dog licences would you get one

Author
Discussion

eskidavies73

Original Poster:

5,671 posts

174 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
if the goverment brought dog licences back into action would you bye one for your dog or ignore it and face a fine or the possibilty of your dog being taken away

bexVN

14,690 posts

226 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
I would get one but then wouldn't all responsible owners, which probably defeats the object of them!

I remember as a kid using mt pocket money to buy my first dog Megs license 37.5p. I was really upset when they stopped it, I was proud of that responsibility smile

Jasandjules

71,032 posts

244 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
No, I'd get three.

No way would I risk losing my dogs.

Mrs Grumpy

863 posts

204 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
This is a much debated argument, along with compulsory microchipping and insurance.

As with the likes of car ownership, those of us that are responsible will comply with the law. Those who couldn't give a stuff will continue to not give a stuff.

IMHO simply not worth re-introducing.

SPR2

3,207 posts

211 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
bexVN said:
I would get one but then wouldn't all responsible owners, which probably defeats the object of them!

I remember as a kid using mt pocket money to buy my first dog Megs license 37.5p. I was really upset when they stopped it, I was proud of that responsibility smile
Did you keep it?

I think it would have similar results if micro chipping was enforced as a recognition of dog ownership.

eskidavies73

Original Poster:

5,671 posts

174 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
SPR2 said:
bexVN said:
I would get one but then wouldn't all responsible owners, which probably defeats the object of them!

I remember as a kid using mt pocket money to buy my first dog Megs license 37.5p. I was really upset when they stopped it, I was proud of that responsibility smile
Did you keep it?

I think it would have similar results if micro chipping was enforced as a recognition of dog ownership.
my dog is chipped and insured also quite happy to buy a licence.if you drive a car no license you break law same should be for dog ownership no license,have penalties

bexVN

14,690 posts

226 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
SPR2 said:
bexVN said:
I would get one but then wouldn't all responsible owners, which probably defeats the object of them!

I remember as a kid using mt pocket money to buy my first dog Megs license 37.5p. I was really upset when they stopped it, I was proud of that responsibility smile
Did you keep it?

I think it would have similar results if micro chipping was enforced as a recognition of dog ownership.
It's quite possible. I have an envelope with some of her paperwork and there's a good chance it is still in there. I'll have to have a look now smile

Moo27

395 posts

188 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I would definitely 110% Get a licence! I do think there need to be some sort of governing rules to owning a pooch.

DavesFlaps

683 posts

206 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
The problem is, decent law abiding people wouldn't have an issue with buying a dog license. The scumbag mouth breathers who can't control their dogs wouldn't give a st.

Jasandjules

71,032 posts

244 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
DavesFlaps said:
The problem is, decent law abiding people wouldn't have an issue with buying a dog license. The scumbag mouth breathers who can't control their dogs wouldn't give a st.
Indeed. And it would be the poor dogs who would suffer too.

RB Will

10,300 posts

255 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I would buy one. Knowing the government it would be £200 or based on dog size/ emissions. Would it last the lifetime of the dog or have to be renewed every year like car tax?

Marky Boy

164 posts

247 months

Saturday 22nd January 2011
quotequote all
Abso bloody lutely. In my opinion if you have a dog it should be granted the same protection as a child. It is after all entirely dependant on the owner.

I know this is a contentious issue, but be honest here. A dog should be a privilege and not a right. They should be compulsorily chipped and insured. If government legislation with teeth would introduce this I would welcome it.

I only bought my dog on the wishes of my ex who pretty much bullied me into it. I could not believe that I could just meet some random bloke and purchase an animal that in the wrong hand could be quite dangerous.

I did however buy the dog after lots of reading on the costs and various responsibilities. The dog now lives with me and I consider him as part of my family. There is not a penny I wouldn't spend on his wellbeing. It takes a bit of financial commitment when I consider it costs more to insure him than the Porsche.
I just don't understand how some scumbag living in a flat can go and buy a dog with no long term consideration to the dogs life. Seriously, if you cannot afford to insure a dog you shouldn't be allowed to have one. And if having licences goes someway to ensuring insurance and that only suitable people purchase dogs then I'm all for it.


Edited by Marky Boy on Saturday 22 January 17:00

Mighty Flex

917 posts

186 months

Saturday 22nd January 2011
quotequote all
be careful, maybe it will end up based on the same emissions rules as cars and will be £1000s a year. biggrin
think of the polar bears!

Marky Boy

164 posts

247 months

Saturday 22nd January 2011
quotequote all
That is why I said legislation with teeth. If you were to be heavily fined and punished for not registering/chipping/insuring your dog then it may work. To be honest anything that restricts dog ownership to responsible owners is never going to be a bad thing and I would gladly pay for it.