Painting costs

Author
Discussion

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
Found myself in an odd situation where I believe that we are vastly overpaying for a job that’s just started.

Booked a painter in march to paint in front of house in June, June came and went and was told July, then told we were next and got strung along till middle of August where painter said he wouldn’t have time to do the job.

We managed to find a last minute painter on Facebook and price was £300 more than the other painter but thought we won’t find anyone else this late in the year and used the guy.

Cost was £1100 and he took 3 days and did an okay job.

He asked if we wanted side and back of house (back is just 1 floor) also painted and gave us a quote of £2500.

We assumed as it’s a bigger area than the front it would take double the time, hence double the cost.

He started today and managed to clean, prep and add primer to rear, and add primer to side of house (new render)… and said he just needs one more day to finish up..

I was pretty much taken aback that he’s completing it in 2 days when he’s charged £2500.. he’s just supplying tools and labour..

I did mention to him that when we got the quote we thought it was a bigger job than the other one hence the higher price but he said he charges per m2 not on time.

Do we just have to suck it up? Just feel like we have been taken advantage of..

Cheers


nuyorican

1,807 posts

109 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
He gave you a price to do a job which you accept. He then does the job in less time than you were expecting, and you’re unhappy?

Wow.

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
nuyorican said:
He gave you a price to do a job which you accept. He then does the job in less time than you were expecting, and you’re unhappy?

Wow.
I’m asking is it reasonable for a single painter to be charging over £1k a day for labour.

Would anyone expect a labour only job priced at 2.5k to take two days..

Are either of these reasonable?

Honestly we would have got more quotes if we knew it was a 2 day job..


Edited by bowboy on Wednesday 30th October 20:05

StoutBench

352 posts

35 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
Not sure the timing is relevant, it's the job you are paying for.

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
StoutBench said:
Not sure the timing is relevant, it's the job you are paying for.
I feel like your missing the point.

I’m asking is it reasonable for a single painter to be charging over £1k a day for labour.

Would anyone expect a labour only job priced at 2.5k to take two days..

Are either of these reasonable?

Honestly we would have got more quotes if we knew it was a 2 day job..

nuyorican

1,807 posts

109 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
Painter seems to understand business. And is a decent painter I’m guessing. Send his number please.

thepritch

1,079 posts

172 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
Been there myself and sucked it up as I accepted the cost.

I find it endlessly fascinating how people quote or how people believe someone should quote. The cost of something shouldn’t necessarily be tied to how long it takes.

Was it of value to you? That’s the question you should be asking IMO.

BoRED S2upid

20,319 posts

247 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
So £3600 to prepare, prime and I presume 2 coats for the whole house. Seems reasonable enough.

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
thepritch said:
Been there myself and sucked it up as I accepted the cost.

I find it endlessly fascinating how people quote or how people believe someone should quote. The cost of something shouldn’t necessarily be tied to how long it takes.

Was it of value to you? That’s the question you should be asking IMO.
Yes I feel we accepted the quote like fools, so just have to suck it up.

Just leaves a bitter taste paying over £1k a day for labour… which is unjustifiable imho

StoutBench

352 posts

35 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
So if the same job took a week you'd be happy? Maybe take the win, you were happy with the cost and the job is done fast and out of your way.

Yes it's a lot a day but imagine if you'd gone with someone cheaper and they did a terrible job.

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
nuyorican said:
Painter seems to understand business. And is a decent painter I’m guessing. Send his number please.
Just a handyman.. can’t imagine he would get much business if he was to charge everyone £1250 a day for labour

nuyorican

1,807 posts

109 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
bowboy said:
Just a handyman.. can’t imagine he would get much business if he was to charge everyone £1250 a day for labour
No indeed.

That’s why you price per job. Then use your years of experience and training to get it done as quickly as possible.

bowboy

Original Poster:

116 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
StoutBench said:
So if the same job took a week you'd be happy? Maybe take the win, you were happy with the cost and the job is done fast and out of your way.

Yes it's a lot a day but imagine if you'd gone with someone cheaper and they did a terrible job.
It’s stupid but yes I’d feel less ripped off.

Just don’t understand the pricing, job 1 say £350 a day, job 2 £1250 a day, doesn’t make sense to me? Other than he thought we are mugs?

hmg

629 posts

126 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
It’s very unreasonable but you did accept the quote.

For comparison I have 2 decorators.

One that I’ve used for 30yrs that is good for a quick refresh but not as thorough in his prep..he’s super quick, efficient and trustworthy. Even now he’s 140 day and doesn’t take the p on material costs.

He'd have done the front of your house in a couple of days and you would be happy.

The others are a bigger firm that do a very thorough job with much more prep

Just had my HSL done which was quoted as 3 men for 5 days at 3100 ex materials So around 200 per man per day..I accepted the quote.

It ended up as 2 men for 4.5 days and an extra man for a couple of hours. So approx 345 pmpd.

A ‘school hours’ work day with playtime/lunch/playtime finish at 3.30pm and 2.00pm on a Friday seems to be the norm for most trades too..

Whilst I appreciate the average trade won’t get out of bed for less than 350 a day nowadays paying its effectively 60ph for a decorating job..

Whilst they have done a quality job I feel less likely to use them again as just like you I tend to break the job down into what I feel is reasonable for the quality/price/labour ratio.

If I feel like this you must feel like you’ve been bent over..

OutInTheShed

9,308 posts

33 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
I have a couple of friends who do this work.
The rates quoted are on the high side, to say the least.

You either accept a quote and don't care how long it takes to do the job, so long as the quality is OK. Or you pay an hourly rate and it takes as long as it takes and you trust the tradesman not to waste time.

All academic, as both were loaded with work until next year, especially not looking at outdoor work as they both have backlogs of jobs waiting for dry days.

nuyorican

1,807 posts

109 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
£140 a day?

That guy is either a bit simple, is retired/on benefits or lives in his van.

hmg

629 posts

126 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
nuyorican said:
£140 a day?

That guy is either a bit simple, is retired/on benefits or lives in his van.
Non of the above …a bit old school yes but a lovely guy…he’s put his prices up a tenner a day this year though. biglaugh

I’ve even told him straight he needs to put his prices up but he's unsurprisingly got a loyal customer base..I would imagine he feels wrongly if he put his prices up by too much they would go elsewhere. Elsewhere doesn’t exist at his quality/price ratio though.

BoRED S2upid

20,319 posts

247 months

Wednesday 30th October
quotequote all
bowboy said:
Yes I feel we accepted the quote like fools, so just have to suck it up.

Just leaves a bitter taste paying over £1k a day for labour… which is unjustifiable imho
So you go over it with a fine tooth comb before paying the balance. You have paid for first class make sure you’ve got it and he hasn’t cut corners.

gotoPzero

18,155 posts

196 months

Thursday 31st October
quotequote all
When it comes to self employed trades you have 2 main choices. Pay a day rate, and take the risk that they just plod along. Or pay a one off cost and take the risk that they will rush through the job as quick as they can.

IME, its rare to find traders who are not up against time to get onto their next job. Sometimes squeezing in jobs they should not take or something else comes in so they rush the job they are on to get off onto the better job.

The only good one I have found is a P&D who seems to work at the exact same pace every time we have used him. Comes at 7am. Stops for a brew at 10am dead on for 20 minutes, radio on, news paper out. Same at 1pm. At 3pm he is washing his brushes. By 315pm he is sat on the back of his van having the last of the tea out of his flask.

Those are rare beasts these days IME.

DonkeyApple

58,891 posts

176 months

Thursday 31st October
quotequote all
bowboy said:
I feel like your missing the point.

I’m asking is it reasonable for a single painter to be charging over £1k a day for labour.

Would anyone expect a labour only job priced at 2.5k to take two days..

Are either of these reasonable?

Honestly we would have got more quotes if we knew it was a 2 day job..
I think it's absolutely fine for you to question your decision and to ask on PH what a general view might be.

What I don't think you can do is anything about it. You agreed terms and they've done as agreed so ultimately all is fair.

Was £2500 a high price for 2 days unskilled labour? I would say so but arguably the time to consider value was before agreeing terms.

On the flipside, had you agreed a day rate then in all likelihood the time would have increased to meet the £2500 cost and also, as you've directly experienced, there isn't a glut of trades at present so they are able to command much higher fees than would be normal.

Arguably, the big premium that you've paid is for the actual skill which is the ability of the chap to actually do what he agreed to do which is to paint the house on the day he agreed to paint the house. The ability to actually turn up when agreed, to do the actual job and to an acceptable level, is today, the skill that you're paying for. And one could also consider them only being on site for two days instead of a week and added bonus?

One might suspect that the customers of the painter you attempted to initially used might be very envious of your great luck and would have far preferred to pay a premium for not being someone's carer. smile