Dum dum dum, another one bites the dust...
Discussion
It means he intends to hang on regardless of the cost to the country to his PM job.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
Jasandjules said:
It means he intends to hang on regardless of the cost to the country to his PM job.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
I get the impression he is not the only selfish one - look at Caroline Flint - On Thursday night pledging support for Winky - didn't get a promotion so resigns and slates him - She is a prime example of a potitician that is only in it for herself, which in my opinion sums the entire Labour Party. In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
I am surprised the press didn't make a bigger deal out of this.
Jasandjules said:
It means he intends to hang on regardless of the cost to the country to his PM job.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
There are alot of people baying for blood, but what would Brown's resignation, actually achieve?In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
Not a lot I dont think. Its likely he will go at the next election anyway, why throw Parliament into further chaos by removing him?
Once he's gone, there will noone left to blame, just another idiot with a fresh set of excuses who uses the word "clearly" a lot.
cazzer said:
ianash said:
It seems she refused to pledge loyalty to Winky and then resigned.
Kinell...I thought you were jokin there until I just saw the report.Who does he think he is? Ceasar?
308mate said:
There are alot of people baying for blood, but what would Brown's resignation, actually achieve?
Not a lot I dont think. Its likely he will go at the next election anyway, why throw Parliament into further chaos by removing him?.
It would prevent him from implementing any more of his "Vision" for this country, you know the one where elections are outlawed and you can go to prison for posesing a lined note book Not a lot I dont think. Its likely he will go at the next election anyway, why throw Parliament into further chaos by removing him?.
jesusbuiltmycar said:
Jasandjules said:
It means he intends to hang on regardless of the cost to the country to his PM job.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
I get the impression he is not the only selfish one - look at Caroline Flint - On Thursday night pledging support for Winky - didn't get a promotion so resigns and slates him - She is a prime example of a potitician that is only in it for herself, which in my opinion sums the entire Labour Party. In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
I am surprised the press didn't make a bigger deal out of this.
Although all politicians will say nice things about their leader, until they know there are some others behind them.
Look at the Labour MP who said that the people were wanting a change of leader and was suggesting a secret ballot. His constituency was then told to keep him in line. It seems they are baning freedom of speech by their own members now.
Jasandjules said:
It means he intends to hang on regardless of the cost to the country to his PM job.
In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
Which is what I was saying a year ago. Notice also that in all the resignation letters/speeches, they pledge their loyalty to party first, then country, which on it's own should be a treasonable offence.In some respects I think that shows what a selfish, deluded and stalinistic individual we are dealing with. I think that will cement the fact that the Tories will get in by a landslide at the GE (June 2010) but I fear we may have a scorched earth policy in place before then.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff