Discussion
If you made one that was identical in every respect, from design through to metallurgical composition and it was literally indistinguishable from a Royal Mint produced coin, could it really be called a fake? If the point of origin and issuing body is what determines the value, but there's no traceability (unlike notes with serial numbers) it effectively renders official currency redundant. I can almost understand the push towards digital currency. Obviously the 3 bob note equivalent you have there isn't applicable
I had a temporary job once for the local council. One of my roles was to put all the coins from parking pay machines though a sorter. I always used to look at the fakes it spat out and I could usually spot when I had a fake pound coin in my wallet. I was surprised by how many there are.
The biggest giveaway was the imprint not being perfectly centred on the coin. If you look at the coin above, you can see the distance between the dots and the edge of the coin is greater at the bottom than the top.
The biggest giveaway was the imprint not being perfectly centred on the coin. If you look at the coin above, you can see the distance between the dots and the edge of the coin is greater at the bottom than the top.
The previous generation of £1 coins were very heavily faked, the Mint reckoned up to 3% of the circulation was fake back in 2010. If you took a moment to check, they were usually easy to spot, and not just because of the detailing but basic stuff like the edge mottos not matching the faces.
You'd think if you were making the effort to fake coins, that you'd at least get the basic details right.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff