BP in 'giant' new oil discovery

BP in 'giant' new oil discovery

Author
Discussion

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

189 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8233504.stm

Did we have a Mexican terrorist to hand over?

youngsyr

14,742 posts

198 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
BP said:
{the discovery would} "support the continuing growth of our deepwater Gulf of Mexico business into the second half of the next decade".
Aren't fossil fuels supposed to have run out by then? confused

Edited by youngsyr on Wednesday 2nd September 12:23

Steamer

13,962 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
bounce Waaaheeey!! Cheaper petrol for all! Now I can afford to run my 635 again...


....oh, you mean it doesnt work that way, and you've just put the price up again frown

Oakey

27,760 posts

222 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
BP said:
{the discovery would} "support the continuing growth of our deepwater Gulf of Mexico business into the second half of the next decade".
Aren't fossil fuels supposed to have run out by then? confused

Edited by youngsyr on Wednesday 2nd September 12:23
If fossil fuels weren't running out there'd be no excuse for high prices wink

turbobloke

106,943 posts

266 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
BP said:
{the discovery would} "support the continuing growth of our deepwater Gulf of Mexico business into the second half of the next decade".
Aren't fossil fuels supposed to have run out by then? confused
I was told at school, by the traditional elbow patched geography teacher, that fossil fuels would have run out before 2000. It's all very confusing.

We also have to ponder the outpourings of milibandism at the DECC where fanciful erections abound. By erections I refer to 3 windymills per day to 2020, of course, which is in any case a totally risible notion in keeping with the 2000 fossil fuel myth.

What will have run out before 2020 is an adequate supply of electicity in this country, one capable of meeting commercial and domestic demand - which is why what passes for a UK government is keen to put interactive power consumption devices into our homes and businesses. On the surface this is supposedly to allow us to monitor consumption in real time, running off in all directions to take our PCs and TVs off standby with one hand while fitting expensive mercury-laden 'green' bulbs with the other. In reality these are devices to be put in place to allow electricity suppliers to ration electricity when our creaking energy security finally crumbles and the sum total of all the windymills and assorted green rhubarb is shown to be worth zilch.

Supposedly the spin beforehand and damage limitation after the fact is supposed to work better if our cuts are 'managed' in this way. We'll still be in the dark, which is where politicians are over energy security and where their true belief in the utter tosh and drivel of environ mentalism has placed them.

FourWheelDrift

89,441 posts

290 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
Mexico they say?

BBC said:
The company said it drilled the well, dubbed Tiber, to a total depth of about 35,055ft (10,685m), making it one of the deepest wells ever drilled.
Anyone else think they are trying to drill directly through the earth to steal the Arabs oil?



There's an idea wink

tonyvid

9,875 posts

249 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Mexico they say?

BBC said:
The company said it drilled the well, dubbed Tiber, to a total depth of about 35,055ft (10,685m), making it one of the deepest wells ever drilled.
Anyone else think they are trying to drill directly through the earth to steal the Arabs oil?



There's an idea wink
hehe

I always thought oil was made from squashed trees and stuff - that's a lot of mud on top of the trees-of-old!!! yikes

nonuts

15,855 posts

235 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
That is rather deep! yikes

On the security point I do wish our government would just grow a pair and get building the reactors we desperately need.

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

253 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
I was told at school, by the traditional elbow patched geography teacher, that fossil fuels would have run out before 2000. It's all very confusing.
.
I rather doubt that to be fair. I certainly remember being told that North Sea Oil would run out in the early part of this centuary, but certainly not 'fossil fuels' in general. Perhaps you are remembering what you 'want' to remember?


however, I still want to know where the hell my flying car is.....

Edited by Tony*T3 on Wednesday 2nd September 12:54


Edited by Tony*T3 on Wednesday 2nd September 13:02

Groober

775 posts

186 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
Tony*T3 said:
turbobloke said:
I was told at school, by the traditional elbow patched geography teacher, that fossil fuels would have run out before 2000. It's all very confusing.
.
I rather doubt that to be fair. I certainly remember being told that North Sea Oil would run out in the early part of this centuary, but certainly not 'fossil fuels' in general. Perhaps you are remembering what you 'want' to remember?


however, I still want to know where the help my flying car is.....

Edited by Tony*T3 on Wednesday 2nd September 12:54
Fossil fuels will still be king in one form or another for the forseable future.

turbobloke

106,943 posts

266 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
Tony*T3 said:
turbobloke said:
I was told at school, by the traditional elbow patched geography teacher, that fossil fuels would have run out before 2000. It's all very confusing.
.
I rather doubt that to be fair. I certainly remember being told that North Sea Oil would run out in the early part of this centuary, but certainly not 'fossil fuels' in general. Perhaps you are remembering what you 'want' to remember?
No, that was it. Fossil fuels, not just one of them. It wasn't the only nonsense taught as fact, most of us could point to lots more given a bit of time. Not that it's much better today with too many teachers willingly greenified beyond what's healthy or accurate.

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

253 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Tony*T3 said:
turbobloke said:
I was told at school, by the traditional elbow patched geography teacher, that fossil fuels would have run out before 2000. It's all very confusing.
.
I rather doubt that to be fair. I certainly remember being told that North Sea Oil would run out in the early part of this centuary, but certainly not 'fossil fuels' in general. Perhaps you are remembering what you 'want' to remember?
No, that was it. Fossil fuels, not just one of them. It wasn't the only nonsense taught as fact, most of us could point to lots more given a bit of time. Not that it's much better today with too many teachers willingly greenified beyond what's healthy or accurate.
he must have been a real clown then. Was he still teaching 'flat earth' theory too....? smile

I'm guessing from your previous posts that your probably late 40's? If so, your geography teacher should have known a lot better than to spout that rubbish. Most of Asia floats on a base of fossil fuels. Huge areas even now still relativly unexplored in terms of oil fields.


Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

200 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
I am outraged.....that my thread was the one closed...despite being posted a whole 2 minutes earlier!!!! Outraged!!!!




.....and breath......


But seriously, you'd like to think this will have an effect on the prices. But I'm not sure it will.

MaxAndRuby

6,792 posts

238 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
There must be some sort of statistics available on an hourly(at least) basis, which compares global consumption with global stocks, estimated yield from current fields, etc, etc, to give us a rough estimate of current longevity of oil?

SLacKer

2,622 posts

213 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
tonyvid said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Mexico they say?

BBC said:
The company said it drilled the well, dubbed Tiber, to a total depth of about 35,055ft (10,685m), making it one of the deepest wells ever drilled.
Anyone else think they are trying to drill directly through the earth to steal the Arabs oil?



There's an idea wink
hehe

I always thought oil was made from squashed trees and stuff - that's a lot of mud on top of the trees-of-old!!! yikes
That is one pile of mud...... I think they invented subduction to explain this.

If one thing is clear over the last few years the less oil/gas dependency we have the better. The wombles who have the oil/gas seem to be somewhat unstable (not all of em but enough) and hold ourselves to ransom. So we need to generate electricity from anything but fossil fuels. So wind, wave and Nuclear are required. Of course we have been held back in the fission stakes by the same tts who are now telling us we are all doomed from global warming.

All I want is a Mr Fusion (1.21 gigawatts should be enough for all my crap left on standby) to run off rain water and rubbish to run my house - not much to ask surely.

abz

376 posts

235 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
Halb said:
Did we have a Mexican terrorist to hand over?
how does that work...?? This is in the US.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

215 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
Be interested to see how BP can moan now... scratchchin

youngsyr

14,742 posts

198 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
abz said:
Halb said:
Did we have a Mexican terrorist to hand over?
how does that work...?? This is in the US.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/pentagon-hacker-in-last-bid-to-avoid-extradition-1701101.html

tonyvid

9,875 posts

249 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
SLacKer said:
That is one pile of mud...... I think they invented subduction to explain this.

If one thing is clear over the last few years the less oil/gas dependency we have the better. The wombles who have the oil/gas seem to be somewhat unstable (not all of em but enough) and hold ourselves to ransom. So we need to generate electricity from anything but fossil fuels. So wind, wave and Nuclear are required. Of course we have been held back in the fission stakes by the same tts who are now telling us we are all doomed from global warming.

All I want is a Mr Fusion (1.21 gigawatts should be enough for all my crap left on standby) to run off rain water and rubbish to run my house - not much to ask surely.
I forgot about plate tectonics(sp?).... it must have taken such biblical timescales for all this to happen, it makes you feel about >< that big.

wobble

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

220 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2009
quotequote all
SLacKer said:
tonyvid said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Mexico they say?

BBC said:
The company said it drilled the well, dubbed Tiber, to a total depth of about 35,055ft (10,685m), making it one of the deepest wells ever drilled.
Anyone else think they are trying to drill directly through the earth to steal the Arabs oil?



There's an idea wink
hehe

I always thought oil was made from squashed trees and stuff - that's a lot of mud on top of the trees-of-old!!! yikes
That is one pile of mud...... I think they invented subduction to explain this.

If one thing is clear over the last few years the less oil/gas dependency we have the better. The wombles who have the oil/gas seem to be somewhat unstable (not all of em but enough) and hold ourselves to ransom. So we need to generate electricity from anything but fossil fuels. So wind, wave and Nuclear are required. Of course we have been held back in the fission stakes by the same tts who are now telling us we are all doomed from global warming.

All I want is a Mr Fusion (1.21 gigawatts should be enough for all my crap left on standby) to run off rain water and rubbish to run my house - not much to ask surely.
Wont exactly fit in your car, but how about this:

http://www.gizmag.com/general-fusion-nuclear-proto...