Oh dear, Nick Griffin has bricked it...

[AstonV12]

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/BNP-Chai...

Proof that he stands for nothing.

Churchill's family "embarrassed"

Edited by AstonV12 on Wednesday 27th May 17:14

[grumbledoak]

Sounds like press-speak for un-invited, TBH. Must have been an interesting conversation...



ETA- Reading it properly, he was very clearly un-invited, and this is just face-saving.

Edited by grumbledoak on Wednesday 27th May 17:16

[collateral]

OMGLIBRALZLEFTCONSPIRACIEWTF



You can't make this st up!

eta more typos

Edited by collateral on Wednesday 27th May 17:57

[Baby Huey]

Barnbrook would have been uninvited if he insisted on taking Little Nicky Hitler.

[Jasandjules]

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

[Baby Huey]

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

[s2art]

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

Didnt Mugabe once have tea with the Queen?

[esselte]

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

Do you think her aides would have let her walk into an ambush...?

[Jasandjules]

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere.

Are you sure? I mean, as far as I am concerned Tony Blair is a war criminal, yet he was allowed to see the Queen.

This is the problem. I do not believe that in a free society we ought to bar someone for such things. It is too much of the leftie dogma of banning those things that they disagree with. Personally I believe we all have the same rights to say and think what we wish, and I decry the fact that the thought police are out there.

[Soovy]

Makes me laugh.

Mainstream politician have been caught for the thieves they are, and immediately the said thieves start with the attacks on the BNP.

They are SO SO scared. And change is SO SO coming.

[Baby Huey]

Soovy said:

Makes me laugh.

Mainstream politician have been caught for the thieves they are, and immediately the said thieves start with the attacks on the BNP.

They are SO SO scared. And change is SO SO coming.

How many seats do you think the BNP will win?

[Busa_Rush]

He's the leader of a legitimate political party who have MP's . . . they receive public money to represent their constituents, who voted for them over and above the other parties.

So this is democracy at work, if we like it or not. So why should the other parties apply pressure to stop Griffin attending ? Seriously out of order despe the fact he's a nasty piece of work.

[James.]

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

I agree. He has every right to attend. It's not as if him going means that the Queen supports the BNP. Surely people are more sophisticated than that? If no one votes for him then he won't get any publicity.

[eharding]

s2art said:

Didnt Mugabe once have tea with the Queen?

Yes, but I understand she didn't actually drink any of the tea that was served. Mugabe did, however.

I also understand that Pip the Greek was observed taking a leak into a teapot in the kitchens at Buck House shortly Mugabe met with Madge. Bless 'im.

[Baby Huey]

Jasandjules said:

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere.

Are you sure? I mean, as far as I am concerned Tony Blair is a war criminal, yet he was allowed to see the Queen.

This is the problem. I do not believe that in a free society we ought to bar someone for such things. It is too much of the leftie dogma of banning those things that they disagree with. Personally I believe we all have the same rights to say and think what we wish, and I decry the fact that the thought police are out there.

Whether he goes or not doesn't bother me, I was just pointing out that if they wanted to find a reason for uninviting him then there is as a legitimate one.

I don't honestly think this is PC gone mad, more that the Royals want to distance themselves from fascism and accusations of cavorting with racists.

As with Harry's somewhat foolish but not fascist fancy dress outfit these stories can get out of hand.

[AndrewW-G]

Busa_Rush said:

He's the leader of a legitimate political party who have MP's . . .

They dont have any MP's a few councillors yes, MP's no not yet

[elster]

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

Do you think she would of even cared about meeting him?

[Baby Huey]

elster said:

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

Do you think she would of even cared about meeting him?

Probably wouldn't meet, don't they have thousands at these tea parties.

[esselte]

Baby Huey said:

elster said:

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

Do you think she would of even cared about meeting him?

Probably wouldn't meet, don't they have thousands at these tea parties.

Yep,about 8000 at a time I think.

[elster]

Baby Huey said:

elster said:

Baby Huey said:

Jasandjules said:

Is it not a disgrace that such a thing should happen? He's an odious man, BUT he is protected by the same rights and freedoms we are.

You've got to draw the line somewhere. Are you saying absolutely anyone should be allowed to have tea with the Queen?

He has convictions for inciting racial violence, should they allow ex-crims at all? Rapists or Murderers maybe?

Do you think she would of even cared about meeting him?

Probably wouldn't meet, don't they have thousands at these tea parties.

I think it depends which one, when I was at a the Queens for tea and tiffin there were probably a fair few hundred. Although I never did meet the Queen, my grandad did.