UK Troops under US command in Afghanistan
UK Troops under US command in Afghanistan
Author
Discussion

Wanta996Gotta

Original Poster:

5,622 posts

237 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
Good to see the new Coalition keeping the Special relationship going but this is surely taking the piss - i blame the Liberals

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8697371.stm

FourWheelDrift

92,325 posts

314 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
It's a NATO forces thing. Happens all the time, during WWII our forces were under the command of Eisenhower.

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
at least it will make it easier for our lads to nick some decent kit (wern't we under us command in desert storm under stormin norman?)

Wanta996Gotta

Original Poster:

5,622 posts

237 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
It's a NATO forces thing. Happens all the time, during WWII our forces were under the command of Eisenhower.
Very true but thats not how Al Jazeera and the fundamentalists will spin it. I also dread to think the uproar from the "Liberals??" when some of our boys get "hurt" under US command.

5unny

4,395 posts

212 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It's a NATO forces thing. Happens all the time, during WWII our forces were under the command of Eisenhower.
Very true but thats not how Al Jazeera and the fundamentalists will spin it. I also dread to think the uproar from the "Liberals??" when some of our boys get "hurt" under US command.
I don't think the Islamists care whether the 'infidel occupiers' are American, Brits or any other Nato force. They treat them all the same.

As for the Liberals, well it's easy to be anti war sitting in opposition but as Obama soon found out, it's a different story when you're actually in power.

FourWheelDrift

92,325 posts

314 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
And don't forget it was a Liberal government (under Asquith) who took us into WWI. So they aren't entirely anti-war either. smile

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

234 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
Well if they are under american command it does lessen the chances of the americans shooting them

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

207 months

Friday 21st May 2010
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
Good to see the new Coalition keeping the Special relationship going but this is surely taking the piss - i blame the Liberals

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8697371.stm
Two holes in this latest of your transparent party-political trolling:

1) The decision was made long before the election.

2) As labour continually refused to invest in the needed helicopters to operate effectively in Afghanistan causing our troops to have to rely continually on the US for transport, we may as well be under their command.