Question Time

[elster]

It is worrying when the man speaking sense is from the Mail.

All income tax is spent on benefits!

[cazzer]

"Are you including the liberals in that"
"Why bother"

[deevlash]

why do they put pop stars on this show? Theyre always thick and uninformed.

[FNG]

deevlash said:

why do they put pop stars on this show? Theyre always thick and uninformed.

And lefties. On the BBC.

Ah-ha...

[john_p]

Shut up Jarvis.

Ian Duncan Smith can barely contain his hatred

[Northern Munkee]

A little unfair to ask Jarvis about the economy he lives in Paris for a start, better ask him something morality...


... oh hang on he's a bit incoherent on Biggs' parole.

Hitchens' more like it.

[mybrainhurts]

elster said:

It is worrying when the man speaking sense is from the Mail.

No, it's not.

You speak of unfounded prejudice...

[deevlash]

Hitchens for PM! Im quite enjoying IDS taking Jarvis apart on the Ronnie Biggs issue.

[Milky Joe]

Jarvis Cocker is cringeworthy, thought he was supposed to be some sort of intellect.

[deevlash]

jesus, get rid of cocker, what a moron.

[Northern Munkee]

Jarvis really out of his depth or on some medication, possibly tranquilisers! That lad asking the MOT question, get a proper haircut!

[Skywalker]

I could punch Harriett until my wrists hurt and then I would start kicking her.

[Marf]

mybrainhurts said:

elster said:

It is worrying when the man speaking sense is from the Mail.

No, it's not.

You speak of unfounded prejudice...

He was the only panel member to hit the nail on the head about the supposed ID Card u-turn. The ID card is meaningless, its the NIR that is the real issue, and one that seems to pass by most people.

[elster]

mybrainhurts said:

elster said:

It is worrying when the man speaking sense is from the Mail.

No, it's not.

You speak of unfounded prejudice...

Well when the rest of the panel are meant to be representing us and he is a journo. Yet he is the one who speaks sense.

I find that very worrying for not only parliament, but society.

[gashers]

14:30 mins in.

Hariet Harman tells the question master to shut up IDS.

Independant BBC ?

[F i F]

Jesus! If you found yourself in the joke where you're in a lift with a gun, two bullets and Allan Carr, you'd be in a hell of a quandary if the other two lift occupants were Jarvis Cocker and Harriet Harman.

FFS!!!!

[elster]

F i F said:

Jesus! If you found yourself in the joke where you're in a lift with a gun, two bullets and Allan Carr, you'd be in a hell of a quandary if the other two lift occupants were Jarvis Cocker and Harriet Harman.

FFS!!!!

However Jarvis did speak sense about teachers, why should someone go around ticking boxes to say this teacher does well because of ABC. That teachers were now teaching to pass exams, not to educate.

I would have no problem putting 2 bullets through Alan Carr just to see his face smashed to pieces, as long as they would go through and kill Harriet Harman.

[DJC]

F i F said:

Jesus! If you found yourself in the joke where you're in a lift with a gun, two bullets and Allan Carr, you'd be in a hell of a quandary if the other two lift occupants were Jarvis Cocker and Harriet Harman.

FFS!!!!

Nope.

Line the 3 of em up, one behind the other and then shoot them all through the head. Twice.

Make sure HH is at the front. Both times.

[Slaav]

Unfortuntaley HH was actually clapped on more than one occasion. Very worrying and I hope that this isn't a sign that people are starting to believe the bullst that is coming out of this government?

And I hope the producers of QT learn from the performance of Cocker; what a cock!

Overall not a good QT but HH is awful and worth watching just to see her snatch back that document when the Lib Dem guy was looking for the facts to dispel and refute what she had just said.

[F i F]

Slaav said:

Unfortuntaley HH was actually clapped on more than one occasion. Very worrying and I hope that this isn't a sign that people are starting to believe the bullst that is coming out of this government?

No it's a sign of politically driven BBC deliberate audience profiling after the debacles which occurred for a few weeks early on in the MPs expenses fiasco.

It's all in the name of balance, allegedly, in reality it's because if the audience reflected the true population's views the Govt supporters on the panel would be subject to vigorous rogering on a weekly basis.