BBC grammar goes from bad to worser ...
Discussion
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
FourWheelDrift said:
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
She's a Cambridge graduate who is fluent in four languages (according to the infallible Wikipedia), so I'm guessing it was a genuine slip of the tongue in a live broadcast, not a sign of falling grammatical standards at the Beeb.youngsyr said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
She's a Cambridge graduate who is fluent in four languages (according to the infallible Wikipedia), so I'm guessing it was a genuine slip of the tongue in a live broadcast, not a sign of falling grammatical standards at the Beeb.youngsyr said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
She's a Cambridge graduate who is fluent in four languages (according to the infallible Wikipedia), so I'm guessing it was a genuine slip of the tongue in a live broadcast, not a sign of falling grammatical standards at the Beeb.ShadownINja said:
youngsyr said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
She's a Cambridge graduate who is fluent in four languages (according to the infallible Wikipedia), so I'm guessing it was a genuine slip of the tongue in a live broadcast, not a sign of falling grammatical standards at the Beeb.youngsyr said:
ShadownINja said:
youngsyr said:
FourWheelDrift said:
It is possible she read ahead and added "between" herself before reading what was on the Autocue. Just anticipated something that would normally describe what she was saying, such as "between the ages of 16 and 24" but the person who wrote the news item put "young people aged 16 to 24".
She's a Cambridge graduate who is fluent in four languages (according to the infallible Wikipedia), so I'm guessing it was a genuine slip of the tongue in a live broadcast, not a sign of falling grammatical standards at the Beeb.Evangelion said:
Just heard on the lunchtime news with Emily Maitliss:
"Unemployment is worst among young people aged between 16 to 24"
What's the problem? Everyone understands what she means. Descriptive grammar > proscriptive grammar tbfh."Unemployment is worst among young people aged between 16 to 24"
Edited by Parrot of Doom on Thursday 17th September 13:13
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff