Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?
Discussion
paulguitar said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
V6 Pushfit said:
53 cases were thrown out. You’re wrong chap. The desire to get in with the biggest most bizarre conspiracy this century has got you a bit muddled maybe?
Who bought these 53 cases?They were not Trumps legal team.
You are wrong.
Or give me facts
Should make it easier for you.
but it wasnt you that made the ridiculous claim
You can answer if it you like?
I dare you.
Shuvi McTupya said:
paulguitar said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
V6 Pushfit said:
53 cases were thrown out. You’re wrong chap. The desire to get in with the biggest most bizarre conspiracy this century has got you a bit muddled maybe?
Who bought these 53 cases?They were not Trumps legal team.
You are wrong.
Or give me facts
Should make it easier for you.
but it wasnt you that made the ridiculous claim
You can answer if it you like?
I dare you.
Monkeylegend said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
paulguitar said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
V6 Pushfit said:
53 cases were thrown out. You’re wrong chap. The desire to get in with the biggest most bizarre conspiracy this century has got you a bit muddled maybe?
Who bought these 53 cases?They were not Trumps legal team.
You are wrong.
Or give me facts
Should make it easier for you.
but it wasnt you that made the ridiculous claim
You can answer if it you like?
I dare you.
it wasnt me that made the claim that 53 court cases were thrown out, I was asking for evidence of that claim.
I have nothing to prove (in this instance)
(added) dont make a claim unless you can back it up..
Here’s one SM:
https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
V6 Pushfit said:
Here’s one SM:
https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
Forget that.https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
Shuvi McTupya said:
Forget that.
Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
This is Freeman on the land wibble.Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
There is no evidence.
Shuvi McTupya said:
V6 Pushfit said:
Here’s one SM:
https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
Forget that.https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923...
First one that came up, but there are of course 180,000,000 other reports all similar.
Why am I bothering with this????
Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
I admit it. The BBC just confirmed:
It was 62 cases thrown out not 53
And as he BBC have just said - the Trump party of ‘Law & Order’ has chosen to ignore the rulings of each and every one of those cases.
SCOTUS are the ONLY court not to hear any evidence, as they didn’t want to make decisions that were out of their remit and already decided by State courts.
Shuvi McTupya said:
Hold on a second here....
it wasnt me that made the claim that 53 court cases were thrown out, I was asking for evidence of that claim.
I have nothing to prove (in this instance)
(added) dont make a claim unless you can back it up..
Typical response of somebody who is making things up that they want to hear it wasnt me that made the claim that 53 court cases were thrown out, I was asking for evidence of that claim.
I have nothing to prove (in this instance)
(added) dont make a claim unless you can back it up..
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
I believe you claimed that the courts would not hear the evidence.
So don't try and duck the issue, what evidence are you aware of that they should they have heard?
Bill said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
Forget that.
Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
This is Freeman on the land wibble.Give me ONE case that the Trump legal team bought to the court that was thrown out.
just one.
(clue, for court case to be thrown out, the evidence has to be heard)
I know i am probably not going to convince you of anything, but that is the way the court system historically and legally works..
There is no evidence.
Asking for proof of a ridiculous claim is something to do with freeman on the land?
Can you explain that ?
You are clutching at straws..
Monkeylegend said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
Hold on a second here....
it wasnt me that made the claim that 53 court cases were thrown out, I was asking for evidence of that claim.
I have nothing to prove (in this instance)
(added) dont make a claim unless you can back it up..
Typical response of somebody who is making things up that they want to hear it wasnt me that made the claim that 53 court cases were thrown out, I was asking for evidence of that claim.
I have nothing to prove (in this instance)
(added) dont make a claim unless you can back it up..
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
I believe you claimed that the courts would not hear the evidence.
So don't try and duck the issue, what evidence are you aware of that they should they have heard?
I can take this offline with you if you like?
I cant discuss it on PH, I will get banned.
V6 Pushfit said:
I was wrong.
I admit it. The BBC just confirmed:
It was 62 cases thrown out not 53
And as he BBC have just said - the Trump party of ‘Law & Order’ has chosen to ignore the rulings of each and every one of those cases.
SCOTUS are the ONLY court not to hear any evidence, as they didn’t want to make decisions that were out of their remit and already decided by State courts.
if you are relying on the BBC for your news there is no much hope for you.I admit it. The BBC just confirmed:
It was 62 cases thrown out not 53
And as he BBC have just said - the Trump party of ‘Law & Order’ has chosen to ignore the rulings of each and every one of those cases.
SCOTUS are the ONLY court not to hear any evidence, as they didn’t want to make decisions that were out of their remit and already decided by State courts.
Trumps Legal team had 4/5 legal cases.
Please prove me wrong.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff