1.89% Mortgage tracker - anything better?

1.89% Mortgage tracker - anything better?

Author
Discussion

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
Looking to move the mortgage for a better deal than current (5.25%)

There's all sorts of deals out there with fixed rates etc but this tracker seems good while things are low.

We are in contact with an IFA who has provided good advice over the last 18 years but I'm interested to know what's the good deals and current thinking.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

248 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
Looking to move the mortgage for a better deal than current (5.25%)

There's all sorts of deals out there with fixed rates etc but this tracker seems good while things are low.

We are in contact with an IFA who has provided good advice over the last 18 years but I'm interested to know what's the good deals and current thinking.
Is this the FD lifetime tracker?

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
I think so - it was my wife who mentioned it to me and we're with FD now

Manks

27,365 posts

228 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all


That sounds like a hot rate in this day and age. I am guesssing it's a lowish loan to value and pristine credit history only.

Manks

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Yes, it is the FD tracker and LTV is low (loan is 20% of value)

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

248 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
Yes, it is the FD tracker and LTV is low (loan is 20% of value)
It is 65% LTV IIRC - will lend 3.5x single, 2.75x joint, bonuses not taken into account.

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
I think so - affording it is not an issue - it's getting the best value product

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

248 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
it's getting the best value product
I think it is, assuming you are happy with tracker

DH2

311 posts

270 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
assuming you are happy with tracker
This is the rub... I have been looking at the same product (although at 1.99% - perhaps because I'm not an existing customer?), but then started reading the news about OECD recommending we have a 3%+ base rate in 12 months time... maybe a fix now would be a good idea...?

Time to grovel around for my crystal balls!

DH2

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

248 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
DH2 said:
NoelWatson said:
assuming you are happy with tracker
This is the rub... I have been looking at the same product (although at 1.99% - perhaps because I'm not an existing customer?), but then started reading the news about OECD recommending we have a 3%+ base rate in 12 months time... maybe a fix now would be a good idea...?

Time to grovel around for my crystal balls!

DH2
Not sure where you are getting 1.99% from?

http://www2.firstdirect.com/1/2/mortgages/repaymen...

As for fix, depends how much premium you are prepared to pay for peace of mind.

DH2

311 posts

270 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
Not sure where you are getting 1.99% from?
http://www2.firstdirect.com/1/2/mortgages/repaymen...
Valid point, well made. I'm looking at an offset... http://www2.firstdirect.com/1/2/mortgages/offset-m...

NoelWatson said:
As for fix, depends how much premium you are prepared to pay for peace of mind.
Yep. As I'm just coming out of a 6% fix, anything is an improvement rate-wise, and the base rate has to come up a fair way to get me back to where I am now (on the 1.99% above rate). Decisions-decisions.

Actually I'd value any opinion on use of an offset. I have a stash of cash equal to about 40% of my loan, currently in ISA, so I'd lose tax-free status on it, but I figure it is worth far more against the loan at present?
I'm currently overpaying on my monthly payment by almost 100% - is it sensible to keep doing that with an offset, or is it better to put that overpayment into the offset? Perhaps a bit of both might be a good approach.

DH2

Edited: 300 posts in just over 8 years, get me!

Edited by DH2 on Friday 28th May 13:22

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
LOL 300 posts!

We're just coming out of an offset which was best at the time - over 40% of the loan in FD accounts and overpayment has made a big difference to the capital sum.

At this point in time and due to the fuzzy, slightly cloudy crystal ball the tracker appears to be a good option, even if the rates do climb the overpayment is sufficiently flexible to accomodate quite a severe base rate rise.

Manks

27,365 posts

228 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
Ranger 6 said:
it's getting the best value product
I think it is, assuming you are happy with tracker
Personally I have always sought out base rate trackers for the simple reason that, very broadly, base rate will reflect where we all are economically so I am happy to expose myself to it. Furthermore if interest rates rise I am, within reason, going to be able to cover the payments.

Four or five years ago I took out a lifetime 0.49 over BOE base tracker and I am pleased I did, for obvious reasons.

Trackers don't work for everyone though. If mortgage rate increases were likely to cripple me, I'd look a lot more closely at fixes.

Manks

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

255 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Manks said:
....I took out a lifetime 0.49 over BOE base tracker....
lucky, lucky, bd..... [/python]

squeezebm

2,319 posts

211 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

248 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
squeezebm said:
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48
Yes, but weren't there some that got below base on a lifetime tracker?

deevlash

10,442 posts

243 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
squeezebm said:
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48
me too

Vron

2,538 posts

215 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
deevlash said:
squeezebm said:
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48
me too
Not as happy as me with + 0.17% party

Manks

27,365 posts

228 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
squeezebm said:
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48
Yes, but weren't there some that got below base on a lifetime tracker?
Not heard of any lifetime trackers below base. There were a few with an initial term below base but they reverted above it.

Manks

Manks

27,365 posts

228 months

Saturday 29th May 2010
quotequote all
Vron said:
deevlash said:
squeezebm said:
Reading this, I should be happy with my lifetime .99% above BOE base then ???



Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 29th May 14:48
me too
Not as happy as me with + 0.17% party
Sounds like a Woolwich product to me, which tracks the Barclays base rate - usually the same as BoE base rate but not necessarily so.

Manks