Another light aeroplane crash, on a train track

Another light aeroplane crash, on a train track

Author
Discussion

Ron Burgundy

Original Poster:

3,296 posts

201 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all

Scuffers

20,887 posts

289 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
very sad...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Can't imagine how that happened, unless he was asleep or the engine failed...

Eric Mc

123,934 posts

280 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Can't imagine how that happened, unless he was asleep or the engine failed...
No point in idle speculation at this stage. Plane's crash for a myriad of reasons over and above the two you've mentioned.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
mybrainhurts said:
Can't imagine how that happened, unless he was asleep or the engine failed...
No point in idle speculation at this stage. Plane's crash for a myriad of reasons over and above the two you've mentioned.
Yes, I know that. Just puzzled as to how one flies a microlite into, or anywhere near, power lines over a railway...

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
How do you know it's a microlight?

Speculation is utterly meaningless, especially as no-one knows anything. I can think of various reasons why an aircraft could end up in powerlines. I wouldn't however post them on a public website.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
IforB said:
How do you know it's a microlight?
Several radio news reports today

IforB said:
Speculation is utterly meaningless, especially as no-one knows anything. I can think of various reasons why an aircraft could end up in powerlines. I wouldn't however post them on a public website.
What a hero you are. I was looking for answers, not giving them.


IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
No-one can give you answers. Nobody knows. Uniformed speculation and the standard of journalism when it comes to aircraft accidents means I'll treat them with great suspicion unitl it is confirmed by the police or in the AAIB report. Most journo's haven't got the foggiest what the difference between a microlight or light aircraft is, so invariably the reporting is often utter tosh.

I've had a fair few friends killed in aircraft crashes over the years and invariably any speculation is unwelcome and total bo**ocks, especially when it is from people with all the aviation knowledge of your average pebble.

Edited by IforB on Friday 2nd January 19:26

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Perhaps you'll return to tell us when you see the AAIB report?

We never seem to get to that stage...I still haven't heard what happened to Colin MacRae

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
I know a bit about that crash, but I won't post it publicly. All you can say is that it was a horrid crash aftermath and very difficult to find out the information as to exactly what happened.

When the AAIB have done that, then they'll release the report. Until then, it helps no-one to speculate as to what happened, especially this close to an accident where 2 people seem to have lost their lives.

It's just poor taste in my eyes.

All AAIB reports are available to everyone. They aren't hidden away. http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/home/index.cfm

Edited by IforB on Friday 2nd January 19:45

peterguk V6 KWK

2,615 posts

232 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
IforB said:
How do you know it's a microlight?
Several radio news reports today
"The aircraft, believed to be a Piper Cherokee"

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/latest-national-news/F...

Driller

8,310 posts

293 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
IforB said:
No-one can give you answers. Nobody knows. Uniformed speculation and the standard of journalism when it comes to aircraft accidents means I'll treat them with great suspicion unitl it is confirmed by the police or in the AAIB report. Most journo's haven't got the foggiest what the difference between a microlight or light aircraft is, so invariably the reporting is often utter tosh.

I've had a fair few friends killed in aircraft crashes over the years and invariably any speculation is unwelcome and total bo**ocks, especially when it is from people with all the aviation knowledge of your average pebble.

Edited by IforB on Friday 2nd January 19:26
I never understood why everyone goes "it's too early to speculate" "you musn't speculate". This is a discussion forum why is there this silent rule banning anyone from discussing reasons for a plane crash like it's illegal or something and the folk must be scolded and put in their place?

Just wondering smile

Edited by Driller on Friday 2nd January 19:47

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Which is certainly not a microlight. It proves my point about uninformed speculation and people who don't know what they are talking about.

just me

5,964 posts

235 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
I think it was a tandem bike jump gone wrong. Bet they were drunk, too.

Ooh, did I just violate someone's anti-speculation rules?

Edited by just me on Friday 2nd January 19:51

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
IforB said:
I know a bit about that crash, but I won't post it publicly. All you can say is that it was a horrid crash aftermath and very difficult to find out the information as to exactly what happened.

When the AAIB have done that, then they'll release the report. Until then, it helps no-one to speculate as to what happened, especially this close to an accident where 2 people seem to have lost their lives.

It's just poor taste in my eyes.
I'm always amazed by the way you aviation bods consider the subject taboo.

In your position, I would be keen to discuss possible causes in case it revealed something of which I was unaware, thereby enhancing my personal safety. Parallel scenarios on the roads have opened my eyes a few times.

IforB said:
All AAIB reports are available to everyone. They aren't hidden away. http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/home/index.cfm
Thanks, I didn't know that.






Edited by mybrainhurts on Friday 2nd January 19:55

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Driller said:
IforB said:
No-one can give you answers. Nobody knows. Uniformed speculation and the standard of journalism when it comes to aircraft accidents means I'll treat them with great suspicion unitl it is confirmed by the police or in the AAIB report. Most journo's haven't got the foggiest what the difference between a microlight or light aircraft is, so invariably the reporting is often utter tosh.

I've had a fair few friends killed in aircraft crashes over the years and invariably any speculation is unwelcome and total bo**ocks, especially when it is from people with all the aviation knowledge of your average pebble.

Edited by IforB on Friday 2nd January 19:26
I never understood why everyone goes "it's too early to speculate" "you musn't speculate". This is a discussion forum why is there this silent rule banning anyone discussing reasons for a plane crash like it's illegal something and the folk are being put in their place.

Just wondering smile
No, it's because the causes of accidents are often extremely complex and people blathering on about a subject they know stuff all about when people aren't even cold yet is just bad taste. The aviation world is an extremely small one and uniformed speculation is often extremely upsetting for friends and relatives. So the convention is not to speculate as it does more harm than good.

There are accidents where you can be fairly certain of what happened almost immediately, for example the Steve Hislop crash. That sort of accident happens with alarming regularity and is something that all Robinson pilots (and all of those flying helicopters with similar rotor systems) are made aware of.

In flying we deal with fact not speculation or guess work. Hearing people blathering on with no understanding of flying let alone all the facts of a particular accident is infuriating for those of us who fly professionally and who are often associated with the deceased in someway. We have stuff to learn from accidents, but only when the results and reasons are known.

Until then, it's just mawkish gawking.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
peterguk V6 KWK said:
mybrainhurts said:
IforB said:
How do you know it's a microlight?
Several radio news reports today
"The aircraft, believed to be a Piper Cherokee"

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/latest-national-news/F...
I would be surprised if that's right.

Look at the BBC video in the opening post. Not much wreckage.

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
I've seen wreckage from one friend's aircraft that could have been put into a shoebox. The aircraft was far bigger than a PA28.

That means nothing. From the small bit of fibreglass in a photo, then I could easily say that it might be a PA28 as reported there. Not that I'm saying it is.

Edited to add: I've just been in contact with someone involved with all of this and it is a PA28. I won't post the registration though.

Edited by IforB on Friday 2nd January 20:09

B17NNS

18,506 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
IforB said:
All AAIB reports are available to everyone. They aren't hidden away. http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/home/index.cfm
Not ALL of them obviously. Only the ones they want us to know about.

There isn't a single mention of any alien craft crashing in there and Roswell doesn't get a mention either.

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

209 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Heard about this just after it happened, first heard about it as 'Plane crashes near railway line in Staffordshire.' As i live about 100 metres from a train track myself some very frantic calls followed. Happened about 5 minutes away from me, a tragedy.