Nine sacked for breaching core ID card database

Nine sacked for breaching core ID card database

Author
Discussion

BJWoods

Original Poster:

5,015 posts

290 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
in the guardian today of all places...

surprised no one else has picked up on it today (ie mail)...

BAsically as soon as there is one catch all database, their will be massive incentive for people to access it for personal gain, selling off info to crims, etc

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/henryporte...

this ID database is the biggest risk to personal data security possible

http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/08/04/...

B

Edited by BJWoods on Tuesday 18th August 09:08

zac510

5,546 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Not surprising really is it?

(and I reckon The Grauniad hasn't been bad at covering data security/ID card/etc related matters over at least the last 12 mths).

Puggit

48,768 posts

254 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
So how can I raise a FoI request to find out what data is stored about me, and who accessed it, and why?

If we all did this...

Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

200 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Just as we predicted.

Eric Mc

122,699 posts

271 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
What did they expect?

NOTHING can be 100% secure.

Puggit

48,768 posts

254 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
What did they expect?

NOTHING can be 100% secure.
Yes, but inviting local council workers with nothing better to do then spend their time snooping in the database is a 100% sure-fire way of creating problems.

nonuts

15,855 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
This just highlights that the people making important decisions on our behalf have no concept of reality, it was clear to everyone with half a brain that this would be a huge issue.

BJWoods

Original Poster:

5,015 posts

290 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
yep, come to the uk, the organised crime gangs, destination of choice for identity theft...

let alone, foreign gov, terroists, petty snoopying, insurnce snooping, etc,etc

all in one place, yours for a small bribe to one of many hudreds of thousand of people with access..

or for a biiger bribe, someone with technical access, ie whichever consultancy has it this week, of course noe of it will evre be outsourced abroad, for cost control, willit. where data security/bribery may not (if possible) be even laxxer than here.

B


Smiler.

11,752 posts

236 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
It seems anyone can get information from the DWP. I received a letter yesterday stating that a certain insurance company ran a check on me, probably due to an ongoing claim.

tegwin

1,641 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
So how can I raise a FoI request to find out what data is stored about me, and who accessed it, and why?

If we all did this...
You dont need a FOI request.... by LAW you have a right to see any and all data that relates to you..... so if you want to see the content of the database that is about you... it is within your rights to do so... Wether the scumbags would let you see it is another question entireley...... would love to see someone try that and take it all the way to the european court of human fungus (rights)

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

223 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
So how can I raise a FoI request to find out what data is stored about me, and who accessed it, and why?

If we all did this...
If you want to see information held on the DWP's CIS database, you will need to contact the DWP and ask for a copy of it, in your request you may want to mention that whilst you have every right to see what is held about you, you will make further requests under the FOI act if your initial request is refused

Your request can be sent into them via Email and they HAVE to respond to it in a timely fashion smile

G_T

16,160 posts

196 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
Eric Mc said:
What did they expect?

NOTHING can be 100% secure.
Yes, but inviting local council workers with nothing better to do then spend their time snooping in the database is a 100% sure-fire way of creating problems.
I sincerely doubt that will be allowed.

When I worked for a very large credit card company everytime I accessed an account it was logged (or footprinted), so management could check at any time who's account I was looking at and why. They would also regularly audit my work to ensure I wasn't "snooping" around. Under the terms of my contract I could be fired for any inappropriate access.

Regular auditing combined with instant dismissal and the possibility of legal action would make such "snooping" unlikely IMO.

I'm still opposed to large centralised databases outside the NHS though.

nonuts

15,855 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
G_T said:
Regular auditing combined with instant dismissal and the possibility of legal action would make such "snooping" unlikely IMO.
You reckon that'll happen in the public sector?

G_T

16,160 posts

196 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
nonuts said:
G_T said:
Regular auditing combined with instant dismissal and the possibility of legal action would make such "snooping" unlikely IMO.
You reckon that'll happen in the public sector?
Good point.

In my experience the public sector are amongst the biggest morons in our society. Trusting them with something this important is definately a very bad idea.




mrmr96

13,736 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
G_T said:
Puggit said:
Eric Mc said:
What did they expect?

NOTHING can be 100% secure.
Yes, but inviting local council workers with nothing better to do then spend their time snooping in the database is a 100% sure-fire way of creating problems.
I sincerely doubt that will be allowed.

When I worked for a very large credit card company everytime I accessed an account it was logged (or footprinted), so management could check at any time who's account I was looking at and why. They would also regularly audit my work to ensure I wasn't "snooping" around. Under the terms of my contract I could be fired for any inappropriate access.

Regular auditing combined with instant dismissal and the possibility of legal action would make such "snooping" unlikely IMO.

I'm still opposed to large centralised databases outside the NHS though.
You may well get questioned and if you can't provide a decent answer then you'll be sacked. Doesn't sound like there was anything to STOP you though?

I used to work in the head office (data function) of a large UK highstreet bank. They had similar procedures to those ones you describe, where my actions would be logged and potentially scruitinsed with firing an option. There were also alert flags on high profile individuals which would immediately set 'alarm bells' ringing in another dept if any of us looked them up.

However this is only punishment after the incident has happened. The data would have escaped then and could no be retrieved. Criminal gangs would not find it hard to place people, or sufficiently bribe people already in place.

G_T

16,160 posts

196 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
You may well get questioned and if you can't provide a decent answer then you'll be sacked. Doesn't sound like there was anything to STOP you though?

I used to work in the head office (data function) of a large UK highstreet bank. They had similar procedures to those ones you describe, where my actions would be logged and potentially scruitinsed with firing an option. There were also alert flags on high profile individuals which would immediately set 'alarm bells' ringing in another dept if any of us looked them up.

However this is only punishment after the incident has happened. The data would have escaped then and could no be retrieved. Criminal gangs would not find it hard to place people, or sufficiently bribe people already in place.
But that's life though isn't it? You cannot prevent all crime whilst maintaining freewill and you can only prosecute after a crime has been committed. As Eric said, nothing is 100% secure.

After the recent fk ups, I would like to think the system will be fairly secure but I fully expect leaks to happen. My point is that such leaks will hardly be common place. The EU legislation on data protection is very strict (as I'm sure you know!) and our government could be chastised if the EU commission felt they were not maintaining adequate security. The EU is supposedly already keeping a close eye on our Big Brother government.

I do still remain unconvinced that such a system is anything other than a waste of taxpayers money though.









eddie1980

419 posts

194 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
I don't see why they cannot let you access your own records... And perhaps update it in an audit-able way.

Might have half a chance of being up to date, right and less scary then...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

261 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Ministers said:
repeatedly insisted that security will be absolute and that severe penalties will deter anyone tempted to read files illegally.
That'll be death, then...?

Edited by mybrainhurts on Tuesday 18th August 12:11

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

261 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
Who are these dumb celebrities who've applied for ID cards...?

G_T

16,160 posts

196 months

Tuesday 18th August 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Who are these dumb celebrities who've applied for ID cards...?
I'm sure if you slip a minister a fifty you could find out exactly who they are.