Things you wouldn't have in the house

Things you wouldn't have in the house

Author
Discussion

Four Cofffee

Original Poster:

11,827 posts

242 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all

I don't mean Keri Katona,although that would be understandable, I mean things which we now see as politically incorrect.

I am a bit of an antique junkie and sometimes you see things which I like and think are just indicative of the times they were created. Others might not see it like that. For example you opften see taxidermy of animals now considered endangered, big cat rugs, ivory, elephant's foot stools, pictures made from real bird feathers, old Golly Wogs etc .

The latest thing I have taken a real liking to are the full sized Blackamoor figures of Black and Indian slaves and servants. I see them as nice antiques made in different times which remind us of how previous generations saw other people, and bloody good value as the PC brigade frown on them. Even though I work often in the equal ops/diversity field I am not offended by Golly Wogs and the old negro money boxes because again, they are a part of my history and culture as much as the images they might represent are part of the history of black people. I don't get offended by seeing servant bells knowing my gran was in service and not very well treated, or miners' lamps knowing that my ancestors might have been exploited and even died for a rich mine owner to build a fine house. I just see them as trinkets of a bygone age which brought us to where we are today.

So where do you draw the line on what you would have in the house?

stifler

37,068 posts

195 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Jehovas Witnesses.

Harry Flashman

19,946 posts

249 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
One night stands after 10am.

And Nazis. I don't like Nazis.

shirt

23,433 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Four Cofffee said:
I don't get offended by seeing servant bells knowing my gran was in service and not very well treated, or miners' lamps knowing that my ancestors might have been exploited and even died for a rich mine owner to build a fine house.
you were doing alright until this bit, wtf?

in answer though, i don't draw a line. even katona is welcome as long as she doesn't mind dealing with the consequences.

jon_80

216 posts

200 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Four Cofffee said:
I mean things which we now see as politically incorrect.
Personally I would take huge pleasure at anything in my place being politically incorrect. I've always wanted to have the front half of a badger or deer sticking out of one wall while its arse protrudes from the other side of the wall. People will be able to say things like "he must've been going like a rocket when he hit that wall"

I have a replica shrunken head, and (shock horror) it is not the head of a caucasian but that of an indigenous African gentleman.

Another thing I wouldn't have in the house is a council tax revaluation inspector. They'd be thrown out of an upstairs window while admiring the view.

Steamer

13,970 posts

220 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
A woman in a cardigan...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

277 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Socialists
A Pershing Missile
The French

Austin.J

888 posts

199 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
long legged pissed off puerto ricans.

sevros1981

718 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
dog poo

jon_80

216 posts

200 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Harriet Harman. She would soon receive proof that men are indeed capable of abusing women.

Duke Thrust

1,680 posts

246 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Those 70's cats bum tea towel holders and strip lights, can't stand them.

Oh, and anyone trying to sell me anything.

maser_spyder

6,356 posts

189 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
I was at an auction one day where one of the lots was a leather cased set of 6 Third Reich champagne flutes, complete with swastika engraved on each one. Absolutely mint condition.

Probably looted by an allied army person, so survived completely intact.

I though they were fascinating, and the hammer fell at about £150 which I though was a bargain.

Unfortunately, Mrs Maser refused to have them in the house, otherwise I would have been bidding!

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

202 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Cigarettes.

And not because they are un-PC but purely because they stink.

Lastinclass

511 posts

187 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
The mother in law!

Rarefied Brains

847 posts

212 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
jon_80 said:
Harriet Harman. She would soon receive proof that men are indeed capable of abusing women.
She's not my type, but each to their own biggrin

G_T

16,160 posts

197 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Crucifixes and religious artifacts of any Abrahamic religion.

fking voodooists.


elster

17,517 posts

217 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
why not a golly wog?

You do realise that it was a story?

It is about as daft as saying the railway children are banned in your house due to their HSE faux pas'.

Not having a doll based on the colour is not conforming to political correctness, it is just being dumb.

SoapyShowerBoy

1,775 posts

202 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Steamer said:
A woman in a cardigan...
or dressing gown after 9.30am


shoutGET BLOODY DRESSED YOU OAF!

escargot

17,111 posts

224 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Cats. Evil little bds.

Edited by escargot on Thursday 6th August 11:05

sleep envy

62,260 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
dust