Calling all Cervix owners…

Calling all Cervix owners…

Author
Discussion

Trevatanus

Original Poster:

11,188 posts

155 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
I’m not sure if this is just a symptom of the mad world in which we live, but I never thought I would read a communication like this:

Rufus Stone

7,416 posts

61 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
I picked one up at a local car boot sale recently but I'm sure it's over 25 years old so should have been tested already.

2xChevrons

3,413 posts

85 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
This sort of thing I genuinely don't get what the fuss is about - cervical screening is for people who have a cervix. Not every woman has a cervix (it might have been removed in a hysterectomy), so it's not for all women by default.

It's like all the angst/comedy people found in tampons being marketed to 'people who menstruate'. That's literally the target user base - not all women menstruate, and some young female people who might otherwise be considered girls do menstruate.

And I have quite deliberately not mentioned anything about people who are trans - both those cases relate to entirely 'biological women'.


J4CKO

42,387 posts

205 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
I think it makes sense, as it acknowledges that people may not identify as per the typical Cervix owner, and also doesn't mean they will get caught up in a load of discussion about gender politics/identity or whatever by daring to mention women/females and gender specific anatomy, as it may alienate/offend those who have transitioned or are non binary etc.

So folk read it and ask themselves, do I want my Cervix checking for HPV ?

Its very simple and there are no ifs or buts, whatever you say or feel you are, you either have one or you dont and nothing can change that, well, maybe a Hysterectomy but then the question covers that, you can have it removed but its not like you can add one.

chrispmartha

16,520 posts

134 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
Trevatanus said:
I’m not sure if this is just a symptom of the mad world in which we live, but I never thought I would read a communication like this:
What's the issue?

BikeBikeBIke

9,544 posts

120 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
What if you identify as having a cervix, but don't physically have a cervix?

rpguk

4,480 posts

289 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
Agree with 2xChevrons, also this campaign is aimed at women in their early 20s, who as a group are more in tune to this kind of terminology.

I find it a bit odd myself but I can't argue with the accuracy and I'm not in the target audience.

Earthdweller

14,101 posts

131 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
That tweet doesn’t appear on my search of NHS Borders account ?


This does, maybe they’ve changed ?

https://twitter.com/nhsborders/status/161861351065...

Rufus Stone

7,416 posts

61 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
What if you identify as having a cervix, but don't physically have a cervix?
Just remember to relax when they insert the speculum.

Catastrophic Poo

5,023 posts

191 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
2xChevrons said:
This sort of thing I genuinely don't get what the fuss is about - cervical screening is for people who have a cervix. Not every woman has a cervix (it might have been removed in a hysterectomy), so it's not for all women by default.

It's like all the angst/comedy people found in tampons being marketed to 'people who menstruate'. That's literally the target user base - not all women menstruate, and some young female people who might otherwise be considered girls do menstruate.
Exactly.

Works well to get those frothing who haven’t been near a cervix though hehe

ReallyReallyGood

1,626 posts

135 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.

chrispmartha

16,520 posts

134 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.
What's ridiculous about it?

Cervical cancer is a serious issue why wouldn't they want to be inclusive If it helps get the message out?

How should it be written?

boyse7en

7,011 posts

170 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.
What's ridiculous about it? Seemed very clear, and targets the required audience accurately.

StevieBee

13,329 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.
But it's exclusionary for good reason. If you're a fella who's now a lass, the message doesn't apply to you. If you're a lass without a cervix, it doesn't apply to you. If you're a bloke who used to be a lass, it probably does apply .... the sentence perfectly describes the people who that message is for.

anonymous-user

59 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.
It's literally about cervical cancer. You need a cervix to get that.

2xChevrons

3,413 posts

85 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
But it's the ridiculousness of it.

Do people with one arm get upset when they see TV ads of people selling jumpers? Or do they complain to Ofcom that it's exclusionary because not all people have two arms.
But (to pretty much reiterate my previous post), where's the ridiculousness?

It's not about exclusion or 'upset'. It's about accuracy. The vaccine and the screening is for people with cervixes. If you don't have one, it doesn't affect you, whether you're a woman who used to have one but now doesn't because it was removed, never had one due to a genetic/developmental quirk, or if you are now living as a woman but you were born with male biology. And if you are now living as a man but still have a cervix the message does apply to you.

It's literally the most accurate, targeted and inclusive way of advertising the service there is. If it said "When any woman turns 25 they'll be invited for a cervical screening test" that would be less accurate and less inclusive than the message in the OP. See also: my earlier tampon-selling example.

Biggy Stardust

7,068 posts

49 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
Rufus Stone said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
What if you identify as having a cervix, but don't physically have a cervix?
Just remember to relax when they insert the speculum.
I don't know what exactly you mean but was amused regardless.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

72 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
Mary Bourke has something to say on it.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IDxoOlab0Os

Tigerj

369 posts

101 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
Another ph thread started with a weird transphobic. This thread is either bait or by someone who has no clue.

The tweets hurting no one. Just move on with your life or if you have a cervix, go get it checked.

Rick101

6,986 posts

155 months

Thursday 26th January 2023
quotequote all
I have a cervix every year regardless of low mileage. Will often have an extra oil change too.
Like to keep it in tip top condition and tbh John loves getting in there whenever he can.