What are your unpopular opinions? (Vol. 2)
Discussion
whoami said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
Perhaps not a particularly unpopular opinion. My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
deckster said:
whoami said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
Perhaps not a particularly unpopular opinion. My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
deckster said:
You don't need to like her, but the real question is do you think she is saying something important that needs to be listened to?
My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
I dislike her AND I dislike what she is saying. Even if you accept the IPCC's most pessimistic projections, Greta's warnings are way over the top.My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
ging84 said:
Allan L said:
A fer 'orses
B fer mutton
C fer yourself
D fer ential
E fer Bartok
F fer vescence
etc?
Don't get that oneB fer mutton
C fer yourself
D fer ential
E fer Bartok
F fer vescence
etc?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartok
deckster said:
whoami said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
Perhaps not a particularly unpopular opinion. My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
My unpopular opinion is I couldn't care less about GW, co2, or any of that crap, bores the hell out of me.
Harry H said:
ging84 said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
She is autistic and a childWacky Racer said:
Harry H said:
ging84 said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
She is autistic and a childThe planet is experiencing climate change, but it's population driving it, not what the population is doing.
We allow uncontrolled reproduction. Why?
Greta will expect to have children which is only going to place a greater demand on the world's finite resources. Sterilising her will help prevent passing on her "autistic" gene.
Wars? We need more of them. Bigger and more violent than before.
Coronavirus from China? Let it run it's course.
It would be strangely sweet if Greta was a victim.
Harry H said:
ging84 said:
cypriot said:
I don't like Greta Thunberg. I find her extremely hostile and naive. I also hate all the pandering done to her.
She is autistic and a childdavhill said:
Unpopular opinion?
There are many things, including...
Greta Thunderbug
The guvverment
Stricly cum dancing
Selebz
Vastly filled lips on women
Big Bruvva
Global toasting
Cyclists
Beetle-browed women
PC
Boxsets
Football
...in which I couldn't be less interested if you paid me.
So there.
The title of the thread was unpopular opinions. You have just outed yourself as a mainstream PHer with those views.There are many things, including...
Greta Thunderbug
The guvverment
Stricly cum dancing
Selebz
Vastly filled lips on women
Big Bruvva
Global toasting
Cyclists
Beetle-browed women
PC
Boxsets
Football
...in which I couldn't be less interested if you paid me.
So there.
Some one mentioned population increase. I'm always banging on about this yet its seldom mentioned elsewhere.
If the world population was a overweight person...and getting bigger,would we look for ways of affording more food,getting bigger cloths or even buying stronger furniture etc? No,we would say how about stopping the growth and maybe even reducing the size.
So why not a discussion on over population?
If the world population was a overweight person...and getting bigger,would we look for ways of affording more food,getting bigger cloths or even buying stronger furniture etc? No,we would say how about stopping the growth and maybe even reducing the size.
So why not a discussion on over population?
Gavin_Essex said:
The benefits system (for job seekers) should be overhauled. A seeker gets the full weekly amount - whatever that may be - upon receipt of x number of hours community service. With a sliding scale (in £ received) downwards based upon the number of hours dedicated to said community service.
Fag packet maths = jobseekers receive the full amount in return for approx 3 days / 21 hours local litter picking, graffiti washing, chewing gum removal tasks, etc. - the rest of the time making up a 'full time' week can be dedicated to standard JS tasks, job applications, etc. You only show up for 50% of the time? You get half the handout.
I've worked across central London councils briefly, and the belief held by some of the poorest people, who are conditioned to believe they are fully entitled to live in prime central London areas (Westminster, Kensington&Chelsea) with fully paid-up housing completely baffles me. The majority of 'white collar' workers cannot afford to live here, so why should people on state hand-outs live in such desirable locations?
In addition, and this is something I feel strongly about, the Foo Fighters are proper s
t ... I don't get the appeal at all
My unpopular opinion is that people with opinions like this should have to live under those conditions themselves for a year. Treating people like criminals because they're involuntarily out of work is not acceptable. It would surely be more useful to help them back to work rather than punish people when they're out of work. There's also no reason to deliberately and callously create enclaves for the wealthy. No reason at all there shouldn't be social housing in every area. Some of my ancestors were extremely poor but came from places like Pimlico and Chelsea. Cleansing people from their native areas for the benefit of incomers would be despicable.Fag packet maths = jobseekers receive the full amount in return for approx 3 days / 21 hours local litter picking, graffiti washing, chewing gum removal tasks, etc. - the rest of the time making up a 'full time' week can be dedicated to standard JS tasks, job applications, etc. You only show up for 50% of the time? You get half the handout.
I've worked across central London councils briefly, and the belief held by some of the poorest people, who are conditioned to believe they are fully entitled to live in prime central London areas (Westminster, Kensington&Chelsea) with fully paid-up housing completely baffles me. The majority of 'white collar' workers cannot afford to live here, so why should people on state hand-outs live in such desirable locations?
In addition, and this is something I feel strongly about, the Foo Fighters are proper s
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
But you're right about the Foo Fighters. Boring.
Edited by ElectricSoup on Friday 24th January 09:16
Dr Jekyll said:
deckster said:
You don't need to like her, but the real question is do you think she is saying something important that needs to be listened to?
My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
I dislike her AND I dislike what she is saying. Even if you accept the IPCC's most pessimistic projections, Greta's warnings are way over the top.My (unpopular?) observation is that people that claim to dislike her actually dislike what she is saying.
I don't recall her being voted spokesperson for the planet.
SCEtoAUX said:
ElectricSoup said:
But your'e right about the Foo Fighters. Boring.
One for all of the West Wing fans. It's "Foo Fighters", not "the Foo Fighters" (In the same way that people say "Dire Straits, not "the Dire Straights".Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff