Question Time - 08-07-10
Discussion
My god, what a whiny little t
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!Edited by Wing Commander on Thursday 8th July 22:54
Wing Commander said:
My god, what a whiny little t
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!
I thought that was a really ugly girl... was I wrong/?
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!Edited by Wing Commander on Thursday 8th July 22:54
Magog said:
Wing Commander said:
My god, what a whiny little t
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!
I thought that was a really ugly girl... was I wrong/?
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!Edited by Wing Commander on Thursday 8th July 22:54
Gun said:
Magog said:
Wing Commander said:
My god, what a whiny little t
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!
I thought that was a really ugly girl... was I wrong/?
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!Edited by Wing Commander on Thursday 8th July 22:54
<assertion>...but those nasty Tories are really enjoying making cuts</assertion>
Is that really the extent of the argument against? I just don't get why the implied assertion that a small state is bad gets applause. Do the audience really want Nanny State running their entire lives and giving them a bit of pocket money?
Also can none of these idiots do the basic maths? Perhaps they are aware of a magical money tree which can be used to fund the country in the absence of the requisite amount of usually sourced funds.
Is that really the extent of the argument against? I just don't get why the implied assertion that a small state is bad gets applause. Do the audience really want Nanny State running their entire lives and giving them a bit of pocket money?
Also can none of these idiots do the basic maths? Perhaps they are aware of a magical money tree which can be used to fund the country in the absence of the requisite amount of usually sourced funds.
Sheets Tabuer said:
Here we go, a country with a population less than london saying scrap trident and give us the money.
They'll be asking for their oil revenues next.Personally I can't envisage a scenario where we would/could independently use our Trident nuclear weapons, or be allowed to, and so if we're really sat under the US umbrella, we might as well save the cash on the Trident replacement and realise we are no longer a great sabre rattling power anymore.
Phil1 said:
<assertion>...but those nasty Tories are really enjoying making cuts</assertion>
Is that really the extent of the argument against? I just don't get why the implied assertion that a small state is bad gets applause. Do the audience really want Nanny State running their entire lives and giving them a bit of pocket money?
Also can none of these idiots do the basic maths? Perhaps they are aware of a magical money tree which can be used to fund the country in the absence of the requisite amount of usually sourced funds.
There seems to be a great number of people who want the state to run their lives and until the last election the state was happy to oblige. I don't suppose things will get any better under the coalition but I live in hope.Is that really the extent of the argument against? I just don't get why the implied assertion that a small state is bad gets applause. Do the audience really want Nanny State running their entire lives and giving them a bit of pocket money?
Also can none of these idiots do the basic maths? Perhaps they are aware of a magical money tree which can be used to fund the country in the absence of the requisite amount of usually sourced funds.
Gun said:
Magog said:
Wing Commander said:
My god, what a whiny little t
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!
I thought that was a really ugly girl... was I wrong/?
t that kid was. Boo f
king hoo. Get a haircut, and a backbone. I was made redundant tail end of March but have done various temp jobs to bring in money to live. If I was there, I would kick him square in the b
ks. Argh!!Edited by Wing Commander on Thursday 8th July 22:54

excel789 said:
There seems to be a great number of people who want the state to run their lives and until the last election the state was happy to oblige. I don't suppose things will get any better under the coalition but I live in hope.
No, socialists are natural control freaks...far ahead of any others.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





.