Labour's latest wheeze to allow more immigration

Labour's latest wheeze to allow more immigration

Author
Discussion

Police State

Original Poster:

4,110 posts

226 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
They will not be content until they balance the ratios of indigenous/non indigenous permantly in their favour.


http://britanniaradio.blogspot.com/2009/06/want-br...



Want a British passport? Just stand on a picket line or canvas for Labour


Migrants will win fast-track passports if they stand on picket lines or knock on doors asking people to vote Labour, it emerged last night.

The Home Office says trade union activism and political canvassing should count towards the planned new system of 'earned citizenship' .

Migrants who complete 50 hours of voluntary work will be entitled to receive British citizenship after six years - two years earlier than if they do nothing.


Migrants will win fast-track passports if they, among other things, stand on picket lines, such as those set up outside Tube stations in London this week, or volunterr for a 'faith-group'...


Ministers had originally given examples such as running a local scout group rather than helping unions such as the RMT, which this week inflicted crippling strike action on London.

Critics will point to the historic relationship between Labour and the unions. Migrants cannot vote until they become citizens - so, by using union membership to speed their applications, Labour is potentially swelling its own support.

The details emerged in a Home Office document circulated among MPs this week. It reveals that employers will be expected to give people time off, where required, to complete the service.

Shadow Immigration Minister Damian Green said: 'This Government seems to think that standing on a picket line or handing out political leaflets should give people a fast track to a British passport.

'These are half-baked ideas which show that at best Ministers are making up policy as they go along.

'This sort of proposal threatens to bring the whole idea of earning British citizenship into disrepute.'


The list of activities which count towards earned citizenship includes trade union activities and canvassing for a political party - which also covers the Tories and Liberal Democrats.





eldar

22,503 posts

202 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Assumes immigrants will all vote Labour. In reality most are brighter than that.

CrashTD

1,788 posts

210 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Surely there is a law against this?

Reminds me of the beginning of Scarface. Where all they need to do is murder the communist to get a Green Card.

Jasandjules

70,419 posts

235 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
That is scary if True....


Mclovin

1,679 posts

204 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
this is sickening if true as its fixing the outcome of an election...

XitUp

7,690 posts

210 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.

esselte

14,626 posts

273 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.
So you're happy with the "come and support Labour and you'll get quicker citizenship" that this seems to be promoting?

Eric Mc

122,699 posts

271 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
Is this actually true or a bit more scaremongering?

Balmoral Green

41,630 posts

254 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
esselte said:
XitUp said:
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.
So you're happy with the "come and support Labour and you'll get quicker citizenship" that this seems to be promoting?
Where does it say that? they could be canvassing for any party. It even says that in the article.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Saturday 13th June 18:06

ATG

21,170 posts

278 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
The criteria include an individuals contribution to their community. Being invovled in politics is being involved in your community - it has nothing to do with supporting Labour. Clearly union participation is going to introduce a left-wing bias, but it is hard to see how one could object to it being included in the immigration criteria because it is nonetheless a tangible contribution to society.

To see this as a deliberate attempt by Labour to ship immigrant labour-voters into the country at the expense of the "indigenous" population is hysterical nonsense.

XitUp

7,690 posts

210 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
esselte said:
XitUp said:
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.
So you're happy with the "come and support Labour and you'll get quicker citizenship" that this seems to be promoting?
Seeing as that bit isn't real I think I can deal with it.

Gunny Sergeant D

2,248 posts

246 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
Its easy to knee jerk into a reaction. In reality its probably a load of BNP inspired bo11ock5.

It depends on how you read it, think about it they are getting migrants to understand the ways of the country. It does not specify they have to work for or vote for the Liebour Party.

elster

17,517 posts

216 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
As we are part of the EU anyone from the EU states can come live here, so I am guessing this is aimed more towards the African and Asian immigrants. Which a lot probably seem to have a better sense of community than certain EU states.

I don't see why we couldn't do the same as most commonwealth countries seem to and allow those workers who are needed here.


DSM2

3,624 posts

206 months

Saturday 13th June 2009
quotequote all
eldar said:
Assumes immigrants will all vote Labour. In reality most are brighter than that.
Maybe but no fker else, in their right mind, will...............

Guybrush

4,364 posts

212 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
I've always thought the left want to destroy the fabric of the British way of life. This reinforces my view.

Eric Mc

122,699 posts

271 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
Why would they have such an agenda?

What IS the "British" way of life?

Semi hemi

1,800 posts

204 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
esselte said:
XitUp said:
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.
So you're happy with the "come and support Labour and you'll get quicker citizenship" that this seems to be promoting?
Where does it say that? they could be canvassing for any party. It even says that in the article.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Saturday 13th June 18:06
trust you to spoil a perfectly good rant by sticking to facts, this is PH = Scaremongering matters, dontcha know?

esselte

14,626 posts

273 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
esselte said:
XitUp said:
Get rid of the faith group bit and I don't have a problem with it.
So you're happy with the "come and support Labour and you'll get quicker citizenship" that this seems to be promoting?
Where does it say that? they could be canvassing for any party. It even says that in the article.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Saturday 13th June 18:06
I was commenting on the "stand on a picket line" quote.....to picket you have to be in a union which to me implies Labour......

Bing o

15,184 posts

225 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Why would they have such an agenda?

What IS the "British" way of life?
It's long gone, sadly Eric.

Replaced by oppression, ooman rights for those that deserve none, and an ever increasingly down trodden and depressed indigenous population.

Eric Mc

122,699 posts

271 months

Sunday 14th June 2009
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Eric Mc said:
Why would they have such an agenda?

What IS the "British" way of life?
It's long gone, sadly Eric.

Replaced by oppression, ooman rights for those that deserve none, and an ever increasingly down trodden and depressed indigenous population.
What's gone?

People are always quick to lament the late departed "British Way of Life" - without ever really explaining what they mean by it.

I'm not saying that there isn't one - I'd just like those that go on about it explain what it is they mean by it.