The Greatr Climate Change Hijack
Discussion
turbobloke said:
If I remember correctly this is the programme where they say 'we really should stop trying to scare people with tipping points and doomsday scenarios and choose something else for our propaganada in the absence of any credible objective data'.
Or if not, it's about something else
What, on a BBC station? That doesn't make sense. Or if not, it's about something else
IF it said "we really should be worried and do more because we're all gonna melt" - THAT would be a BBC story..
Jasandjules said:
turbobloke said:
If I remember correctly this is the programme where they say 'we really should stop trying to scare people with tipping points and doomsday scenarios and choose something else for our propaganada in the absence of any credible objective data'.
Or if not, it's about something else
What, on a BBC station? That doesn't make sense. Or if not, it's about something else
IF it said "we really should be worried and do more because we're all gonna melt" - THAT would be a BBC story..
The 'thinking' behind the possibility is that about 70% of the population aren't falling for it. New approach needed.
Missed it as I was watching telly. However, I'll catch up with it on the Listen Again service.
In actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
In actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
Eric Mc said:
Missed it as I was watching telly. However, I'll catch up with it on the Listen Again service.
In actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
'Home Planet' on Radio 4 has Professor Philip Stott as one of the panel. He is a regular contributor against MMGWIn actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
Russ35 said:
Eric Mc said:
Missed it as I was watching telly. However, I'll catch up with it on the Listen Again service.
In actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
'Home Planet' on Radio 4 has Professor Philip Stott as one of the panel. He is a regular contributor against MMGWIn actual fact, outside of the mainstream news coverage, the BBC's reporting on climate change is a lot more balanced than you might think. Radio programmes like "Questions, Questions", "Costing the Earth" and "Material World" often feature climate change sceptics - or at least people who are not gung-ho MMGW advocates.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff