Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?

Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 19th October 2023
quotequote all
[redacted]

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Saturday 21st October 2023
quotequote all
NRG1976 said:
I think there is a spectrum, so 9/11, flat earth, covid, bill gates, illuminati, lizards etc. are basket case level. The Israel one is not too far removed from a possibility.

False flag is a known geo-political tactic. Equally a few MSM feel hamas operation was designed to destabilise the talks between Saudi Arabia in recognition of Israel being a state etc. etc. so equally on the spectrum of Israel self inflicting.

Edited by NRG1976 on Saturday 21st October 10:35
First, mixing “false flag”, “geo-political” and “MSM” in close proximity screams “I am a level 12 deep thinker” but quietly says the opposite.

Secondly, it’s properly bizarre to compare an objectively rational hypothesis for Hamas’s attack (cleaving relations between Israel and Saudi) with a CT that Israel let it happen to create a pretext to retaliate. One involves A killing its enemy, B, expecting B to respond in such a way as to alienate C. The other involves B allowing its own civilian citizens to be slaughtered so it can kill A’s soldiers and civilians.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Wednesday 15th November 2023
quotequote all
kayc said:
coldel said:
Who_Goes_Blue said:
Hoofy said:
coldel said:
I did do a bit of reading on these guys a couple of years back as they are associated with qanon / capitol raid etc. and they really are just a bunch of people who often are low income, wanting more, feel they are owed, and ironically often involved in fraud and scams to rip other people off.
I think it's down to people being told what they want to hear so they are more easily agreeable to it. I've seen it a lot in my industry (therapy/complementary health). People promising things. Using loose logic to say things that people want to hear. Chuck in a bit of pseudo science, make it sound technical and clever but also use words like "scientific" and "critical thinking" to imply that if you disagree you're... wrong. In the 3 years of my science degree, not once did anyone say "critical thinking". In a word, it's manipulation.
youve summed up pretty much the whole covid debacle right there
Yes, from ideas that drinking bleach cleans it out to all the other misinformation out there that extreme groups were peddling.

I remember one where someone was quoting something from the guy that invented the PCR test I think it was, the guy unfortunately had passed on a few years before who spoke about his PCR testing, but this chap peddled is as true and undiable that the PCR test wasnt fit for purpose. Upon closer inspection it became clear that the quote not only was completely out of context, but actually made up of two different quotes made months apart that had been put together to support some spurious nonsense around it.

Even when I pulled the relevant articles, pointed out that the quote wasnt factual and that the context was completely different - that guy said that it was still relevant. Classic CT behaviour. Even bare faced facts still wouldn't shift his belief in a falsehood. "
So..09/2021..Joe Biden official White House statement designed to scare/influence people..."This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated"...so from your beliefs and trust in authority he was either misinformed or lying..you choose..what we do know is that his statement ,(anyone who questioned it at the time would be a CT as Joe has no reason to mislead), is now factually proved to be incorrect.
That isn't the killer argument you think it is. You've made something up and hinged an opinion around it. The made up bit is: "anyone who questioned it at the time would be a CT as Joe had no reason to mislead". The first part of the sentence is simply untrue and the second part "no reason to mislead" ignores the context of encouraging vaccine uptake and that the vaccinated who caught Covid had better health outcomes. Of course, you don't deal in nuance so, in your opinion, it is simply something that "is now factually proved to be incorrect".

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Wednesday 15th November 2023
quotequote all
kayc said:
coldel said:
kayc said:
ot bored before..so..why do you think that CT's at the time thought Joe was misleading or lying to the public because what he was saying looked illogical and has now been be a proven correct opinion( for a reason yet to be discovered)...or gonna gloss over that as usual?
Making basic and simple mistakes is quite boring I agree. In case you missed it, Nobel Peace Prize is not the Nobel Prize for Medicine. And a nominee, is someone nominated, not a winner. It becomes a lot more interesting when you work that out.

Gloss over? Or simply that it is tiresome saying the same thing to you, that the world isn't binary, that opposing one thing doesn't automatically throw you into the diametrically opposite view. CT opposing everything they were told is very different to a person that evaluates statements on their individual merits and coming to conclusions. Doing the latter does not make you a sheep nor does it make you a CT. When you work that out, the world will become a less confusing and conspiratorial place for you.
So lets clarify..if i said to you in Sept 21 that i thought Biden was either lying or misleading the public for reasons known to him and a few others you wouldnt have said i was a CT?..i think you know the answer to that.
The mistake you’re making is thinking that “lying or misleading “ is the issue (although you are using those terms in an overly pejorative way). The issue is “for reasons known to him and a few others”. There were obvious and legitimate reasons to encourage the vaccine uptake, particularly given the misinformation spread through right-wing social media, but you’re hinting at reasons known only to a few people. Without evidence of what these “reasons” are, it sounds like the start of a conspiracy theory.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 16th November 2023
quotequote all
kayc said:
o..this is becoming a little tiring..see if you can actually answer a straight question...did Biden say in 09/2021 "it is a pandemic of the unvaccinated" to coerce people into being jabbed( factually proven to be incorrect)..anybody who questioned his reasons for saying this for a variety of reasons at the time was considered a CT...
Bold above.

