heating your house with cold theory
heating your house with cold theory
Author
Discussion

isee

Original Poster:

3,713 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
This is just theorising so bear with me:

I asked earlier about heating a portacabin with renewable energy, and the suggestions were:
solar cells
solar heating
underground heating

all rely on heat radiation to work of course.

It got me thinking if there is any way we could extract energy from the cold instead and at first discounted it unless we find some freely available material that is solid in heat and evaporates in the cold (a reverse steam engine type thing).

Anyway, water expands when it freezes right?
so what if we were to get a cylinder, fill it with water and put a piston on top, the piston drives some heavy duty hydraulic generator. (i sway heavy duty since the freezing process is painfully slow so we would need to rely on the awesome power of freezing rather than the freeze/defrost cycle frequency) (so we'd be extracting torque, rather than bhp in engine comparison?)

so this liquid expands, activates these massively stiff turbines, they produce electricity and heat your home. shut the insulating flap and the liquid defrosts, driving the generators again.

could that possibly work in a much refined form or is the concept so deeply flawed that I should get my coat?

syncro.

186 posts

200 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
You'll be needing this -> getmecoat and a copy of Thermodynamics for dummies (try Amazon)

isee

Original Poster:

3,713 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
syncro. said:
You'll be needing this -> getmecoat and a copy of Thermodynamics for dummies (try Amazon)
In my defence, it all just came to me within 10 seconds, then i had another 45 to think about whilst i was typing.

Though, why wouldn't it work in short? I am not exatly extraccting energy from nothing, the colds is coming from somwhere too and I am just playing with the temperature differential.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

210 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
cold isn't a thing, cold is just not as hot as not cold.


Magog

2,653 posts

211 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Stirling engines work on temperature differentials. Presumably you could rig one up to take advantage of the warmer temperature underground vs the colder temperature of the surfaceenvironment. And make it work in the opposite circumstances when the envionment was warmer than the temperature of the ground.

marshalla

15,902 posts

223 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
What you describe is very similar to how some steam engines work. The motive force comes from steam in one direction and atmospheric pressure in the other, when the steam on the other side of the piston cools and condenses.

http://www.mgsteam.btinternet.co.uk/engdev.htm

Edited by marshalla on Tuesday 5th January 17:14

Mr.Jimbo

2,084 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Our new house uses some sort of magic mumbo jumbo to take heat out of the air, kind of like a reverse air conditioner (exactly like it in fact)

All I know is, the two units round the back of the garageblow out BLOODY cold air, and despite Dad explaining it to me a few times, I can't see the benefit of a system that takes heat out of the air in winter, as you'd get more heat in summer, and less in winter!

I may have started something though, he came back from the library yesterday with a couple of thermodynamic books...

voyds9

8,490 posts

305 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Magog said:
Stirling engines work on temperature differentials. Presumably you could rig one up to take advantage of the warmer temperature underground vs the colder temperature of the surfaceenvironment. And make it work in the opposite circumstances when the envionment was warmer than the temperature of the ground.
Isn't that a geothermal heat pump

Magog

2,653 posts

211 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
voyds9 said:
Magog said:
Stirling engines work on temperature differentials. Presumably you could rig one up to take advantage of the warmer temperature underground vs the colder temperature of the surfaceenvironment. And make it work in the opposite circumstances when the envionment was warmer than the temperature of the ground.
Isn't that a geothermal heat pump
Not exactly I dont think. geothermal heat pump uses energy(external) to efficiently heat or cool a space, using the earth as a heat source or sink. What i was talking about would use the temperature differential to generate energy (which could then be used to heat a space). It probably wouldn't work though.

Simpo Two

90,907 posts

287 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
I prefer my idea:

You get a really big blue snooker ball, fire it into space, then accelerate it back towards you really fast so the blue colour turns into microwaves. You absorb the microwaves with a big dish and use them to power something, then decelerate the ball and repeat the cycle.

A 'double-expansion' version of this invention is to keep the ball moving past you at high speed such that the blue colour turns into infra-red; again you collect the radiation but this time as it recedes. This way, for every stopping and reacceleration of the ball, you get two helpings of energy.

All I need is a way to power the ball. Perhaps some of the energy gathered could be re-transmitted back to it. Or maybe keep some of it back to start with, thereby avoiding transmission losses.

Trevelyan

729 posts

211 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Mr.Jimbo said:
Our new house uses some sort of magic mumbo jumbo to take heat out of the air, kind of like a reverse air conditioner (exactly like it in fact)

All I know is, the two units round the back of the garageblow out BLOODY cold air, and despite Dad explaining it to me a few times, I can't see the benefit of a system that takes heat out of the air in winter, as you'd get more heat in summer, and less in winter!
I think you mean an air source heat pump.

http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/Generate-your-...

In summary:

clicky linky said:
An air source heat pump extracts heat from the outside air in the same way that a fridge extracts heat from its inside. It can extract heat from the air even when the outside temperature is as low as minus 15° C.

syncro.

186 posts

200 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
isee said:
syncro. said:
You'll be needing this -> getmecoat and a copy of Thermodynamics for dummies (try Amazon)
In my defence, it all just came to me within 10 seconds, then i had another 45 to think about whilst i was typing.

Though, why wouldn't it work in short? I am not exactly extracting energy from nothing, the colds is coming from somewhere too and I am just playing with the temperature differential.
Where does the heat come from to melt the ice? If its the room your heating then all you'll succeed in doing is heating the room up, then cooling the room down when you close the flap. Only you won't heat the room up as much as you cool it each time so the average temperature will in fact drop because you're machine won't be 100% efficient and won't be able to turn 100% of the work the ice does on it into energy to heat the room.

I'd be tempted to say the efficiency of a machine that turns 10mm of movement from the expansion of ice into a few thousand revolutions of a generator will be extremely low, 10s of percent probably.

There's also the issue of where you're getting your heat from.

Simpo Two

90,907 posts

287 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
syncro. said:
I'd be tempted to say the efficiency of a machine that turns 10mm of movement from the expansion of ice into a few thousand revolutions of a generator will be extremely low, 10s of percent probably.
Don't forget that ice expands with incredible force - so any mechanism could be very highly geared...

What we really need is some kind of nuclear generator, extracting the energy from a few specks of uranium. But the lefties still wouldn't like it.

syncro.

186 posts

200 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
syncro. said:
I'd be tempted to say the efficiency of a machine that turns 10mm of movement from the expansion of ice into a few thousand revolutions of a generator will be extremely low, 10s of percent probably.
Don't forget that ice expands with incredible force - so any mechanism could be very highly geared...

What we really need is some kind of nuclear generator, extracting the energy from a few specks of uranium. But the lefties still wouldn't like it.
Yes but you can't 'gear' power, the amount of work the ice expanding does on the machine is just that, it can't be increased by gearing and that still doesn't overcome the fact that the majority of the energy is being lost in an incredibly inefficient machine.

karona

1,928 posts

208 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Trevelyan said:
Mr.Jimbo said:
Our new house uses some sort of magic mumbo jumbo to take heat out of the air, kind of like a reverse air conditioner (exactly like it in fact)

All I know is, the two units round the back of the garageblow out BLOODY cold air, and despite Dad explaining it to me a few times, I can't see the benefit of a system that takes heat out of the air in winter, as you'd get more heat in summer, and less in winter!
I think you mean an air source heat pump.

http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/Generate-your-...

In summary:

clicky linky said:
An air source heat pump extracts heat from the outside air in the same way that a fridge extracts heat from its inside. It can extract heat from the air even when the outside temperature is as low as minus 15° C.
'tis one of them that's warming me at this very moment. It uses about the same power as a one-bar electric fire. It's 21c inside and about -2 outside.
Better still, in the summer I just press a button on the remote and it all works back to front and cools the room to a nipple perking 16c.

Simpo Two

90,907 posts

287 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Soooo - if these air-source heat pumps are so good, why doesn't the Govt subsidise them? That would really help their green target, no?

jaybkay

488 posts

242 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Air sourced heat pumps can be very useful, in heating mode they can give out 4 or 5 times the amount of energy (as heat) as they consume in electricity.

In some of my underfloor heating systems I can heat a 3 bedroomed house using the same power as a single fan heater (2.5kW).

However they do use electricity which has to made and transported somehow, and the colder it is outside the less efficient the heat pump is.

Yes, you can use the ground as a source of heat, but this involves high capital cost - and a conventional heat pump fitted to an existing house only really heats one room (not the whole house).

New Zealand has relatively cheap electricity (much of it hydro etc), and we don't have freezing temperatures during the day so air sourced units are very suitable - however their use in the UK would be much more limited but there is still plenty of potential.

Lord Flathead

1,288 posts

201 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Soooo - if these air-source heat pumps are so good, why doesn't the Govt subsidise them? That would really help their green target, no?
Because they enjoy taxation from our fuel costs.

Simpo Two

90,907 posts

287 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Lord Flathead said:
Simpo Two said:
Soooo - if these air-source heat pumps are so good, why doesn't the Govt subsidise them? That would really help their green target, no?
Because they enjoy taxation from our fuel costs.
Fair point, I missed that. But if national energy usage fell, the utility companies would have to whack up the price of energy to retain profit, so the tax revenue would be the same... either that or the Govt could just increase the tax on fuel. Actually I hope they're not reading this frown

grumbledoak

32,336 posts

255 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
syncro. said:
You'll be needing this -> getmecoat and a copy of Thermodynamics for dummies (try Amazon)
This. And, buy the book.

In all the literature, just how many theories in Physics are routinely called "The Law(s) Of ..." ?