So Now that China have got us by the goolies
Discussion
Their putting the squeeze on, interesting to see if we fight back
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11584...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11584...
The Chinese are running out of friends in the USA at a rapid rate. Political figures calling for trade barriers are becoming more concerted.
At the end of the day, although politicians in the UK and Europe (and Japan and South Korea for that matter) are outwardly less bullish and aggressive in these matters, eventually they may be pursuaded otherwise.
China is already at odds with most free market opinion, iwth regard to its artificially weak (thereby helping exports) currency, this puts them further into the 'wrong', or is perhaps an 'insurance' for the relative appreciation of their currency if US and UK attempts at devaluation (i.e. QE) succeed - that if Chinese exports of chepa tat reduce, then some of the loss can be defrayed by higher mineral prices. The Chinese unelected goverment know they will have a proper revolution on their hands if the newly affluent and aspiriing to be affluent classes see the economy shrinking.
At the end of the day, although politicians in the UK and Europe (and Japan and South Korea for that matter) are outwardly less bullish and aggressive in these matters, eventually they may be pursuaded otherwise.
China is already at odds with most free market opinion, iwth regard to its artificially weak (thereby helping exports) currency, this puts them further into the 'wrong', or is perhaps an 'insurance' for the relative appreciation of their currency if US and UK attempts at devaluation (i.e. QE) succeed - that if Chinese exports of chepa tat reduce, then some of the loss can be defrayed by higher mineral prices. The Chinese unelected goverment know they will have a proper revolution on their hands if the newly affluent and aspiriing to be affluent classes see the economy shrinking.
I think it further shows just how clever the Chinese are at understanding the world economy. Not bad for a non-western state.
And I think the headline grabbers in the west like to stir up anti-chinese opinion with regards to this.
As mentioned the USA are always complaining about the chinese currency, but surely the chinese are allowed to protect their interests just as the american 'protect' their interests in the middle-east.
I am becoming more and more aware of the 'tit-for-tat' nature of global politics. It seems to me that the dodgey capitalist model of the west of late is stirring up a lot of anti-chinese 'stories' and 'news'.
Just my opinion by the way.
And I think the headline grabbers in the west like to stir up anti-chinese opinion with regards to this.
As mentioned the USA are always complaining about the chinese currency, but surely the chinese are allowed to protect their interests just as the american 'protect' their interests in the middle-east.
I am becoming more and more aware of the 'tit-for-tat' nature of global politics. It seems to me that the dodgey capitalist model of the west of late is stirring up a lot of anti-chinese 'stories' and 'news'.
Just my opinion by the way.
This is more an issue of China requiring that products sold in China have an increasing amount of locally soured added-value. You can have the raw materials from China's mines, but they want you to produce the end-product in China and then exporting it, which clearly earns them a lot more.
(I'm thankfull that we still have our working coal mines and are not dependent on Russian gas being piped through "emotional" countries. Oh..wait..)
(I'm thankfull that we still have our working coal mines and are not dependent on Russian gas being piped through "emotional" countries. Oh..wait..)
fido said:
So it's their mineral resources? They don't tell us what we can or can't export, or by how much?
True up to a pointBut they drove all competitors out of the market by dumping and are now seeking to exploit their monopoly position. Restricting their exports is an act of commercial aggression.
BOR said:
This is more an issue of China requiring that products sold in China have an increasing amount of locally soured added-value. You can have the raw materials from China's mines, but they want you to produce the end-product in China and then exporting it, which clearly earns them a lot more.
Which might be a valid point if the Chinese were primarily a commodities exporter, like the Australians, rather than one of the worlds leading manufacturing exporters.AJI said:
I am becoming more and more aware of the 'tit-for-tat' nature of global politics. It seems to me that the dodgey capitalist model of the west of late is stirring up a lot of anti-chinese 'stories' and 'news'.
Just my opinion by the way.
I was/am very suspicious about the way the Toyota recals were dealt with by the press, especailly in the USA.Just my opinion by the way.
Like Ford or GM never had any issues...
And don't get me started in Renault and their faulty bonnets...

JagLover said:
fido said:
So it's their mineral resources? They don't tell us what we can or can't export, or by how much?
True up to a pointBut they drove all competitors out of the market by dumping and are now seeking to exploit their monopoly position. Restricting their exports is an act of commercial aggression.
Shay HTFC said:
JagLover said:
fido said:
So it's their mineral resources? They don't tell us what we can or can't export, or by how much?
True up to a pointBut they drove all competitors out of the market by dumping and are now seeking to exploit their monopoly position. Restricting their exports is an act of commercial aggression.
It is Mercantalism
In a free market their currency would have risen some time ago and rival producers of exotic metals wouldn't have been driven out of business by dumping.
JagLover said:
Shay HTFC said:
JagLover said:
fido said:
So it's their mineral resources? They don't tell us what we can or can't export, or by how much?
True up to a pointBut they drove all competitors out of the market by dumping and are now seeking to exploit their monopoly position. Restricting their exports is an act of commercial aggression.
It is Mercantalism
In a free market their currency would have risen some time ago and rival producers of exotic metals wouldn't have been driven out of business by dumping.
Fittster said:
JagLover said:
Shay HTFC said:
JagLover said:
fido said:
So it's their mineral resources? They don't tell us what we can or can't export, or by how much?
True up to a pointBut they drove all competitors out of the market by dumping and are now seeking to exploit their monopoly position. Restricting their exports is an act of commercial aggression.
It is Mercantalism
In a free market their currency would have risen some time ago and rival producers of exotic metals wouldn't have been driven out of business by dumping.
Digga said:
Perhaps beacuse, in part, China's refusal to float their currency necessitates devaluation or death for developed nations?
IndeedJust as the Great Depression was not caused merely by the wall street crash and had its roots in the imbalances built up as a result of the 1st world war and accompanying issues such as reparations.
The 'great recession' had its roots in the imbalances built up over the past decade before the crash.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




at times.