would britain have the guts to use its nuclear deterrant?
Discussion
Say if FOR EXAMPLE Iran had a bomb built that could reach the UK and some millitant group decided it was a good idea to launch it onto a UK city..... would the UK government of the time have the guts to send a sweet reply back with a 1st class stemp on it?
Or would the namby pamby good do'ers and pressure groups rally up an opposition with legal teams and human rights lovers with brussels support etc. and cause the UK to simply accept and go to the tables to have a nice talk with said millitant group to say how incorrect their choice of missile destination was?
Or would the namby pamby good do'ers and pressure groups rally up an opposition with legal teams and human rights lovers with brussels support etc. and cause the UK to simply accept and go to the tables to have a nice talk with said millitant group to say how incorrect their choice of missile destination was?
As mentioned above why bother?
It'd just be standard procedure i.e. Just trash the place with conventional weaponary, strike a deal over resources (if any), make sure they pay our contractors to repair the damage, instill a fresh dictator and do it all again in a couple of decades.
Quite a good financial investment these days.
It'd just be standard procedure i.e. Just trash the place with conventional weaponary, strike a deal over resources (if any), make sure they pay our contractors to repair the damage, instill a fresh dictator and do it all again in a couple of decades.
Quite a good financial investment these days.
loltolhurst said:
would be no need the yanks / israel would have the excuse they needed to flatten the place
yes, but what if the bomb was somehow launched not under the official capacity of the Iranian government for example.....say if a millitant group took control in a coup and took control over the government as it stood.I know its all hypothetical...but in the future if more of the countries where millitant groups exist devloped a bomb and somehow a millitant group with religious extreme views got control over their countries nuclear weapons and were able to fire them...would the west (or the attacked country) have the authority to launch a counter strike againt that country's general population ?
I think the UK would have to retaliate. The problem is the Trident-2's can carry upto 12 warheads so it would be a case of deciding wether it should be a multipe strike or just a single warhead retaliation. IIRC the UK is supposed to have about 150 active warheads out of a stockpile of 200.
Oakey said:
Ikemi said:
Isn't there a way the nuclear missle could be intercepted by some sort of ICBM?
Hey, that sounds like a plan, you should suggest it to Ronald ReaganI understand, although I might be wrong that nuclear warheads detonate via a trigger and not on impact, for safety reasons ... So could any sort of interception be used?
AJI said:
Say if FOR EXAMPLE Iran had a bomb built that could reach the UK and some millitant group decided it was a good idea to launch it onto a UK city..... would the UK government of the time have the guts to send a sweet reply back with a 1st class stemp on it?
Have you ever seen Threads ---> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThreadsGranted it's Soviet/US/British Nuclear war but it's caused by a coup in Iran it gives a good insight into what might happen and the results from it. It only takes a small thing to cause an escalation.
FourWheelDrift said:
AJI said:
Say if FOR EXAMPLE Iran had a bomb built that could reach the UK and some millitant group decided it was a good idea to launch it onto a UK city..... would the UK government of the time have the guts to send a sweet reply back with a 1st class stemp on it?
Have you ever seen Threads ---> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThreadsGranted it's Soviet/US/British Nuclear war but it's caused by a coup in Iran it gives a good insight into what might happen and the results from it. It only takes a small thing to cause an escalation.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff