What's that scar on your hand?

Author
Discussion

okgo

Original Poster:

39,144 posts

204 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/sc...

Pretty much the best reason in the world. Awesome!!!!1

esselte

14,626 posts

273 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
It "bounced off his hand" and caused a foot wide crater? One of those I don't beleive....

DIW35

4,157 posts

206 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
I like the bit in the report where it says it 'bounced' off his hand before making a 1 foot crater in the ground. I hardly expect anything doing 30,000 mph would bounce off anything.

ETA Beaten to it frown

Edited by DIW35 on Friday 12th June 11:00

okgo

Original Poster:

39,144 posts

204 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Obviously it tore straight through his hand. Or as you say it's bs.

Neil_H

15,343 posts

257 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
DIW35 said:
I like the bit in the report where it says it 'bounced' off his hand before making a 1 foot crater in the ground. I hardly expect anything doing 30,000 mph would bounce off anything.

ETA Beaten to it frown

Edited by DIW35 on Friday 12th June 11:00
If it left a 3 inch scar it sounds like it brushed his hand, rather than a direct hit.

Surely the odds are higher than 1 in a million?

esselte

14,626 posts

273 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Perhaps he should have had one of these..


robinhood21

30,831 posts

238 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Possibly hit the ground first and damage to hand caused by flying concrete/pavement/whatever.

Murray993

1,515 posts

239 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
we need a pic of the hole it made.

I think they meant glanced off his hand at 30,000 mile an hour leaving a nasty graze...

ewenm

28,506 posts

251 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
esselte said:
Perhaps he should have had one of these..

Member of the EarthCrossers?


Copyright Jasper Fforde
wink

Edited by ewenm on Friday 12th June 11:09

Engineer1

10,486 posts

215 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Murray993 said:
we need a pic of the hole it made.

I think they meant glanced off his hand at 30,000 mile an hour leaving a nasty graze...
NO NO NO we all know that it must have killed him, being hit by something travelling at 30000 mph must be lethal wink

NitroNick

749 posts

216 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
If the chances are "just 1 in a million" then why is there only 1 other recorded case?

Who would you sue for an injury caused like this? ....god?

Personally I think its BS, the real story is that an intergalactic sniper with poor aim wants this kid dead!


Murray993

1,515 posts

239 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
NitroNick said:
If the chances are "just 1 in a million" then why is there only 1 other recorded case?

Who would you sue for an injury caused like this? ....god?

Personally I think its BS, the real story is that an intergalactic sniper with poor aim wants this kid dead!
Sue the sniper, Duh.

Martial Arts Man

6,625 posts

192 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Neil_H said:
DIW35 said:
I like the bit in the report where it says it 'bounced' off his hand before making a 1 foot crater in the ground. I hardly expect anything doing 30,000 mph would bounce off anything.

ETA Beaten to it frown

Edited by DIW35 on Friday 12th June 11:00
If it left a 3 inch scar it sounds like it brushed his hand, rather than a direct hit.

Surely the odds are higher than 1 in a million?
The quote could also have been read as meaning he had a 1/1000000 chance of survival.

Dr_Gonzo

960 posts

231 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
More bad science reporting. How the hell can you quantify the chances of surviving a meteorite strike as 1 in a million? Rather round figure; what sort of sample size did they have to come up with that one? And like others have said, there's no way that hit his hand and THEN made a crater in the ground. You'd get a bit more than 'a nasty 3 inch scar' with that sort of energy involved. I think the 14 y/o actually wrote the article.

V8mate

45,899 posts

195 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Dr_Gonzo said:
I think the 14 y/o actually wrote the article.
hehe

Show and tell.

Jasandjules

70,419 posts

235 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Maybe just a glancing blow past his hand near enough to tear the skin?

V8mate

45,899 posts

195 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Maybe just a glancing blow past his hand near enough to tear the skin?
Near enough to tear the skin AND send his whole boy flying scratchchin

g_attrill

7,975 posts

252 months

Friday 12th June 2009
quotequote all
I am also dubious in that the articles don't mention any corroborating evidence for the event, for example people who heard it, how they got the fragment out, pictures of the "crater" (there is a pothole in one photo, but the tarmac repair looks old).