Ping-pong with my MP...

Author
Discussion

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
I sent this my MP recently:

Dear <MP>

Thank you for your letter of 21/05/2009.

May I ask why you feel it is necessary for MP's to own two homes and, hence, claim the second home allowance. Would it not be more cost effective for MP's to rent a room in London. I rent a perfectly adequate room in London which costs me £425.00 per calendar month. Perhaps it is that MP's can have the taxpayers fund the mortage interest payments on the second home and gain a financial advantage when that property is sold.

If that is not the case, then I would welcome a statement from you that any gain that you have made from this arrangment will be either returned to the taxpayer or donated to a local charity.

Thank you for your comments regarding your food allowance. However, I think you misunderstand the issue. It is not about where you need to be in order to be able to fulfill your role, it is why you feel it appropriate for the taxpayer to fund your eating habits. Presumably, you eat when in your constituency and the taxpayer does not pick up the bill. You do not have additional food costs because you are in London - Can you not purcahse cheap food from a local shop near to Westminster?

Since you concede that this was an error of judgment to claim the food allowance, I would welcome a statement that you intend to repay all your food allowance claims, since becoming an MP, in full.

I agree that the current situation is unacceptable and bad for democracy and lay the problem firmly at this Government's door. It is Labour that have been in power for the last 12 years and there has been ample opportunity to sort this problem out.

I am delighted that Michael Martin has announced his resignation. I disagree fundamentally with your view that he has been made a scapegoat. He has spent considerable sums of money trying to keep MP's expense secret. Why? Does he (or you) think that democracy is better served by having such matters not in the public domain?

I am not at all suprised to learn that Labour Members of the House of Lords have been suspended over their conduct. I would welcome your thoughts on the issue and what can be done to clean up this problem.

Labour MP's who have indicated that they will resign over the expenses scandal can look forward to a huge sum of money in terms of the Resettlement Allowance. If wrong-doing has occured, that should be investigated ASAP, and they should be thrown out of the PLP and investigated by the police. It is nothing short of a moral outrage that they will cling on to their sets to the General Election, pocket the Resettlement Allowance and possibly end up in the House of Lords.

Yuors sincerely

Mr. IPSG.GLF



Response today from the House of Commons:

Dear Mr IPSG.GLF

I have made a decision not to reply to the substance of your emails. The fact is that you see me as lacking integrity. Consequently, I am of the belief that whatever I say you will not believe.

Yours sincerely

<MP>



I've phoned her constituency office for a face to face meeting with said MP!

Thoughts, in the meantime, welcome.





Edited by ipsg.glf on Thursday 18th June 17:02

Puggit

48,768 posts

254 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Clearly this isn't the only communication between you, in both directions - so we don't have the full story...

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
My email was the one that triggered her response. Previous communication has been pretty banile, TBH.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

234 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Her reply should have actually been the following:

Dear Sir.

Why do you fill your emails with lots of long words, sentences and para thingys? I find it hard to read them on my expenses paid smart phone and my head hurts.

The labour government is listening to the people and we will be fixing all of the problems soon. Please remember, this is a global problem and I agree that it looks bad.

Also, the BNP are racists!

Regards Labour person.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

250 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
ipsg.glf's M.P. said:
The fact is that you see me as lacking integrity. Consequently, I am of the belief that whatever I say you will not believe.
She's right though, isn't she?

Don

28,377 posts

290 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
ipsg.glf's M.P. said:
The fact is that you see me as lacking integrity. Consequently, I am of the belief that whatever I say you will not believe.
She's right though, isn't she?
Yup. And ipsg.glf is clearly not a supporter so his vote is lost already, hence, she might as well tell him to feck off.

But ipsg.glf has clearly done a great job of winding her up. Excellent work. biggrin

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
ipsg.glf's M.P. said:
The fact is that you see me as lacking integrity. Consequently, I am of the belief that whatever I say you will not believe.
She's right though, isn't she?
Indeed. But we didn't need the expenses scandal for me to form that view.

The problem I have is that, as a constituent, I expect a response to my questions. Is that too much to ask?

I think she just wants to avoid having to answer the question about wheterh she will repay the cash.

Edited by ipsg.glf on Thursday 18th June 17:19

ypauly

15,137 posts

206 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
ipsg.glf's M.P. said:
The fact is that you see me as lacking integrity. Consequently, I am of the belief that whatever I say you will not believe.
She's right though, isn't she?
How very dare you!


Labour MPs are never and I mean never right.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

251 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Wouldn't it be better just to let them get on with their jobs?

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

250 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Wouldn't it be better just to let them get on with their jobs?
Only until we can arrange the piano wire and lamppost interface.

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Wouldn't it be better just to let them get on with their jobs?
In a.....

Those pesky constituents. Those pesky elections. Those pesky Acts of Parliament.

kind of way you mean???

jesterjesterjesterjester

elster

17,517 posts

216 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Send them to the local paper.

Get them to print a story about how the local MP is unwilling to answer your questions.

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
elster said:
Send them to the local paper.

Get them to print a story about how the local MP is unwilling to answer your questions.
Face to face first and see what she has to say. That is if she will grant me an audience.

tinman0

18,231 posts

246 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
What was the name of the MP?


elster

17,517 posts

216 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
ipsg.glf said:
elster said:
Send them to the local paper.

Get them to print a story about how the local MP is unwilling to answer your questions.
Face to face first and see what she has to say. That is if she will grant me an audience.
Yes, well they do have an open door surgery. Well I thought all had to.

Can you not just turn up then? I'd also bring a "friend" with you. Who happens to be a journo.

BJG1

5,966 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
email her back and question why she feels unable to respond to you querying if she'll pay back the food allowance? Tell her you'll definitely believe a yes or no answer to it.

cs02rm0

13,812 posts

197 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
What a cop out not to answer. WTF are we paying them for?

ipsg.glf

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

224 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
What was the name of the MP?
PM sent

johnfm

13,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Are expenses claims what Winky was referring to when he said a million times at PMs:


"we are the party of the many(claims), while they are the party of the few (moats and duck houses)..."

tinman0

18,231 posts

246 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
ipsg.glf said:
tinman0 said:
What was the name of the MP?
PM sent
Thanks, but not sure why you bothered to be honest. Not quite sure what the point of the thread is after that either.