Even more electronic surveilance

[Quinny]

The initial message was deleted from this topic on 23 December 2011 at 22:03

[350GT]

Erm.. I would imagine if the owner cared for their dog, they would already be chipped. Those that are not are probably the chav type who have a dog for 'bravado' reasons. More punishment for the lawful I'm afraid.

[sinizter]

Quinny said:

350GT said:

Erm.. I would imagine if the owner cared for their dog, they would already be chipped. Those that are not are probably the chav type who have a dog for 'bravado' reasons. More punishment for the lawful I'm afraid.

It certainly looks that way...

It'd be far more fruitful if they chipped the "owners" of these dogs

Agree with both those comments.

[thinfourth2]

Quinny said:

350GT said:

Erm.. I would imagine if the owner cared for their dog, they would already be chipped. Those that are not are probably the chav type who have a dog for 'bravado' reasons. More punishment for the lawful I'm afraid.

It certainly looks that way...

It'd be far more fruitful if they chipped the "owners" of these dogs

Not a bad idea

You can even get a machine to chip them so it is a faster process