Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?

Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?

Author
Discussion

Rollin

6,154 posts

251 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
Shuvi McTupya said:
Rollin said:
Shuvi McTupya said:
Rollin said:
Exactly this.

The nutters aren't people who she may have been trying to convince that the vaccine is safe. They are the ones demanding proof of life, saturating her social media with weirdo bullst and suggestig she has a body double.
asking if someone is ok is weirdo bullst?
Yes it is. Why would you ask?
Because some wierdo's care about other people, and other wierdo's are just wierdo's.

If I passed out on TV after having a new drug injected into me and then disappeared off the face of the earth I would hope that people would be curious and maybe check to see if everything was ok!
Well yes, of course YOU would expect that. That's one trait of the conspiracy theorist.

The only reason people would ask her is because they don't believe the current evidence.
Further up, you've stated that you will not be convinced until she satisfies YOUR specific evidence requests.
That's weird, and it's not at all out of concern for her welfare so don't kid yourself.


Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

253 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
Rollin said:
Well yes, of course YOU would expect that. That's one trait of the conspiracy theorist.

The only reason people would ask her is because they don't believe the current evidence.
Further up, you've stated that you will not be convinced until she satisfies YOUR specific evidence requests.
That's weird, and it's not at all out of concern for her welfare so don't kid yourself.
You are right, I am not concerned about her, people die every day of all sorts of things and I do not mourn them either. I never said was concerned, You have invented that.

I just can't see the logic in hiding her away and creating this conspiracy. You probably don't realise just how many people are talking about this..it is turning into a big thing.





Sophisticated Sarah

15,078 posts

175 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
Shuvi McTupya said:
paulguitar said:
Well, what more evidence do we need?
Maybe she is just doing it to increase her followers on the gram..It is working smile

She has 37000 followers..

8000 people have asked if she is Ok on just the first picture on her account.

If she is Ok and just wanted to stay out of the lime light, this is plainly not working.

You know what, i am going to get off the fence and say that I think she is VERY ill, or dead.

And I will donate £100 to the charity of anyone's choice if that is PROVED to be wrong. (that will take more than a news source just telling us she is ok without proving it)



Edited by Shuvi McTupya on Saturday 26th December 17:16
If she’s ok and wanted to avoid publicity she could easily have changed her Instagram profile to private.

Hopefully she’s ok! Probably something simple like not living her life on social media, broken phone, out of data etc

SS2.

14,514 posts

244 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
Sophisticated Sarah said:
If she’s ok and wanted to avoid publicity she could easily have changed her Instagram profile to private.

Hopefully she’s ok! Probably something simple like not living her life on social media, broken phone, out of data etc
Quite.

She agreed to be the subject of a publicity push for the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, so she's clearly not camera shy..

Rumours and claims of her demise are spreading globally and, with more and more questions being censored / met with silence and the vaccination program taking a bit of a kicking as a result, it can only be a matter of time before the authorities get Nurse Tiffany to give a short, maskless interview to show the world she's fine and dandy. Put the matter to bed and leave the conspiracy loving looms all feeling a little foolish.

Frankly, I'm astonished this hasn't been done by now. But hey, she's entitled to a little down time during the holidays, same as the rest of us.

There will also be a perfectly reasonable explanation for the deletion / going dark of all her social media accounts, likewise the [now deleted] claims from relatives that she was on holiday with them on the same day the CHI Memorial claimed she had completed a full shift.

Very easy to get things so muddled during this crazy time of year, and sure to put right in the next day or so.

Nothing to see here, move along please.


Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

73 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
I think google warping search engine results can't be overstated in how people are being led to extremes. I mean I just searched nurse tiffany just see to what its all about (don't follow mainstream news regularly) and I got a whole page of links aggressively debunking the death claim.

Now obviously the jab is unlikely to have killed her that's just not how it works at all but I come away finding something dark and ominous.... it will be polarizing people rather than the foolish and patronising way Google think they're educating/correcting people

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
CzechItOut said:
V6 Pushfit said:
No opinion either way as I’m not particularly interested, he was an irrelevant sideshow. However OH has sat next to PA more than once snd thinks he’s a pompous ignoramus so it would have been interesting if he was properly subpoenaed.
In what way do you think Epstein was an irrelevant sideshow?
In the way that he was a sideshow and not relevant.

CzechItOut

2,154 posts

197 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
V6 Pushfit said:
In the way that he was a sideshow and not relevant.
How is he a slideshow and not relevant?

There is a belief that powerful elites are engaging in large scale child abuse and Epstein was connected to everyone from Donald Trump to Prince Andrew as well as having a conviction for "procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute".

Many feel that far from irrelevant, Epstein was the smoking gun and his arrest for sex trafficking of minors and subsequent court case would blow the whole thing open. Then he "kills himself". However, despite being on suicide watch and considered high risk there was no witnesses or CCTV of the event.

That is pretty much the dictionary definition of relevant in my book.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
CzechItOut said:
V6 Pushfit said:
In the way that he was a sideshow and not relevant.
How is he a slideshow and not relevant?

There is a belief that powerful elites are engaging in large scale child abuse and Epstein was connected to everyone from Donald Trump to Prince Andrew as well as having a conviction for "procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute".

Many feel that far from irrelevant, Epstein was the smoking gun and his arrest for sex trafficking of minors and subsequent court case would blow the whole thing open. Then he "kills himself". However, despite being on suicide watch and considered high risk there was no witnesses or CCTV of the event.

That is pretty much the dictionary definition of relevant in my book.
I’m about as interested in that as I am in Katie Prices broken foot/nose job/teeth or whatever crisis she’s currently in.

Too tabloid for me - there are much bigger things of interest in the US at the moment.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

73 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
To those with the most criticism of conspiracy theorists - What's an acceptable amount of belief?

I mean we live in a world of secret spy planes, savile and cyril smith, DDT and africanised honey bees just to chuck a few out there, so why people might claim secrets, cover ups or question experimental treatments and technologies doesn't seem so utterly mad as some are determined to convice you.

I'm not "on board" with the conspiracists, I'm just wondering why its all so binary... Take for example the new MRNA vaccine technology that's heralded as being safe and if you don't believe then that's because you're a nutter. But the truth is we just don't know what risks it may present - there are no known risks which is something quite different. I'm not anti-the-vaccine - its an exciting new technology that could bring some great benefits in multiple arenas, and at some level you just have to go with the flow because that's how society works. But where does a skeptic stand in this weird binary world?

bodhi

11,324 posts

235 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
The thing is tho, just because some conspiracy theories are complete and utter arse juice doesn't mean they all are. I mean to me it's quite obvious the world is round, we went to the moon, Covid is an actually disease and 9/11 wasn't an inside job.

On the other hand, Epstein clearly didn't kill himself, it looks very unlikely that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK alone, and I suspect we will never hear the true story behind the Las Vegas gunman from a couple of years ago. In the spirit of the thread title, I'd suggest you're a bit thick if you believe any of the official stories in those cases.

paulguitar

25,734 posts

119 months

Sunday 27th December 2020
quotequote all
Teddy Lop said:
But where does a skeptic stand in this weird binary world?
Skeptical about some things, clear on others, based on available evidence.

Concerns/questions regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, reasonable.

Thinking we didn't go to the moon, nutters.



RDMcG

19,450 posts

213 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all

Esceptico

8,082 posts

115 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
RDMcG said:
A pity we can’t like posts on here!

DBSV8

5,958 posts

244 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
the flat earth society


https://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erA3WQE9Zes&t=...

what a bunch of fruit loops .....whatever they are on i want some

CzechItOut

2,154 posts

197 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
Skeptical about some things, clear on others, based on available evidence.

Concerns/questions regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, reasonable.

Thinking we didn't go to the moon, nutters.
This is my conspiracy theory, theory. There is obviously shady stuff going on. For example, the authorities have been covering up child sexual abuse by the rich and powerful for years, Saville, Cyril Smith and Clement Freud in Britain, Epstein, Clinton, Trump and Prince Andrew in the US and so on. Therefore, this conspiracy theory, which has been doing the rounds for years, is only just now starting to gradually unravel.

However, other conspiracies, such as the moon landings, Reptilians, flat Earth etc. are create deliberately by The Powers That Be to distract attention and act as a smoke screen for the real shady stuff.

In turn, the likes of Alex Jones and David Icke are in fact shills for The Powers That Be and their job is to propagate all these false conspiracies. Occasionally they hit upon something correct, but as they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Coupled with the likes of Jones and Icke are the people that simply dismiss every conspiracy as nonsense. I find it bizarre that anyone can dismiss all conspiracies out of hand when there is so much evidence of many conspiracies being true.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
the flat earth society


https://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erA3WQE9Zes&t=...

what a bunch of fruit loops .....whatever they are on i want some
I think they’re mainly students and eccentrics trolling tbh and just enjoy winding people up.

I expect some think the earth is flat but most are just taking the piss.

I think it’s a fake conspiracy theory to take the piss out of conspiracy theorists or people that get upset about conspiracy theorists or just both.

Randy Winkman

17,250 posts

195 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
Esceptico said:
RDMcG said:
A pity we can’t like posts on here!
smile It's the "Do your own research" one that always gets me. Especially on massive topics like CV19 or climate change. Like I'm going to suddenly become an expert on them.

Sophisticated Sarah

15,078 posts

175 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:
I think they’re mainly students and eccentrics trolling tbh and just enjoy winding people up.

I expect some think the earth is flat but most are just taking the piss.

I think it’s a fake conspiracy theory to take the piss out of conspiracy theorists or people that get upset about conspiracy theorists or just both.
yes

I’ve mentioned before that I know a chap who trolls Facebook groups to laugh at those proving their intelligence by debunking his claims. He’s a commercial pilot hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
the flat earth society


https://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erA3WQE9Zes&t=...

what a bunch of fruit loops .....whatever they are on i want some
It used to be the thing to join for a laugh (Probably still is) and good for kudos !!!

A bit like joining the Fairthorpe Owners Club is now (smallest car club) - which I have

droopsnoot

12,498 posts

248 months

Monday 28th December 2020
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Esceptico said:
RDMcG said:
A pity we can’t like posts on here!
smile It's the "Do your own research" one that always gets me. Especially on massive topics like CV19 or climate change. Like I'm going to suddenly become an expert on them.
It's very good, but it's missing "Wake up sheeple!". One of those words that immediately negates whatever that person was trying to say, IMO.