Vote Match

Author
Discussion

TomE

Original Poster:

1,252 posts

196 months

Sunday 31st May 2009
quotequote all
Thought some of you may be interested in this website, as I know some people are not sure who to vote for in the Euro elections:

http://www.votematch.co.uk/europe/

It asks for your views on a number of issues regarding Europe and then suggests the party which you are most aligned to.

Hope it's not a repost..... I did try a search but nothing came up.

TomE

Original Poster:

1,252 posts

196 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Bump for that daytime crowd.....

I thought it was quite interesting anyway!

The Moose

23,052 posts

215 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Yeah I saw that a while back.

Interesting stuff, but pretty flawed really. I had to work it out for myself from the table at the end.

At the moment, not sure I'm gunna even bother voting... Someone wanna buy mine!! LOL

Cheers

The Moose

Silent1

19,761 posts

241 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Tories for me, although we do disagree on farming subsidy policy ( i think intensive cropping should be supported as well as small scale farms, the Tories are only for small farms.)

ETA. oh and nuclear power and quite a few other things, but they fit the best.

Edited by Silent1 on Monday 1st June 14:18

lizardking

435 posts

205 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I got....
Nick Trew (Jury Team)

Not sure what to think about that, WHO is he??

Don

28,377 posts

290 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Interesting.

My best match was only around 60% in agreement.

So. No party really represents me that well. The ones who do it least badly are the Conservatives but it isn't close. Not really...

FoolOnTheHill

1,018 posts

217 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
UKIP, Jury Team and Tories.

Unsurprising really as I think Europe should fk off and let us run our own countries.

BlackVanGirl

9,932 posts

217 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
58/66 ~88% Lib Dems eek
48/66 ~72% Labour eekeek

None of them feel/look like a particularly good match to me.

Voted no on the electronic hospital records thing not because I disagree with the concept but because in practice it's a recipe for widespread disaster, data loss/theft/misuse, huge inaccuracy and colossal waste of money - there wasn't a ticky box to say all that though. smile

Edit to add:
Krishnamurty Tayya of the Jury Party which seems to be a sort of anti-politics party confused thinks that
fking Moron said:
I also believe that the modern medicines taken by mothers during pregnancy and vaccinations given to children after birth are causing mind-bending leading to violence and crime. I want to introduce homoeopathic clinics everywhere in the constituency and improve real health.
Just as well he's not got a snowball's chance, eh? rage




Edited by BlackVanGirl on Monday 1st June 15:36

SoapyShowerBoy

1,775 posts

201 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
It came up with UKIP for me.

TomE

Original Poster:

1,252 posts

196 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
BlackVanGirl said:
Just as well he's not got a snowball's chance, eh? rage
I wouldn't be so sure:

lizardking said:
I got....
Nick Trew (Jury Team)
FoolOnTheHill said:
Jury Team
Seems like they agree with some people's views on here, even if they are complete nut jobs!


angryS3owner

15,855 posts

235 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I came out with UKIP and Jury's team equal on that and slightly ahead of conservatives and lib dems were beating them... interesting.

hairykrishna

13,473 posts

209 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
TomE said:
BlackVanGirl said:
Just as well he's not got a snowball's chance, eh? rage
I wouldn't be so sure:

lizardking said:
I got....
Nick Trew (Jury Team)
FoolOnTheHill said:
Jury Team
Seems like they agree with some people's views on here, even if they are complete nut jobs!
Isn't it the fact that 'Jury Team' is a collection of independents? Hence their ratings on that site might not reflect that their individual members view and policies might be as mad as a sack of badgers?

Edited by hairykrishna on Monday 1st June 22:05

madbadger

11,610 posts

250 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Almost a dead heat between Labour, Jury, UKIP and Conservatives for me. No use at all then. (A bit like the elections)

hairykrishna said:
8< ... policies might be as mad as a sack of badgers?
That might be exactly what we need.

smile

FunkyNige

9,065 posts

281 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
My top was Green Party.

yikes

hairykrishna

13,473 posts

209 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
FunkyNige said:
My top was Green Party.

yikes
Hippy. I'm a 'believer' to use TB's terminology and they still only just beat UKIP at the bottom of the table for me. Their attitude to animal testing and nuclear power, both of which I consider 'important', fked them.

ludo

5,308 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
FunkyNige said:
My top was Green Party.

yikes
To put that into perspective, the Green party was only fourth even for me! wink

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

257 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
UKIP

About right.

Colonial

13,553 posts

211 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Jury team

Who the feck are they?

bp1

798 posts

214 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
UKIP(over 80%) closely followed by Jury Team and Lib Dems with the tories way down. Bloody green party was a better match than the Tories. Just wtf are tory policies these days?

jesusbuiltmycar

4,620 posts

260 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Colonial said:
Jury team

Who the feck are they?
An attempt to get more Independents elected - Their motto is "Politics Without Parties"....

I am surprised there has not been more support on here - enough people state the will:
  1. Spoil their vote
  2. Hate the Party Whip system
  3. Want more independents elected
but seem oblivious to their existence - I guess they must live in their only little dream world oblivious to what is going...