Question Time

Author
Discussion

TankRizzo

Original Poster:

7,463 posts

199 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Clarke looks like he wants to throttle Esther Rantzen rofl

She is quite annoying though.

FourWheelDrift

89,424 posts

290 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Give that woman a band wagon and she'll jump on it. She's a moral crusader who believes her own powers of healing and forgets that 50% of the programme that made her famous was comedy and not all hard hitting consumer journalism.

She'd get more support if she had that dog that said "sausages" with her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrX-Yv8gLB8

Skywalker

3,269 posts

220 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
I can't stand her - but she will be yseful to rattle the cages of the "political class"vomit

I just fear the ability of the 'Celeberarti' to command the voytes of the grockles.

fk me - half of the Beano readers would vote for Eating-Disorder-Spice because "Well, she's famous and married to Becks, int she?"

What next? Amy Crackwe for Home Secretary (although in fairness, like Jackpot Jacqui's hubby - I would sooner watch gay porn and charge it to the taxpayers than think about actually making the beast with two backs with her).

loltolhurst

1,994 posts

190 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
TankRizzo said:
Clarke looks like he wants to throttle Esther Rantzen rofl

She is quite annoying though.
I'd sponsor him - was it me or did anyone else have to keep turning the volume down when she spoke.

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

206 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
Just when you thought she had been relegated to daytime tv adverts for ambulance chasing...

She is loving herself in the same way celeb I love the sound o my own voice that was annoying about most politicians an particularly a certain group of women politicians are.
Falconer kept talking in such a way that he agreed it was terrible whatever the question that accused his party of government had done wrong, what is he on the show for if it isn't to defend the official line.

MPs once again demonstrated they had learnt nothing about lettng in the sunlight with the cack handed attempt at cover up (sorry redacted, a bullst made up word that sounds like its out of the same ameribullst lexicon of extraordinary rendition, illegal combatants, version on expenses, by blacking huge swathes of copy, which had we not had the telegraph, then heather Brooke and co, would never discovered flipping, capital gains, moats, duck houses (addresses removed for security reasons) couldn't believe ed davies for lib dems, saying I've invited my local journalists around to scrutinize the unredacted versions tomorrow like the are going to be able to forsenically audit it in an hour or so photo op!. That said I can't believe that no one pulled the panel on how redacted/keeping expenses secret is exactly the same issue as yet another private inquiry into Iraq. Secrecy not letting the sunlight in. We want the truth, we know they are full of st. We know they know we know they are lying to us, again and again, particularly labour and particularly Gordon brown, we seems to be completely out of touch with the public and reality, he reminds me of portrayals of Richard Nixon.