If you can't provide any evidence of this I'd suggest you're flogging a dead horse. It appears to be a figment of your imagination

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 16th November 2023
quotequote all
kayc said:
he problem you have is that in your binary world everyone who questions anything that isnt the 'standard' line is a CT..you seem to not grasp that i and others question certain things that make no sense or appear illogical.There are degrees of CT'ers ..which is where your binary opinion is wrong..i dont think the earth is flat and the King is a lizard..but i sure as hell dont belive LHO killed JFK with a rusty rifle from 200 yards either.
Bold above.

As with Biden - any evidence or, once again, a figment of your imagination?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Tuesday 28th November 2023
quotequote all
markiii said:
5 In a Row said:
Is it all just a result of social media/the internet?

I don't remember so many people having odd views back in the 80s, 90s and 2000s.


I had a look at the Covid 23 thread in N,P & E and can't work out who the conspiracy theorists are among the posters.
It almost feels as if they all are but coming from 2 opposing directions.
I'm sure they had odd views they just didn't have the means of putting them out there were we know about them before social media
Taken from the Cure worse than thread:

jameswills said:
The Rik Mayall film One by One recorded in 2014 is the one to watch, he “died” suddenly soon after and the film seems to have been forgotten by everyone, doesn’t even get a wiki mention.
Looks like Rik didn't have a heart attack after going jogging - Klaus had him done in! Naturally, the film is listed on Wiki....

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Wednesday 29th November 2023
quotequote all
coldel said:
Wow I actually dived right into the rabbit hole on that COVID thread for a look.
Am I reading it right, they genuinely think a low budget movie where they throw out the idea of vaccines killing people then RM dying is evidence of something sinister, is that genuinely what they are saying?
Or is it more along the lines of just highlighting that there was a movie made about the idea of vaccines killing people, and thats it.
I think the gist of the argument is that the film reveals how the world really works (wake up and smell the coffee sheeple!) and in retaliation for this secret being divulged 'they' (Gates, Soros, Schwab, Tony Blair - take your pick) had Rik Mayall killed (hence "died"). I don't think they have thought the argument through - surely more sensible for 'them' to kill the writer or whomever discovered the 'secret' rather than Kevin Turvey? Still, there are a number on that thread who seem to really struggle to separate fact from fiction. I guess they believe the low budget and poorly reviewed drama is a documentary?

The one professional review I found (via IMDb) could be a critique of that thread!:

A cafe worker (Heather Wilson) discovers Earth could be on the verge of apocalypse in this micro-budget Brit-flick. Writer/director Diane Millers feature debut feels less like a film, more a series of paranoid ramblings. At times the conspiracy theories are so ludicrous you half-expect a late twist revealing everything to have been one big parody, but the characters continue speaking the cringeworthy dialogue with the kind of self-satisfaction that the late Rik Mayall (who plays a character unironically named Ernest) used to mock in his most famous roles. Director: Diane Jessie Miller Starring: Steven Macaulay, Rik Mayall, Sean Meyer Theatrical release: 19 June 2015 Stephen Puddicombe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Timothy Bucktu said:
Class66 said:
This is a good link that always shuts the more sneering anti vaxxers up - without fail, when they realise how misinformed they are from their echo chamber nonsense.

The ones who literally wish death on the ‘Jibby jabbed’.

https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/conditio...
Forgive my ignorance, but there's plenty of mainstream news articles linking Myocarditis with the Covid vaccines. I'm not sure what that article has to do with it, apart from detailing the symptoms and treatment?
It obviously has to do with, for example, anti-vaxxers on the ‘cure’ thread who must personally know 1m+ people given the number they know with serious heart conditions (including death) supposedly caused by the Covid vaccines. It demonstrates that they are either stupendously stupid or making things up (certainly the latter but likely combined with the former).

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 7th December 2023
quotequote all
Timothy Bucktu said:
Roman Rhodes said:
Timothy Bucktu said:
Class66 said:
This is a good link that always shuts the more sneering anti vaxxers up - without fail, when they realise how misinformed they are from their echo chamber nonsense.

The ones who literally wish death on the ‘Jibby jabbed’.

https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/conditio...
Forgive my ignorance, but there's plenty of mainstream news articles linking Myocarditis with the Covid vaccines. I'm not sure what that article has to do with it, apart from detailing the symptoms and treatment?
It obviously has to do with, for example, anti-vaxxers on the ‘cure’ thread who must personally know 1m+ people given the number they know with serious heart conditions (including death) supposedly caused by the Covid vaccines. It demonstrates that they are either stupendously stupid or making things up (certainly the latter but likely combined with the former).
Oh, I see.
What are your thoughts on Sweden, Norway, and Finland suspending the use of the Moderna Covid vaccine in young Men, due to concerns over the Myocarditis links?
Are their health regulators just silly anti-vaxxers and stupendously stupid or making it all up?
I mean, if you're a sensible young Man (I say Man, as they seem to be particularly as risk from Myocarditis apparently) you would have got your Covid vaccine assuming it was all perfectly safe, cos that's what we were told I believe? They didn't have a choice of course...Moderna, Pfizer and the now withdrawn in the UK over safety concerns AstraZenca vax.
Anyone hesitant might be forgiven for being so?
You asked a question and I answered it. Now, in typical CT fashion, you veer off at a tangent with irrelevant questions.

You can take yourself back to the Covid thread now, Sealion. wink

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 7th December 2023
quotequote all
Timothy Bucktu said:
And by the way...wishing death on jibby jabbed... Who on earth is doing that?
Either way, Myocarditis isn't like a cold...it can lead serious problems. If the premise was to brush it off as a side effect of the Covid Vaccine in some people, and no big deal - then you have to wonder why some countries are pulling it based on these findings?
One of your fellow loons on the Covid thread was wishing death on the "jibby jabbed" - jameswills

Would you like a fish?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
coldel said:
Have we had any more mentions in those threads? We seem to have riled quite a few of them because we don't fly in to a huge flap shouting at clouds and the like getting in to pointless debates with them about their beliefs.
Apparently this is the "lock me down harder thread" (from Covid cure...). No, I couldn't quite work that out either. Bit of looniness about the Rothschilds and George Soros (possibly one of the more anti-semitic posters has got a ban as his 'contributions' seem to have stopped). Alternatively, abducted by aliens at the behest of Bill Gates. Same old, same old really.

No doubt some analysis of the 'Canada email' and the 'Great Reset' will be forthcoming shortly!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
5 In a Row said:
coldel said:
Roman Rhodes said:
Apparently this is the "lock me down harder thread" (from Covid cure...). No, I couldn't quite work that out either. Bit of looniness about the Rothschilds and George Soros (possibly one of the more anti-semitic posters has got a ban as his 'contributions' seem to have stopped). Alternatively, abducted by aliens at the behest of Bill Gates. Same old, same old really.

No doubt some analysis of the 'Canada email' and the 'Great Reset' will be forthcoming shortly!
Haha the lock me down harder thread, good one biglaugh yes damn us with our objective views and lack of emotive based ranting about 'them'

Oh yeah, because someone becomes wealthy of course their next step is to move into global domination and subjugation [insert evil laugh here] - maybe someone should mention that this isn't a Hollywood movie about kingsman and the like.
Well, looking at the Musk thread becoming wealthy DOES occasionally appear to lead to a desire for global domination and subjugation!
Musk certainly appears to be heading down that path but that's ok because clearly he's not one of 'them', he's on the side of the CTers!!



I've never heard of the Canada email, can someone enlighten me?
I have my tinfoil hat at the ready.
If you've donned your tinfoil:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/apr/29/...

It was very popular amongst the QAnon types on 'that' thread many volumes back. Perhaps one of them may be able to post up the full 'email'.

I was in Canada earlier this year and, weirdly, people seemed to own all sorts of stuff. Just like previous visits!

No doubt there's a legit reason why it hasn't happened 'yet'. hehe

Edit: Beaten to it above ^


Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 12th December 17:17

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Sunday 17th December 2023
quotequote all
OP here.

Nope, since writing this thread I'm absolutely convinced that CT's are in a league of their own when it comes gullible 'believe anything' stupidity.

They are usually to be found in their bedroom (still living at their parents house), underpants on their head whilst sipping an energy drink and reading some tripe on a far flung forum.

Bellends

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Wednesday 20th December 2023
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
MBBlat said:
Typical conspiracy thinking - 11,000 temporary exemption certificates were issued to medical staff, 85% due to recent COVID infection. Note the temporary, the same person could have multiple exemptions, so the number of actual people covered is much lower. Some anti-vax nutter heard the number, added 2+2 to get 11,000 and pulled out of their ass that they must have been elites.

Source for the 11,005 https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/13310460...
11,000 is 0.2% of NZ's population so there could easily be that many exemptions for legit medical reasons (I.E. people with a history of dangerous blood clots), which was my first thought.

It could even be 11,000 for acute trypanophobia. Not that you need an exemption from vaccination regardless of if you're terrified of needles.

That's the difference between a CTer and a normal person. A normal person won't jump immediately to an outlandish explanation whilst ignoring several logical ones.

The most hilarious thing I found is that there are "elites" in New Zealand.
But lots of sheep and/or sheeple?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 28th December 2023
quotequote all
PurplePenguin said:
swanny71 said:
Rufus Stone said:
coldel said:
Oh my good lord. 20 pages of ranting.
Unfortunately nowadays everyone thinks everyone is out to get them.
Having worked for companies that deal with large amounts of personal data, its interesting to see so many myths spoken as truths, and people just run with it because of ... yes you guessed it ... an underlying anxiety around authority.
It really is amazing how many times actual facts are ignored or disregarded and a conspiracy around authority is reached without a seconds breath.
Sad reality of the world today.
Is it the same people as those still posting in the covid thread?
Yup, quite a few of the Covid thread regulars, notably the “govern me harder daddy” idiot.
Not all that different to this thread really is it? With clodel being the “authority me harder daddy” character
I think the key difference is that the loony ramblings of the conspiracy theorists on that and the Covid thread are there for all to see, whereas the notion that anyone is expressing a desire to be “governed harder” is just a fantasy in the mind of the more unhinged posters. You appear to fall into that category unless you have examples of anyone saying “authority me harder” (or similar).

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 28th December 2023
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
It's basically this. Someone with authority and responsibility is being 'checked' and they don't like it - how dare you not trust me, don't you know who I am?
Well, no. That's what we're trying to figure out hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Thursday 28th December 2023
quotequote all
PurplePenguin said:
swanny71 said:
PurplePenguin said:
swanny71 said:
PurplePenguin said:
LF5335 said:
PurplePenguin said:
Not all that different to this thread really is it? With clodel being the “authority me harder daddy” character
I wanted to go for a drive today, but then it turns out that they want me to get insurance, VED, an MOT and have a driving licence, which requires me to send them a photo too. Then they set limits about how fast I can go before they fine me. They also expect me to stop at random lights, or when someone wants to cross the road at specific points. Why should I be subservient to another?

Absolutely ridiculous, it’s clear they’re just making rules up for their own benefit and they’ll use my photo to stitch me up for a crime.

They are all in on it.
Your post just reinforces the fact you are at the “appeal to authority” end of the scale and that you also missed the point.
@Penguin/Pangolin
Are you implying that if someone has a valid drivers license, car tax/insurance and obeys traffic lights etc. they suffer from authority bias?
rofl
No I’m not. And you also missed the point.
In which case, I’ve no idea what you are getting at when you write the above (my bold).

So what exactly is your point?

Explain it to me because maybe I’m just being a bit thick (pun intended given the title of this thread).
The general tone of this thread can be narrow minded because the usual suspects just repeat the same old self congratulatory narrative.
Many threads have a similar trend e.g. the covid thread. The DBS one was a little more interesting (to me) but if you have a viewpoint (which does lean towards appeal to authority imo) then obviously you will ridicule the sentiment behind it.
I think we all know the view each individual poster has and this probably won’t change.

Posters on this thread believing they are different to the posters on other threads but are in fact the same - it was really a subjective observation rather than a criticism.
Bold above. That is nonsense. As I've already said there are numerous posts on the DBS and Covid thread that are obviously factually incorrect and loony. You have provided zero evidence that anyone on this thread has an "appeal to authority" or "govern me harder" viewpoint. Those descriptions are just used as playground insults because you're incapable of seeing the world as anything other than binary.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Tuesday 2nd January 2024
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
Just heard a fun one that Finland doesn't exist. It's on the maps but the reality is it's a bit of ocean the Japanese (for some reason) are keeping for themselves. The clinching argument was 'Have you ever met anyone from Finland? You haven't. They were Swedish'.

The fun bit is it was basically this Reddit thread regurgitated, nearly 10 years on .. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2qjohv...

Edited by bigandclever on Monday 1st January 21:32
Lol, a UN driven conspiracy! Turbo must be a big fan

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

69 months

Tuesday 2nd January 2024
quotequote all
coldel said:
PurplePenguin said:
And yet, these types often do actually function in society - obviously, otherwise they would be in a secure mental facility.
Thats a fair point, they do actually function - which beggars the question how someone could believe something so utterly ridiculous and obviously incorrect yet hold down a job, look after their own finances, have meaningful relationships etc. But that is kind of the crux of this thread, how someone who for the most part just gets on with life but then is almost on a religious level throwing themselves into a belief system. Thats the psychology that so many people have studied and tried to understand, and what I like to refer to on here.
Don’t fall into the classic CT binary trap! There is clearly an area between functioning in society (normally) and being in a “secure mental facility”. People aren’t routinely locked up just because they have dysfunctional lives.

They are locked up because they go against the elites and MSM narrative (government propaganda). Obviously. smile