think there is a significant increased amount of cancer with people in that line of work.

Alex lindsay

54 posts

175 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
byebye Hello, we wear lil badges (thermoluminescent detectors TLDs) to check we dont get too much, if there was an incident we would know when our badges get checked

Matt Harper

6,769 posts

208 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
Cath lab environments present a similar x-ray source risk and scattered radiation from both the intensifier and the patient are potentially harmful to clincians - hence the long lead aprons, lead collars and even lead shielded eye protection. Cataract damage can be significantly accelerated by x-ray exposure. The scrub techs and circ nurses tend to alternate on each procedure to minimize exposure - the cardiologist just has to grin and bear it. The mobile lead/glass screens just seem to get in the way, from what I've seen.

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
:-/

Acehood

1,326 posts

181 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
As a patient who's had about 30 x-rays and 3 CT scans I always wonder why I'm left alone in the room when the machinery is on. I should get a geiger counter and measure myself for radiation. Then let one of the radiologists have a go and see if theres much difference

ShadownINja

Original Poster:

77,468 posts

289 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
Acehood said:
As a patient who's had about 30 x-rays and 3 CT scans I always wonder why I'm left alone in the room when the machinery is on. I should get a geiger counter and measure myself for radiation. Then let one of the radiologists have a go and see if theres much difference
30??? You need to quit BASE jumping. You must look like you eat Ready Brek, these days.

Ghisallo

1,136 posts

185 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
Acehood said:
As a patient who's had about 30 x-rays and 3 CT scans I always wonder why I'm left alone in the room when the machinery is on. I should get a geiger counter and measure myself for radiation. Then let one of the radiologists have a go and see if theres much difference
One CT could be around 800 x-rays worth of radiation doses afaik. Do you glow in the dark? hehe

Acehood

1,326 posts

181 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
Ghisallo said:
Acehood said:
As a patient who's had about 30 x-rays and 3 CT scans I always wonder why I'm left alone in the room when the machinery is on. I should get a geiger counter and measure myself for radiation. Then let one of the radiologists have a go and see if theres much difference
One CT could be around 800 x-rays worth of radiation doses afaik. Do you glow in the dark? hehe
Wow did not know that. I don't glow in the dark unfortunately. It'd be cool if I did, or if I had a mutation like an extra arm or something.

Hopefully the one I had the other day will be the last...