Footings for 2nd floor extension?

Footings for 2nd floor extension?

Author
Discussion

Rich135

Original Poster:

778 posts

249 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Hi chaps,

We are currently having some of our ground floor dug up to re-do the subfloor (with insulantion, DPM etc - proper job) before putting a new concrete floor in, then wood on top.

While we are there I thought I would investigate the depth of our footings on the original part of the house, where we would need to run a steel from, to join up with the wall of an extension, so that we know whether the footings are deap enough to take the load of a 2nd floor.

Anyone know how deep I should be looking for these to be? I will get a structural engineer in to inspect it once I have dug down, but interested to hear how far I will have to dig tonight!

Cheers

Rich



BiggusLaddus

821 posts

238 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Minimum of 450mm below ground level to avoid frost. Maybe a bit deeper to find good ground and if that was a long way down then mass concrete fill would normally be used to bring the strip footing back up to a reasonable level.

The ability of them to take the load from an additional floor is not so much down to how deep they are, more how wide and also how good the ground is.

eps

6,436 posts

276 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Under current regs, they need to be 1000 deep and 450 wide. Of course this depends on soil type and other ground conditions, but in general those figures hold true.

pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
From a project last year, 1000 deep, 600 wide for 2 floors (450 wide for single).

(I know this as I have a single floor, yet have 600 wide footings.. and observed arguments between builders, building control inspector and structural engineer!)

Rich135

Original Poster:

778 posts

249 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Thanks guys. We have dug down and found them to be about 1100mm deap (will check the width when I get in, but is at least 300mm), so hopefully that will be enough.

Structural engineer is coming Wednesday morning to assess it for me, so we can take any further action while we are there.

Thanks again.

Rich

camp freddie

255 posts

182 months

Tuesday 29th September 2009
quotequote all
As stated above they need to be typically 450mm below ground level for frost susceptibility.

The depth only becomes a concern with foundations in clay soils with nearby trees as the ground can shrink/ expand.

You should be fine with regards to depth, if you're supporting a beam you may have to locally widen the foundatio depending on the load

pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
Funny... this is what I had : 1000 x 600 for single story



Fixed price contract - they could dig it and fill it as deep/wide as they wanted!

pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
For bonus points, what's wrong with this / why would it not be permitted :



(The width was 450 in this one, but that's not the fault)

A - W

1,719 posts

222 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
For bonus points, what's wrong with this / why would it not be permitted :



(The width was 450 in this one, but that's not the fault)
At a guess, the manhole?


pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )



btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.

Edited by pikey on Wednesday 30th September 09:39

Leebo77

125 posts

214 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
We built single storey and dug down just over 1000....

....then building control noticed a 6 foot conifer in next doors garden and told us to go 2 metres along that side!


above sheet of ply is 8x4 for perspective

..and stepped back to 1000 for the return...



Conifer has since been cut down
rolleyes

jules_s

4,543 posts

240 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )



btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.

Edited by pikey on Wednesday 30th September 09:39
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.

eps

6,436 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
jules_s said:
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )



btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.

Edited by pikey on Wednesday 30th September 09:39
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.
+1

pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
jules_s said:
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )

btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.
Ok then...

Greenwich council's building control inspector identified it as a Class II public sewer and advised he needed authorisation from Thames Water to sign that element off.

Thames water required a formal application to build close to a public sewer. This, accompanied with a £600 cheque, includes correspondence, inspections, CCTV scans before and after and confirming the drawings are correct. With my works they advised that they required 600mm clearance and required drawings to show that the foundations were 600mm clear, as well as the pipes that fed into it were 600mm clear to the sides and on top (with shingle in between).

A Thames Water guide to these works is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...

The Thames Water application form is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...



pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
eps said:
+1
Not being funny but in your profile you say you're an architectural and planning professional so how is it someone in that career wouldn't know about this issue?

Neither my architect or builder spotted this and hence I incurred a 6 week delay. The building control inspector said this isn't anything new and was surprised it hadn't been highlighted to me.



eps

6,436 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
eps said:
+1
Not being funny but in your profile you say you're an architectural and planning professional so how is it someone in that career wouldn't know about this issue?

Neither my architect or builder spotted this and hence I incurred a 6 week delay. The building control inspector said this isn't anything new and was surprised it hadn't been highlighted to me.
We also cover all Building Control aspects smile

eps

6,436 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
jules_s said:
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )

btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.
Ok then...

Greenwich council's building control inspector identified it as a Class II public sewer and advised he needed authorisation from Thames Water to sign that element off.

Thames water required a formal application to build close to a public sewer. This, accompanied with a £600 cheque, includes correspondence, inspections, CCTV scans before and after and confirming the drawings are correct. With my works they advised that they required 600mm clearance and required drawings to show that the foundations were 600mm clear, as well as the pipes that fed into it were 600mm clear to the sides and on top (with shingle in between).

A Thames Water guide to these works is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...

The Thames Water application form is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...
You didn't say it was a class II public sewer!

pikey

7,702 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
eps said:
pikey said:
jules_s said:
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )

btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.
Ok then...

Greenwich council's building control inspector identified it as a Class II public sewer and advised he needed authorisation from Thames Water to sign that element off.

Thames water required a formal application to build close to a public sewer. This, accompanied with a £600 cheque, includes correspondence, inspections, CCTV scans before and after and confirming the drawings are correct. With my works they advised that they required 600mm clearance and required drawings to show that the foundations were 600mm clear, as well as the pipes that fed into it were 600mm clear to the sides and on top (with shingle in between).

A Thames Water guide to these works is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...

The Thames Water application form is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...
You didn't say it was a class II public sewer!
Yes I did:
pikey said:
the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Even if it was a class I / only served my house I still would have had to submit an application to build near it.

eps

6,436 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
eps said:
pikey said:
jules_s said:
pikey said:
Yep. You can't build within 600mm of a manhole.

Strangely neither my builder nor my architect had heard of this (even though this rule has been in place for a loooooooong time rolleyes )

btw, the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Yes you can...with the correct pipe protection....I'm not sure who told you that but it's bks.
Ok then...

Greenwich council's building control inspector identified it as a Class II public sewer and advised he needed authorisation from Thames Water to sign that element off.

Thames water required a formal application to build close to a public sewer. This, accompanied with a £600 cheque, includes correspondence, inspections, CCTV scans before and after and confirming the drawings are correct. With my works they advised that they required 600mm clearance and required drawings to show that the foundations were 600mm clear, as well as the pipes that fed into it were 600mm clear to the sides and on top (with shingle in between).

A Thames Water guide to these works is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...

The Thames Water application form is here http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/corp/bui...
You didn't say it was a class II public sewer!
Yes I did:
pikey said:
the manhole wasn't just for this house, it served a number of neighbour's houses as well.
Even if it was a class I / only served my house I still would have had to submit an application to build near it.
But you would be able to... smile

I was referring to your original post, not the later one, apologies as I missed that extra part.

Busamav

2,954 posts

215 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
pikey said:
[Greenwich council's building control inspector identified it as a Class II public sewer and advised he needed authorisation from Thames Water to sign that element off.

Thames water required a formal application to build close to a public sewer.
The building inspector should have picked that up when the Full Plans Building regs application was submitted.

Anything public within 3m needs this agreement .

The fact that it serves adjoining properties does not in itself make it a public sewer smile