Cooper test V02

Author
Discussion

DBSV8

Original Poster:

5,958 posts

245 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 23 November 2010 at 14:49

captainzep

13,305 posts

199 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
Impressive outcome DB.

I like the Cooper test, (actually whilst I'm gasping\staggering along beyond 6-7 minutes I fecking despise it) but its a good way of showing fitness progression when you're starting out and a nice occasional change of routine as part of normal training.

I've never done it on a treadmill, but managed something like 2750m in the 12 minutes (V02 max 50.19) a couple of years ago as a reasonably fit 33 yr old fat bloke on the (flatish) local highways and byeways. -I'd be interested to hear what distance you could cover on a track/road.

E21_Ross

35,697 posts

219 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
yeh i did this about 2 years ago to test our progress with my athletics club, i covered about 3500m and that worked out at about 65 for VO2 max.

have you ever done the bleep test? that's quite a nasty one, got 15.7 for that which was pretty good i thought smile

DBSV8

Original Poster:

5,958 posts

245 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
captainzep said:
Impressive outcome DB.

I like the Cooper test, (actually whilst I'm gasping\staggering along beyond 6-7 minutes I fecking despise it) but its a good way of showing fitness progression when you're starting out and a nice occasional change of routine as part of normal training.

I've never done it on a treadmill, but managed something like 2750m in the 12 minutes (V02 max 50.19) a couple of years ago as a reasonably fit 33 yr old fat bloke on the (flatish) local highways and byeways. -I'd be interested to hear what distance you could cover on a track/road.
I did a bit of maths as I really wanted to break 3km ,

so I used a speed distance calculator ,to estimate times
http://www.machinehead-software.co.uk/bike/speed_d...

the disadvantage with a treadmill it takes around 25 seconds + to go from 0 to reach the required speed.Where as normal running you can go straight to your required speed

I was comfortable running at 14 km/h

So tried 17km/h for 3 mins =0.8500 km
16km/h for 3 mins =0.8000 km
14km/h for 3 mins =0.7000 km
13km/h for 2 mins =0.4333 km
19km/h for 1 mins =0.2467 km

the trouble was the last part was supposed to be a comfortable 13km/h but I realised i hadnt adjusted for the lost time reaching from 0 -17km/h so i wound it up to the maximum which nearly killed me ....



Edited by DBSV8 on Sunday 7th March 13:40

NitroNick

750 posts

217 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
At 15.4 k/p/h you should be able to cover 3 k in 12 mins including the time taken to get up to speed.
Might be wrong. Am off now to try it.

ewenm

28,506 posts

252 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
12min effort (outside on the track, pbs of 8:19 3k, 14:28 5k) would be a 4k+ run if I was reasonably fit - which gives about 78 on the Cooper Test. Can't remember what it was last time I was tested in the lab so don't know how accurate that is...

K87

2,111 posts

194 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
Just worked mine out based on my 10k pace,

2406m with a VO2 of 42.5

Which puts me in the good category. Will have to try my ditance in 12 minute to see what I'm really at as obviouly I would run a fair bit quicker than my 10k pace.