Crunch time... postal voting papers on my desk
Discussion
tubbystu said:
Don't waste it, spoil it. Write none of the above at the bottom of the list and tick that.
If you just don't vote all the system records is a lower turnout. If you return a spoiled paper it has to be counted as I spoiled paper and recorded as such. A more effective tactic I believe.
Yes, I considered this but then it still means those who vote the minority parties will have a bigger "say".If you just don't vote all the system records is a lower turnout. If you return a spoiled paper it has to be counted as I spoiled paper and recorded as such. A more effective tactic I believe.
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
UKIP
Criminals also, worse in facts2art said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
UKIP
Criminals also, worse in factThe leader of the UK Independence party (Ukip), which wants to lead Britain out of the EU, has taken £2m of taxpayers' money in expenses and allowances as a member of the European Parliament, on top of his £64,000 a year salary.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/mps...
Edited by herewego on Monday 25th May 08:30
herewego said:
s2art said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
UKIP
Criminals also, worse in factThe leader of the UK Independence party (Ukip), which wants to lead Britain out of the EU, has taken £2m of taxpayers' money in expenses and allowances as a member of the European Parliament, on top of his £64,000 a year salary.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/mps...
s2art said:
herewego said:
s2art said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
birdcage said:
Jasandjules said:
UKIP
Criminals also, worse in factThe leader of the UK Independence party (Ukip), which wants to lead Britain out of the EU, has taken £2m of taxpayers' money in expenses and allowances as a member of the European Parliament, on top of his £64,000 a year salary.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/mps...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/mps...
Pooh said:
Voting on the basis of the current expenses scandal is daft, there are far more important issues and none of the parties have escaped the scandal anyway.
Do a bit of research into what they stand for and vote for the party that you agree with most.
You're right there but do you vote for the minority party that you really prefer or the party that only partially represents what you want but stands a better chance of winning.Do a bit of research into what they stand for and vote for the party that you agree with most.
herewego said:
Pooh said:
Voting on the basis of the current expenses scandal is daft, there are far more important issues and none of the parties have escaped the scandal anyway.
Do a bit of research into what they stand for and vote for the party that you agree with most.
You're right there but do you vote for the minority party that you really prefer or the party that only partially represents what you want but stands a better chance of winning.Do a bit of research into what they stand for and vote for the party that you agree with most.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff