What's that scar on your hand?
Discussion
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/sc...
Pretty much the best reason in the world. Awesome!!!!1
Pretty much the best reason in the world. Awesome!!!!1
DIW35 said:
I like the bit in the report where it says it 'bounced' off his hand before making a 1 foot crater in the ground. I hardly expect anything doing 30,000 mph would bounce off anything.
ETA Beaten to it
If it left a 3 inch scar it sounds like it brushed his hand, rather than a direct hit.ETA Beaten to it
Edited by DIW35 on Friday 12th June 11:00
Surely the odds are higher than 1 in a million?
NitroNick said:
If the chances are "just 1 in a million" then why is there only 1 other recorded case?
Who would you sue for an injury caused like this? ....god?
Personally I think its BS, the real story is that an intergalactic sniper with poor aim wants this kid dead!
Sue the sniper, Duh.Who would you sue for an injury caused like this? ....god?
Personally I think its BS, the real story is that an intergalactic sniper with poor aim wants this kid dead!
Neil_H said:
DIW35 said:
I like the bit in the report where it says it 'bounced' off his hand before making a 1 foot crater in the ground. I hardly expect anything doing 30,000 mph would bounce off anything.
ETA Beaten to it
If it left a 3 inch scar it sounds like it brushed his hand, rather than a direct hit.ETA Beaten to it
Edited by DIW35 on Friday 12th June 11:00
Surely the odds are higher than 1 in a million?
More bad science reporting. How the hell can you quantify the chances of surviving a meteorite strike as 1 in a million? Rather round figure; what sort of sample size did they have to come up with that one? And like others have said, there's no way that hit his hand and THEN made a crater in the ground. You'd get a bit more than 'a nasty 3 inch scar' with that sort of energy involved. I think the 14 y/o actually wrote the article.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff